Spatial Arrangement in Texture Discrimination and Texture Segregation

Abstract

We investigated the role of spatial arrangement of texture elements in three psychophysical experiments on texture discrimination and texture segregation. In our stimuli, oriented Gabor elements formed an iso-oriented and a randomly oriented texture region. We manipulated (1) the orientation similarity in the iso-oriented region by adding orientation jitter to the orientation of each Gabor; (2) the spatial arrangement of the Gabors: quasi-random or regular; and (3) the shape of the edge between the two texture regions: straight or curved. In Experiment 1, participants discriminated an iso-oriented stimulus from a stimulus with only randomly oriented elements. Experiment 2 required texture segregation to judge the shape of the texture edge. Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 2 with Gabors of a smaller spatial extent in a denser arrangement. We found comparable performance levels with regular and quasi-random Gabor positions in the discrimination task but not in the segregation tasks. We conclude that spatial arrangement plays a role in a texture segregation task requiring shape discrimination of the texture edge but not in a texture discrimination task in which it is sufficient to discriminate an iso-oriented region from a completely random region.

Keywords

perceptual grouping perceptual organization texture perception Gabor arrays collinearity

References

Akaike

(1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

Bell

Gheorghiu

Hess

R. F.

, & Kingdom

(2011). Global shape processing involves a hierarchy of integration stages. Vision Research, 51, 1760–1766. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.003

Ben-Av

M. B.

Sagi

, & Braun

(1992). Visual attention and perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 277–294. doi:10.3758/BF03209145

Bergen

J. R.

, & Landy

M. S.

(1991). Computational modeling of visual texture segregation. In Landy

M. S.

& Movshon

J. A.

(Eds.), Computational models of visual processing (pp. 253–271). (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)

Bolker

B. M.

Brooks

M. E.

Clark

C. J.

Geange

S. W.

Poulsen

J. R.

Stevens

M. H. H.

, & White

J. S.

(2009). Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 127–135. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008

Caelli

(1985). Three processing characteristics of visual texture segmentation. Spatial Vision, 1, 19–30. doi:10.1163/156856885X00044

Claessens

P. M.

, & Wagemans

(2005). Perceptual grouping in Gabor lattices: proximity and alignment. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1446–1459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193649

Compton

B. J.

, & Logan

G. D.

(1993). Evaluating a computational model of perceptual grouping by proximity. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 403–421. doi:10.3758/BF03206783

Dakin

S. C.

, & Baruch

N. J.

(2009). Context influences contour integration. Journal of Vision, 9(2), 13. doi:10.1167/9.2.13

10.

Day

, & Loffler

(2009). The role of orientation and position in shape perception. Journal of Vision, 9(10), 14. doi:10.1167/9.10.14

11.

Demeyer

, & Machilsen

(2012). The construction of perceptual grouping displays using GERT. Behavioral Research Methods, 44, 439–446. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0167-8

12.

Field

D. J.

Hayes

, & Hess

R. F.

(1993). Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field.” Vision Research, 33, 173–193

13.

Gheorghiu

, & Kingdom

F. A.

(2009). Multiplication in curvature processing. Journal of Vision, 9(2), 23. doi:10.1167/9.2.23

14.

Giora

, & Casco

(2007). Region- and edge-based configurational effects in texture segmentation. Vision Research, 47, 879–886. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.009

15.

Hancock

, & Peirce

J. W.

(2008). Selective mechanisms for simple contours revealed by compound adaptation. Journal of Vision, 8(7), 11. doi:10.1167/8.7.11

16.

Harrison

S. J.

, & Keeble

D. R. T.

(2008). Within-texture collinearity improves human texture segmentation. Vision Research, 48, 1955–1964. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.008

17.

Jaeger

T. F.

(2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007

18.

Jain

A. K.

, & Farrokhnia

(1991). Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters. Pattern Recognition, 24, 1167–1186. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(91)90143-S

19.

Keeble

D. R.

Kingdom

F. A.

, & Morgan

M. J.

(1997). The orientational resolution of human texture perception. Vision Research, 37, 2993–3007. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00235-0

20.

