The experiment was designed to investigate the effects of 2 s, 80 dB noise bursts on a five-choice serial response task, using ‘close’ analysis of data. A localised effect of noise burst onset was reported. This effect was confined to the distribution of ‘first responses’, following noise burst onset but not ‘offset’, and occurred on only a proportion of trials. Detailed analysis of the occurrence of the brief delays suggested that there was no systematic occurrence, that the information processing stage of the on-going serial response might be important, and, finally, that ‘distraction’ and not ‘paralysis’ provided a better description of the mechanism of the effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BillsA. C., 1931, “Blocking: A new principle in mental fatigue”, Am. J. Psychol., 43, 230–245
2.
BillsA. D., 1935, “Some causal factors in mental blocking”, J. exp. Psychol., 18, 172–185
3.
BroadbentD. E., 1957, “The effects of noise on behaviour”, in Handbook of Noise Control, Ed. HarrisC. M. (McGraw-Hill, New York), Chapter 10
4.
BroadbentD. E., 1958, perception and Communication (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
5.
BroadbentD. E., 1963a, “Differences and interactions between stresses”, Q. J. exp. Psychol., 15 (3), 205–211
6.
BroadbentD. E., 1963b, “Possibilities and difficulties with the concept of arousal” in Vigilance: A Symposium (McGraw-Hill, New York), Chapter 13
7.
BroadbentD. E., 1971, Decision and Stress (Academic Press, London)
8.
CarpenterA., 1964, “How does noise effect the individual”, Impulse, 24, 23–25
9.
FellerW., 1950, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (John Wiley, New York)
10.
FessardA.KurcharskiP., 1935, “Recherches sur le temps de reaction aux sauts de hauteurs et d'intensites differentes”, Ann. Psychol., 35, 103–117 (quoted by Broadbent, 1958)
11.
FordA., 1929, “Attention-automisation: An investigation of the traditional nature of mind”, Am. J. Psychol., 41, 1–32
12.
Goldman-EislerF., 1968, Psycholinguistics. Experiments in Spontaneous Speech (Academic Press, London)
13.
KryterK. D., 1950, “The effects of noise on man”, J. Sp. Dis., Monograph Supplementary, 1, 1–95
14.
LandisC.HuntW. A., 1939, The Startle Pattern (Farrar and Rhinehart, New York)
15.
LeonardA., 1959, “5-choice serial reaction apparatus”, M.R.C. A.P.R.U. Report No.326
16.
McGillW. J., 1963, “Stochastic latency mechanisms”, in Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Eds. BushR. R.GalanterE. (John Wiley, New York), vol.1
17.
MillerG., 1948, “The perception of short bursts of noise”, J. Acoust. Society of America, 20, 160
18.
MorganJ.J.B., 1916, “The over-coming of distraction and other resistances”, Arch. of Psychol., 5 (35), 1–84
19.
SokolovY. N., 1960, “Neuronal models and the orienting reflex”, in The Central Nervous System and Behaviour, Ed. BrazierM. A. (Joseph Macey Jr. Foundation, New York)
20.
StoneM., 1960, “Models for choice reaction time”, Psychometrika, 25, 251–260
21.
TeichnerH.AreesE.ReillyR., 1963, “Noise and human performance, a psychophysiological approach”, Ergonomics, 6, 83–97
22.
WelfordA., 1952, “The ‘psychological refractory period’ and the timing of high-speed performance—a review and a theory”, B. J. Psychol., 43, 2–19
23.
WelfordN., 1952, “An electronic digital recording machine: The SETAR”, J. of Sci. Instruments, 29, 1–4
