The pursuit-pursuing illusion is a visual illusion where a circular object placed in the centre of a radial pattern consisting of thin sectors is seen to move in the pursuit eye movement direction. The present study investigates the role of the surrounding texture, replacing the sectors with random dots or stripes in an orientation that was orthogonal, parallel or oblique to the pursuit direction. The experiments demonstrate that the acquired illusory effect was large for the orthogonal stripes. However, each surrounding texture produces a relatively smaller effect than the radial sectors. These results suggest that a hypothesis based on the property of a centre-surround relative-motion detector cannot fully explain the illusion and that the radial stimulus structure itself plays an important role in this illusion.
AllmanJ.MiezinF.McGuinnessE. (1985). Direction- and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (MT). Perception, 14(2), 105–126. doi:10.1068/p140105
2.
Anton-ErxlebenK.StephanV. M.TreueS. (2009). Attention reshapes center-surround receptive field structure in macaque cortical are MT. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2466–2478. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp002
3.
AshidaH. (2002). Spatial frequency tuning of the Ouchi illusion and its dependence on stimulus size. Vision Research, 42, 1413–1420. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00064-0
4.
BornR. T.TootellR. B. H. (1992). Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area. Nature, 357, 497–499. doi:10.1038/357497a0
5.
BornR. T.GrohJ. M.ZhaoR.LukasewyczS. J. (2000). Segregation of object and background motion in visual area MT: Effects of microstimulation on eye movements. Neuron, 26, 725–734. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81208-8
6.
EhrensteinW. (1941). Uber Abwandlungen der L. Hermannschen Helligkeitserscheinung. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 150, 83–91
7.
FilehneW. (1922). Uber das optische Wahrnehmen von Bewegungen. Z Sinnesphysiol, 53, 134–145
8.
FraserA.WilcoxK. J. (1979). Perception of illusory movement. Nature, 281, 565–566. doi:10.1038/281565a0
9.
FreemanT. C. A.BanksM. S. (1998). Perceived head-centric speed is affected by both extra-retinal and retinal errors. Vision Research, 38, 941–945. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00395-7
10.
GioraE.GoriS. (2010). The perceptual expansion of a filled area depends on textural characteristics. Vision Research, 50, 2466–2475. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.033
11.
GoriS.HamburgerK. (2006). A new motion illusion: The Rotating-Tilted-Lines illusion. Perception, 35, 853–857. doi:10.1068/p5531
12.
GoriS.HamburgerK.SpillmannL. (2006). Reversal of apparent rotation in the Enigma-figure with and without motion adaptation and the effect of T-junctions. Vision Research, 46, 3267–3273. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.009
13.
GoriS.StubbsD. A. (2006). A new set of illusions—the dynamic luminance-gradient illusion and the Breathing Light Illusion. Perception, 35, 1573–1577. doi:10.1068/p5668
14.
GoriS.YazdanbakhshA. (2008). The riddle of the Rotating-Tilted-Lines illusion. Perception, 37, 631–635. doi:10.1068/p5770
15.
GoriS.GioraE.YazdanbakhshA.MingollaE. (2011). A new motion illusion based on competition between two kinds of motion processing units: The Accordion Grating. Neural Networks, 24, 1082–1092. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2011.06.017
16.
GoriS.GioraE.YazdanbakhshA.MingollaE. (2013). The novelty of the “accordion grating illusion. Neural Networks, 39, 52. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2012.07.008
GurnseyR.PagéG. (2006). Effects of local and global factors in the Pinna illusion. Vision Research, 46, 1823–1837. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.011
19.
HamburgerK. (2007). Apparent rotation and jazzing in Leviant's Enigma Illusion. Perception, 36, 797–807. doi:10.1068/p5542
20.
ItoH.AnstisS.CavanaghP. (2009). Illusory movement of dotted lines. Perception, 38, 1405–1409. doi:10.1068/p6383
21.
ItoH. (2012). Illusory object motion in the centre of a radial pattern: The pursuit-pursuing illusion. i-Perception, 3, 59–87. doi:10.1068/i0430
22.
ItoH.TomimatsuE.BaiY. (2012). Properties common to the Enigma and pursuit-pursuing illusions. Japanese Psychological Review, 55, 336–345. (in Japanese with English abstract)
23.
KhangB. G.EssockE. A. (2000). Apparent swinging motion from a 2-D sinusoidal pattern. Perception, 29, 453–459. doi:10.1068/p3031
KitaokaA.AshidaH. (2003). Phenomenal characteristics of the peripheral drift illusion. Vision, 15, 261–262
26.