Keeble

D. R.

Kingdom

F. A.

Moulden

, & Morgan

M. J.

(1995). Detection of orientationally multimodal textures. Vision Research, 35, 1991–2005. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00284-S

21.

Kehrer

, & Meinecke

(2003). A space-variant filter model of texture segregation: Parameter adjustment guided by psychophysical data. Biological Cybernetics, 88, 183–200. doi:10.1007/s00422-002-0369-3

22.

Kubovy

Holcombe

A. O.

, & Wagemans

(1998). On the lawfulness of grouping by proximity. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 71–98. doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0673

23.

Kubovy

, & Wagemans

(1995). Grouping by proximity and multistability in dot lattices: A quantitative Gestalt theory. Psychological Science, 6, 225–234. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00597.x

24.

Lamme

V. A. F.

Rodriguez-Rodriguez

, & Spekreijse

(1999). Separate processing dynamics for texture elements, boundaries and surfaces in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 406–413. doi:10.1093/cercor/9.4.406

25.

Landy

M. S.

(1996). Texture perception. In Adelman

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Retrieved December 14, 2012, from http://www.cns.nyu.edu/∼msl/papers/landy96.pdf

26.

Landy

M. S.

, & Bergen

J. R.

(1991). Texture segregation and orientation gradient. Vision Research, 31, 679–691. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(91)90009-T

27.

Landy

M. S.

, & Graham

(2004). Visual perception of texture. In Chalupa

L. M.

& Werner

J. S.

(Eds.), The visual neurosciences (Vol. 169; pp. 1106–1118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

28.

Machilsen

, & Wagemans

(2011). Integration of contour and surface information in shape detection. Vision Research, 51, 179–186. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.005

29.

Motoyoshi

, & Nishida

(2004). Cross-orientation summation in texture segregation. Vision Research, 44, 2567–2576. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.024

30.

Norman

L. J.

Heywood

C. A.

, & Kentridge

R. W.

(2011). Contrasting the processes of texture segmentation and discrimination with static and phase-reversing stimuli. Vision Research, 51, 2039–2047. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.021

31.

Nothdurft

H. C.

(1992). Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 355–375. doi:10.3758/BF03206697

32.

Pearson

P. M.

, & Kingdom

F. A. A.

(2001). On the interference of task-irrelevant hue variation on texture segmentation. Perception, 30, 559–569. doi:10.1068/p3184

33.

Quené

, & Van Den Bergh

(2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413–425. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.002

34.

Robol

Casco

, & Dakin

S. C.

(2012). The role of crowding in contextual influences on contour integration. Journal of Vision, 12(7), 3. doi:10.1167/12.7.3

35.

Sassi

Vancleef

Machilsen

Panis

, & Wagemans

(2010). Identification of everyday objects on the basis of Gaborized outline versions. i-Perception, 1, 121–142. doi:10.1068/i0384

36.

Schwarz

(1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 2, 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136

37.

Thielscher

, & Neumann

(2005). Neural mechanisms of human texture processing: Texture boundary detection and visual search. Spatial Vision, 18, 227–257. doi:10.1163/1568568053320594

38.

Treisman

(1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 194–214. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.8.2.194

39.

van Oeffelen

M. P.

, & Vos

P. G.

(1982). Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups. Memory & Cognition, 10, 396–404. doi:10.3758/BF03202432

40.

Wagemans

Elder

J. H.

Kubovy

Palmer

S. E.

Peterson

M. A.

Singh

, & von der Heydt

(2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. doi:10.1037/a0029333

41.

Wertheimer

(1938). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In Ellis

W. D.

(Ed), A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71–88). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co (Original work published 1923)

42.

Wolfson

S. S.

, & Landy

M. S.

(1995). Discrimination of orientation-defined texture edges. Vision Research, 35, 2863–2877. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00302-3

43.

Wolfson

S. S.

, & Landy

M. S.

(1998). Examining edge- and region-based texture analysis mechanisms. Vision Research, 38, 439–446