The somatosensory evoked response to vibrotactile stimuli was studied in 20 subjects. This type of response to stimuli of 1000 ms duration displays ‘on’ and ‘off’ components. The latter consists of a surface negative deflection of about 100–120 ms peak latency, followed by a slower positive wave. As in the averaged visual evoked response an afteractivity of frequency 8–10 Hz may follow the ‘on’ component. This activity may either mask the ‘off’ component, be initiated by the termination of the stimulus, or its rhythm can be interrupted by the stimulus end.
In view of the similarity between the averaged evoked response to visual and vibrotactile stimuli, it is suggested that visual and somatosensory information may be processed according to a common pattern.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
von BékésyG., 1967, Sensory Inhibition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), pp. 11, 31, 33, 116, 127
ClynesM.KohnM.LifshitzK., 1964, “Dynamics and spatial behavior of light evoked potentials, their modification under hypnosis, and on-line correlation in relation to rhythmic components”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 112, 468–509
4.
CohnR., 1964, “Rhythmic after-activity in visual evoked responses”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 112, 292–304
5.
CreutzfeldtO. D.KuhntU., 1972, “Electrophysiology and topographical distribution of visual evoked potentials in animals”, in Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Ed. JungR. (Springer–Verlag, Berlin), volume VII, pp. 595–646
6.
CreutzfeldtO. D.RosinaA.ItoM.ProbstW., 1969, “Visual evoked response of single cells and of the EEG in primary visual areas of the cat”, Journal of Neurophysiology, 32, 127–139
7.
EfronR., 1964, “Artificial synthesis of evoked responses to light flash”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 112, 292–304
8.
EhrenbergerK.FinkenzellerP.KeidelW. D.PlattigK. H., 1966, “Elektrophysiologische Korrelation der Stevensschen potenzfunktion und objektive Schwellenmessung am vibrationssinn des Menschen”, Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie, 290, 114–123
9.
FeinsodM.Bach-Y-RitaP.MadeyJ. M. J., 1973, “Somatosensory evoked responses—Latency differences in blind and sighted persons”, Brain Research, 60, 219–223
10.
FranzenO.OffenlochK., 1969, “Evoked response correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimates for tactile stimulation in man”, Experimental Brain Research, 8, 1–18
11.
GardnerE. P.SpencerW. A., 1972, “Sensory funneling. II. Cortical neuronal representation of patterned cutaneous stimuli”, Journal of Neurophysiology, 35, 954–977
12.
GranitR., 1955, Receptors and Sensory Perception (Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.), p. 85
13.
HallidayA. M.MichaelW. F., 1971, “Pattern–evoked potentials and the cortical representation of the visual field”, Excerpta Medica, number 253, 250–259
14.
HarterM. R., 1971, “Visually evoked cortical responses to the ‘on’ and ‘off’ set of patterned light in humans”, Vision Research, 11, 685–695
15.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N., 1968, “Receptive fields and functional architecture in monkey striate cortex”, Journal of Physiology, 195, 215–243
16.
JeffreysD. A.AxfordJ. G., 1972, “Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin”, Experimental Brain Research, 16, 1–21
17.
KooiK. A.BagchiB. K., 1964, “Visual evoked responses in man: Normative data”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 112, 254–269
18.
MacKayD. M., 1969, “Evoked brain potentials as indicators of sensory information processing”, Neurosciences Res. Prog. Bull., 7, 181–276
19.
MacKayD. M.JeffreysD. A., 1972, “Visually evoked potentials and visual perception in man”, in Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Ed. JungR. (Springer–Verlag, Berlin), volume VII, pp. 647–678
20.
MichaelW. F.HallidayA. M., 1971, “Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in man”, Brain Research, 32, 311–324
21.
NakanishiT.TakitaK.ToyokuraY., 1973, “Somatosensory evoked responses to tactile tap in man”, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 34, 1–6
22.
PeacockS. M.Jr., 1970, “Averaged ‘after-activity’ and the alpha regeneration cycle”, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, 287–295
23.
ReganD., 1972, Evoked Potentials in Psychology, Sensory Physiology and Clinical Medicine (John Wiley–Interscience, New York), pp. 114–117
24.
ShagassS., 1972, Evoked Brain Potentials in Psychiatry (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 49–61
25.
SpekreijseH.Van der TweelL. H.ReganD., 1972, “Interocular sustained suppression: Correlations with evoked potential amplitude and distribution”, Vision Research, 12, 521–526
26.
SpekreijseH.Van der TweelL. H.ZuidemaT., 1973, “Contrast evoked responses in man”, Vision Research, 13, 1577–1601
27.
WieselT. N.HubelD. H., 1966, “Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey”, Journal of Neurophysiology, 29, 1115–1156
28.
WurtzR. H., 1969, “Visual receptive fields of striate cortex neurons in awake monkeys”, Journal of Neurophysiology, 32, 722–742
