When a brief flash is presented at the same location as a moving object, the flash is perceived to lag behind the moving object to an extent that increases with the speed of the object. Previous studies showed that moving objects appear faster at low luminance as a result of their longer motion trace. Here we examine whether this faster perceived motion also affects the amount of the flash lag at low luminance. We first verified that speed was overestimated at low luminance with our stimulus. We then asked subjects to align a briefly flashed dot with the moving target. Results showed that the flash-lag effect increased with physical speed at both high and low luminance, but there was no additional increase due to the perceived increase of speed at low luminance. We suggest that although motion blur contributes to perceived speed, it does not contribute to the speed information that influences its perceived position.
AddamsR, 1834“An account of a peculiar optical phenomenon seen after having looked at a moving body”London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science5373–374 ◂
2.
AdelsonE HBergenJ R, 1985“Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion”Journal of the Optical Society of America A2284–299 doi:10.1364/JOSAA2.000284 ◂
3.
AnzaiAOhzawaIFreemanR D, 2001“Joint-encoding of motion and depth by visual cortical neurons: Neural basis of the Pulfrich effect”Nature Neuroscience4513–518 ◂
4.
BarlowH BOlshausenB A, 2004“Convergent evidence for the visual analysis of optic flow through anisotropic attenuation of high spatial frequencies”Journal of Vision4415–426 doi:10.1167/4.6.1 ◂
5.
BaldoM VKleinS A, 1995“Extrapolation or attention shift”Nature378565–566 doi:10.1038/378565-a0 ◂
BurrD CRossJ, 2002“Direct evidence that speedlines influence motion mechanisms”Journal of Neuroscience228661–8664 ◂
8.
CohenJ, 1992“A power primer”Psychological Bulletin112155–159 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.-155 ◂
9.
Di LolloVBischofW F, 1995“Inverse-intensity effect in duration of visible persistence”Psychological Bulletin118223–237 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.223 ◂
10.
EaglemanD MSejnowskiT J, 2007“Motion signals bias position judgments: A unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump and Frohlich effects”Journal of Vision71–12 doi:10.1167/7.4.3 ◂
11.
GeislerW S, 1999“Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction”Nature40065–69 doi:10.1038/21886 ◂
12.
GoodaleM AMilnerA D, 1992“Separate visual pathways for perception and action”Trends in Neurosciences1520–25 doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 ◂
13.
HammettS TChampionR AThompsonP GMorlandA B, 2007“Perceptual distortions of speed at low luminance: Evidence inconsistent with a Bayesian account of speed encoding”Vision Research47564–568 doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.013 ◂
14.
KrekelbergBLappeM, 2000“A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process”Vision Research40201–215 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00168-6 ◂
15.
LandM FNilssonD E, 2002Animal eyes (New York: Oxford University Press) ◂
16.
MacKayD, 1958“Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects”Nature181507–508 doi:10.1038/181507a0 ◂
17.
MorganM, 1977“Differential visual persistence between the two eyes: A model for the Fertsch-Pulfrich effect”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3484–495 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.3.484 ◂
18.
NickallsR W, 1996“The influence of target angular velocity on visual latency difference determined using the rotating Pulfrich effect”Vision Research362865–2872 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(96)00039-9 ◂
19.
NijhawanR, 1994“Motion extrapolation in catching”Nature370256–257 doi:10.1038/370256b0 ◂
20.
PelliD G, 1997“The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies”Spatial Vision10437–442 doi:10.1163/156856897X00366 ◂
21.
PulfrichC, 1922“Die Stereoskopie im Dienste der isochromen und heterochromen Photometrie”Die Naturwissenschaften10569–574 doi:10.1007/BF01565573 ◂
22.
PurushothamanGPatelSBedellHOgmenH, 1998“Moving ahead through differential visual latency”Nature396424–424 doi:10.1038/24766 ◂
23.
TootellR BReppasJ BKwongK KMalachRBornR TBradyT JRosenB RBelliveauJ W, 1995“Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging”Journal of Neuroscience153215–3230 ◂
24.
Van SantenJ PSperlingG, 1984“Temporal covariance model of human motion perception”Journal of the Optical Society of America A1451–473 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.1.000451 ◂
25.
Van SantenJ PSperlingG, 1985“Elaborated Reichardt detectors”Journal of the Optical Society of America A2300–321 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.2.000300 ◂
26.
PashkamM VaziriCavanaghP, 2008“Apparent speed increases at low luminance”Journal of Vision81–12 doi:10.1167/8.16.9 ◂
27.
WatsonA BAhumadaA J, 1985“Model of human visual-motion sensing”Journal of the Optical Society of America A2322–341 doi:10.1364/JOSAA.2.000322 ◂
28.
WertheimerM, 1912“Experimentelle Studien uber das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie”61161–265 ◂
29.
WhiteALinaresDHolcombeA, 2008“Visuomotor timing compensates for changes in perceptual latency”Current Biology18R951–53 ◂
30.
WhitneyDMurakamiI, 1998“Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation”Nature Neuroscience1656–657 doi:10.1038/3659 ◂
31.
WhitneyDMurakamiICavanaghP, 2000“Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli”Vision Research40137–149 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00166-2 ◂
32.
WhitneyD, 2002“The influence of visual motion on perceived position”Trends in Cognitive Sciences6211–216 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01887-9 ◂
33.
WojtachWSungKTruongSPurvesD, 2008“An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences10516338–16343 doi:10.1073/pnas.0808916105 ◂
34.
ZekiS, 1991“Cerebral akinetopsia (visual motion blindness): A review”Brain114811–824 doi:10.1093/brain/114.2.811 ◂
