In the present study, the effects of depth order on forward and backward vection were examined using optical flows simulating motion in depth (i.e., approaching or receding). In an experiment, space extending 10 or 20 m in depth was simulated, and the space was divided into foreground and background spaces. In each space, a random-dot pattern was presented and the binocular disparity, size, and velocity of each dot were continuously manipulated in a way consistent with the depth being simulated. Participants reported whether they perceived vection. Latency, total duration (i.e., the amount of time that participants reported perceiving vection during a 60-s presentation), and strong-vection duration (i.e., the amount of time that participants reported perceiving strong vection) were measured. The results indicated that, even though the dots making up the optical flow were much smaller and slower moving in the background space than in the foreground space, vection was strongly dependent on flow motion in the background space. This supports the idea that the perceptual system uses background stimulus motion as a reliable cue for self-motion perception.
AndersenG. J. (1986). Perception of self-motion: Psychophysical and computational approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 52–65. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.99.1.52
2.
AndersenG. J.BraunsteinM. L. (1985). Induced self-motion in central vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 122–132. doi:10.1037/0096–1523.11.2.122
3.
BarmackN. H. (2003). Central vestibular system: Vestibular nuclei and posterior cerebellum. Brain Research Bulletin, 60, 511–541. doi:10.1016/S0361–9230(03)00055–8
4.
BerthozA.PavardB.YoungL. R. (1975). Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linear vection) basic characteristics and visual–vestibular interactions. Experimental Brain Research, 23, 471–489. doi:10.1007/BF00234916
5.
BrainardD. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897x00357
6.
BrandtT.DichgansJ.KoenigE. (1973). Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Experimental Brain Research, 16, 476–491. doi:10.1007/BF00234474
7.
BrandtT.WistE. R.DichgansJ. (1975). Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 497–503. doi:10.3758/BF03203301
8.
BronsteinA. M.BuckwellD. (1997). Automatic control of postural sway by visual motion parallax. Experimental Brain Research, 113, 243–248
9.
DelmoreA.MartinC. (1986). Roles of retinal periphery and depth periphery in linear vection and visual control of standing in humans. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 176–187. doi:10.1037/h0080091
10.
DichgansJ.SchmidtC. L.GrafW. (1973). Visual input improves the speedometer function of the vestibular nuclei in the goldfish. Experimental Brain Research, 18, 319–322. doi:10.1007/BF00234602
11.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin
12.
GuerrazM.BronsteinA. M. (2008). Mechanisms underlying visually induced body sway. Neuroscience Letters, 443, 12–16. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.07.053
13.
GuerrazM.GiannaC. C.BurchillP. M.GrestyM. A.BronsteinA. M. (2001). Effect of visual surrounding motion on body sway in a three-dimensional environment. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 47–58. doi:10.3758/BF03200502
HennV.YoungL. R.FinleyC. (1974). Vestibular nucleus units in alert monkeys are also influenced by moving visual fields. Brain Research, 71, 144–149. doi:10.1016/0006–8993(74)90198-X
16.
HoffmannK. P.DistlerC. (1986). The role of direction selective cells in the nucleus of the optic tract of cat and monkey during optokinetic nystagmus. In KellerE. L.ZeeD. S. (Eds.), Adaptive processes in visual and oculomotor systems (pp. 261–266). New York: Pergamon
17.
HowardI. P.HeckmannT. (1989). Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of two competing visual displays. Perception, 18, 657–665. doi:10.1068/p180657
18.
HowardI. P.HowardA. (1994). Vection: The contributions of absolute and relative visual motion. Perception, 23, 745–751. doi:10.1068/p230745
19.
IlgU. J. (1997). Slow eye movements. Progress in Neurobiology, 53, 293–329. doi:10.1016/S0301–0082(97)00039–7
20.
ItoH.ShibataI. (2005). Self-motion perception from expanding and contracting optical flows overlapped with binocular disparity. Vision Research, 45, 397–402. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.009
LeibowitzH. W.PostR. B.RodemerC. S.WadlingtonW. L.LundyR. M. (1980). Roll vection analysis of suggestion-induced visual field narrowing. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 173–176. doi:10.3758/BF03204344
23.
MeyerG. F.ShaoF.WhiteM. D.HopkinsC.RobothamA. J. (2013). Modulation of visually evoked postural responses by contextual visual, haptic and auditory information: A ‘virtual reality check’. PLoS ONE, 8(6): e67651. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067651
24.
NakamuraS. (2004). Effects of spatial arrangement of visual stimulus on inverted self-motion perception induced by the foreground motion: Examination of OKN-suppression hypothesis. Vision Research, 44, 1951–1960. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.03.004
25.
NakamuraS.ShimojoS. (1999). Critical role of foreground stimuli in perceiving visually induced self-motion (vection). Perception, 28, 893–902. doi:10.1068/p2939
26.
NakamuraS.ShimojoS. (2000). A slowly moving foreground can capture an observer's self-motion — A report of a new motion illusion: Inverted vection. Vision Research, 40, 2915–2923. doi:10.1016/S0042–6989(00)00149–8
27.
NakamuraS.ShimojoS. (2003). Sustained deviation of gaze direction can affect “inverted vection” induced by the foreground motion. Vision Research, 43, 745–749. doi:10.1016/S0042–6989(03)00081–6
28.
OhmiM.HowardI. P. (1988). Effect of stationary objects on illusory forward self-motion induced by a looming display. Perception, 17, 5–12. doi:10.1068/p170005
29.
OhmiM.HowardI. P.LandoltJ. P. (1987). Circular vection as a function of foreground–background relationships. Perception, 16, 17–22. doi:10.1068/p170005
30.
PalmisanoS. (1996). Perceiving self-motion in depth: The role of stereoscopic motion and changing-size cues. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 1168–1176. doi:10.3758/BF03207550
31.
PalmisanoS. (2002). Consistent stereoscopic information increases the perceived speed of vection in depth. Perception, 31, 463–480. doi:10.1068/p3321
32.
PalmisanoS.BurkeD.AllisonR. S. (2003). Coherent perspective jitter induces visual illusions of self-motion. Perception, 32, 97–110. doi:10.1068/p3468
33.
PalmisanoS.ChanA. Y. C. (2004). Jitter and size effects on vection are immune to experimental instructions and demands. Perception, 33, 987–1000. doi:10.1068/p5242
34.
PelliD. G. (1997). The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366
35.
PrevicF. H. (1992). The effects of dynamic visual stimulation on perception and motor control. Journal of Vestibular Research, 2, 285–295
36.
SenoT.ItoH.SunagaS. (2009). The object and background hypothesis for vection. Vision Research, 49, 2973–2982. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.017
37.
TelfordL.FrostB. (1993). Factors affecting the onset and magnitude of linear vection. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 682–692. doi:10.3758/BF03211744
38.
TelfordL.SpratleyJ.FrostB. (1992). Linear vection in the central visual field facilitated by kinetic depth cues. Perception, 21, 337–349. doi:10.1068/p210337
39.
WarrenW. H. (1995). Self-motion: Visual perception and visual control. In: EpsteinW.RogersS. (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 263–325). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
