“Exocentric pointing in the visual field” involves the setting of a pointer so as to visually point to a target, where both pointer and target are objects in the visual field. Phenomenologically, such pointings show systematic deviations from veridicality of several degrees. The errors are very small in the vertical and horizontal directions, but appreciable in oblique directions. The magnitude of the error is largely independent of the distance between pointer and target for stretches in the range 2–27°. A general conclusion is that the visual field cannot be described in terms of one of the classical homogeneous spaces, or, alternatively, that the results from pointing involve mechanisms that come after geometry proper has been established.
BerwaldL. (1941). On Finsler and Cartan geometries. III. Two-dimensional spaces with rectilinear extremals. Annals of Mathematics, 42(1), 84–112
2.
BoumaH.AndriessenJ. J. (1968). Perceived orientation of isolated line segments. Vision Research, 8, 493–507. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(68)90091-6
3.
CoxeterH. S. M. (1949). The real projective plane. New York: McGraw-Hill
4.
CoxeterH. S. M. (1961). Introduction to geometry. New York: Wiley
5.
CoxeterH. S. M. (1965). Non-Euclidean geometry. New York: Springer
6.
GirshickA. R.LandyM. S.SimoncelliE. P. (2011). Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 926–932. doi:10.1038/nn.2831
7.
GoonetillekeS. C.MezeyL. E.BurgessA. M.CurthoysI. S. (2008). On the relation between ocular torsion and visual perception of line orientation. Vision Research, 48, 1488–1496. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.012
8.
von HelmholtzH. (1867). Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Leipzig: L Voss
9.
HessR. F. (1982). Developmental sensory impairment: Amblyopia or tarachopia?Human Neurobiology, 1(1), 17–29
10.
JewellG.McCourtM. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 93–110. doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00045-7
11.
KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J. (2012). Gauge fields in pictorial space. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 5, 1213–1233
12.
KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J.LappinJ. S. (2000). Direct measurement of the curvature of visual space. Perception, 29, 69–79. doi:10.1068/p2921
MacLeanI. E.StaceyB. G. (1971). Judgment of angle size: An experimental appraisalPerception & Psychophysics, 9, 499–504. doi:10.3758/BF03208965
15.
McFarlandJ. H.ClarksonF. (1966). Perception of orientation: Adaptation to lateral body tiltAmerican Journal of Psychology, 79, 265–271
16.
MengX.QianN. (2005). The oblique effect depends on perceived, rather than physical, orientation and direction. Vision Research, 45, 3402–3413. doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.016
17.
QuinnP. (2004). Visual perception of orientation is categorical near vertical and continuous near horizontal. Perception, 33, 897–906. doi:10.1068/p3453
18.
RockI. (1954). The perception of the egocentric orientation of a line. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 367–374. doi:10.1037/h0057319
19.
SmythiesJ. (1996). A note on the concept of the visual field in neurology, psychology, and visual neuroscience. Perception, 25(3), 369–371. doi:10.1068/p250369
20.
WagemansJ.van DoornA. J.KoenderinkJ. J. (2011). Measuring 3D point configurations in pictorial space. i-Perception, 2, 77–111. doi:10.1068/i0420
21.
WenderothP.WhiteD. (1979). Angle-matching illusions and perceived line orientation. Perception, 8, 565–575. doi:10.1068/p080565
22.
WestheimerG.BeardB. L. (1998). Orientation dependency for foveal line stimuli: Detection and intensity discrimination, resolution, orientation discrimination and vernier acuity. Vision Research, 38, 1097–1103. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00248-4
