Interindividual variation has been shown in the rates at which subjects alternate in perception during viewing of binocular rivalry and other ambiguous figures. A similar pattern of interindividual variation is evident in the rate of eye movements. The aim of this study was to determine whether individual differences in the rate of binocular rivalry predict individual differences in the rate of eye movements. First, participants reported changes in perception during contour rivalry. We found that the alternation rate during rivalry varied from 0.15 to 0.59/s between individuals. Next, participants viewed different visual displays while their eye movements were tracked. We found that the rate of saccadic eye movements varied by 1.9–4.4/s between individuals. Although the temporal characteristics of eye movements and binocular rivalry differed in their absolute rate, we found a significant positive correlation between these measures; that is, the frequency of saccadic eye movements can predict an individual's rate of perceptual alternation during rivalry. These findings suggest a potential link between the mechanisms involved in binocular rivalry and those processes involved in controlling eye movements.
AndrewsT JCoppolaD M, 1999“Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments”Vision Research392947–2953 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00019-X ◂
CastelhanoM SHendersonJ M, 2008“Stable individual differences across images in human saccadic eye movements”Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale621–14 doi:10.1037/1196-1961.62.1.1 ◂
9.
CorbettaM, 1998“A common neural system to direct attention and the eye to visual locations”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences95831–838 doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.831 ◂
10.
HelmholtzH, 1925Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics Volume 3 Trans SouthallJ P C, (New York: Optical Society of America). (:) ◂
11.
HeringK E, 1964Outlines of a Theory of the Light Sense Trans HurvichL MJamesonD, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press) (:) ◂
KanaiRCarmelDBahramiBReesG, 2011“Structural and functional fractionation of right superior parietal cortex in bistable perception”Current Biology21R106–R107 ◂
14.
KleinschmidtABuchelCZekiSFrackowiakR S J, 1998“Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures”Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences2652427–2433 doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0594 ◂
15.
KnapenTBrascampJPearsonJvan EeRBlakeR, 2011“The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception”Journal of Neuroscience3110293–10301 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1727-11.2011 ◂
16.
LeopoldD ALogothetisN K, 1999“Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception”Trends in Cognitive Sciences3254–265 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7 ◂
17.
LumerE DReesE K JReesG, 1998“Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain”Science2801930–1934 doi:10.1126/science.280.5371.1930 ◂
18.
LumerE DReesG, 1999“Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences961669–1673 doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1669 ◂
19.
MillerSHansellNNgoTLiuGPettigrewJMartinNWrightM J, 2010“Genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1072664–2668 doi:10.1073/pnas.0912149107 ◂
20.
PettigrewJ DMillerS M, 1998“A ‘sticky’ interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder?”Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences2652141–2148 doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0551 ◂
21.
RaynerKLiXWilliamsC CCaveK RWellA D, 2007“Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects”Vision Research472714–2726 doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.007 ◂
22.
ReesGKreimanGKochC, 2002“Neural correlates of consciousness in humans”Nature Reviews Neuroscience3261–270 doi:10.1038/nrn783 ◂
23.
Sabrin HWKerteszA E, 1980“Microsaccadic eye movements and binocular rivalry”Perception & Psychophysics28150–154 doi:10.3758/BF03204341 ◂
24.
Sabrin HWKerteszA E, 1983“The effect of imposed fixational eye movements on binocular rivalry”Perception & Psychophysics34155–157 doi:10.3758/BF03211341 ◂
25.
ShannonR WPatrickC JJiangYBernatEHeS, 2011“Genes contribute to the switching dynamics of bistable perception”Journal of Vision111–7 doi:10.1167/11.3.8 ◂
26.
SterzerPKleinschmidtA, 2007“A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences104323–328 doi:10.1073/pnas.0609006104 ◂
27.
SterzerPKleinschmidtAReesG, 2009“The neural bases of multistable perception”Trends in Cognitive Sciences13310–318 doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.006 ◂
28.
van DamL C Jvan EeR, 2006a“Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry”Journal of Vision61172–1179 doi:10.1167/6.11.3 ◂
29.
van DamL C Jvan EeR, 2006b“The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry”Vision Research46787–799 doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.011 ◂
30.
van EeRvan DamL C JBrouwerG J, 2005“Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability”Vision Research4541–55 doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.030 ◂
31.
WadeN J, 1975“Binocular rivalry between single lines viewed as real images and afterimages”Perception & Psychophysics17571–577 doi:10.3758/BF03203971 ◂
32.
ZaretskayaNThielscherALogothetisN KBartelsA, 2010“Disrupting parietal function prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry”Current Biology202106–2111 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010-.10.046 ◂