KitaokaA.AshidaH. (2007). A variant of the anomalous motion illusion based upon contrast and visual latency. Perception, 36(7), 1019–1035. doi:10.1068/p5362
27.
LeviantI. (1982). Illusory motion within still pictures: The L-effect. Leonardo, 15, 222–223
28.
LeviantI. (1996). Does “brain-power” make Enigma spin?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 263, 997–1001. doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0147
29.
MackayD. M. (1957). Moving visual images produced by regular stationary patterns. Nature, 180, 849–850. doi:10.1038/180849a0
30.
MurakamiI.ShimojoS. (1996). Assimilation-type and contrast-type bias of motion induced by the surround in a random-dot display: Evidence for center-surround antagonism. Vision Research, 36, 3629–3639. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(96)00094-6
31.
OuchiH. (1977). Japanese optical and geometrical art. New York: Dover
32.
PackC. C.HunterN.BornR. T. (2005). Contrast dependence of suppressive influences in cortical area MT of alert macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 1809–1815. doi:10.1152/jn.00629.2004
33.
PinnaB.BrelstaffG. J. (2000). A new visual illusion of relative motion. Vision Research, 16, 2091–2096. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00072-9
34.
PinnaB.SpillmannL. (2002). A new illusion of floating motion in depth. Perception, 31, 1501–1502. doi:10.1068/p3112pp
35.
PinnaB.SpillmannL. (2005). New illusions of sliding motion in depth. Perception, 34, 1441–1458. doi:10.1068/p3476
36.
PinnaB.SpillmannL.EhrensteinW. H. (2002). Scintillating lustre and brightness induced by radial lines. Perception, 31, 5–16. doi:10.1068/p3281
RaiguelS.Van HulleM. M.XiaoD. K.MarcarV. L.OrbanG. A. (1995). Shape and spatial distribution of receptive fields and antagonistic motion surrounds in the middle temporal area (V5) of the macaque. European Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 2064–2082. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00629.x
39.
RuzzoliM.GoriS.PavanA.PirulliC.MarziC. A.MniussiC. (2011). The neural basis of the Enigma illusion: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3648–3655. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.020
40.
ShioiriS.OnoH.SatoT. (2002). Adaptation to relative and uniform motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 19, 1465–1474. doi:10.1364/JOSAA19.001465
41.
SokoliukR.VanRullenR. (2013). The flickering wheel illusion: When α rhythms make a static wheel flicker. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 13498–13504. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5647-12.2013
42.
SpillmannL. (2013). The Ouchi-Spillmann illusion revisited. Perception, 42, 413–429
43.
TadinD.LappinJ. S.GilroyL. A.BlakeR. (2003). Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature, 424, 312–315. doi:10.1038/nature01800
44.
TadinD.SilvantoJ.Pascual-LeoneA.BattelliL. (2011). Improved motion perception and impaired spatial suppression following disruption of cortical area MT/V5. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1279–1283. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4121-10.2011
TakemuraH.AshidaH.AmanoK.KitaokaA.MurakamiI. (2012). Neural correlates of induced motion perception in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 14344–14354. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0570-12.2012
47.
TeraoM.MurakamiI. (2011). Compensation for equiluminant color motion during smooth pursuit eye movement. Journal of Vision, 11(6), 12 1–112. doi:10.1167/11.6.12
48.
TomimatsuE.ItoH. (2012). The relative motion aftereffect in the Enigma illusion. Perception 41 supplement (ECVP2012 abstracts), 91 doi:10.1068/v120600
49.
van der SmagtM. J.VerstratenF. A. J.PaffenC. L. E. (2010). Center-surround effects on perceived speed. Vision Research, 50, 1900–1904. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.06.012
50.
WertheimA. H. (1994). Motion perception during self-motion: The direct versus inferential controversy revisited. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 17, 293–355. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00034646
51.
XiaoD. K.RaiguelS.MarcarV.KoenderinkJ.OrbanG. A. (1995). Spatial heterogeneity of inhibitory surrounds in the middle temporal visual area. PNAS, 92, 11303–11306. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.24.11303
52.
XiaoD. K.RaiguelS.MarcarV.OrbanG. A. (1997). The spatial distribution of the antagonistic surround of MT/V5 Neurons. Cerebral Cortex, 7(7), 662–677. doi:10.1093/cercor/7.7.662
53.
YazdanbakhshA.GoriS. (2008). A new psychophysical estimation of the receptive field size. Neuroscience Letters, 438, 246–251. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.040
54.
YazdanbakhshA.GoriS. (2011). Mathematical analysis of the accordion grating illusion: A differential geometry approach to introduce the 3D aperture problem. Neural Networks, 24, 1093–1101. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2011.06.016
