A theory is presented of how a driver might visually control his braking. A mathematical analysis of the changing optic array at the driver's eye indicates that the simplest type of visual information, which would be sufficient for controlling braking and would also be likely to be easily picked up by the driver, is information about time-to-collision, rather than information about distance, speed, or acceleration/deceleration. It is shown how the driver could, in principle, use visual information about time-to-collision in registering when he is on a collision course, in judging when to start braking, and in controlling his ongoing braking. Implications of the theory for safe speeds and safe following distances are discussed, taking into account visual angular velocity detection thresholds, and some suggestions are made as to how safety on the roads might be improved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BowerT G RBroughtonJ MMooreM K, 1970, “Infant responses to approaching objects: An indicator of response to distal variables”Perception and Psychophysics9193–196
2.
GibsonJ J, 1950The Perception of the Visual World (Boston: Houghton Mifflin)
3.
GibsonJ J, 1966The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Boston: Houghton Mifflin)
4.
GibsonJ J, 1968“What gives rise to the perception of motion?”Psychological Review75335–346
5.
GordonD A, 1966“Perceptual basis of vehicular guidance”Public Roads34 (3) 53–68
6.
HartmannE, 1972“The layout and perceptibility of vehicle rear light signals” (in Italian) in Proceedings of Symposium OCSE 1972Percezione e Presa di Decisione da Parte dell'Utente della Strada (Rome: Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici)
7.
HarveyL OMichonJ A, 1974“Detectability of relative motion as a function of exposure duration, angular separation and background”Journal of Experimental Psychology103 (2) 317–325
8.
Von HelmholtzH, 1925Physiological Opticsvolume 3, Ed. SouthallJ P C (New York: Optical Society of America)
9.
HermanRPottsR B, 1961“Single-lane traffic theory and experiments” in Theory of Traffic Flow Ed. HermanR (New York: Elsevier)
10.
The Highway Code, 1974 (London: HMSO)
11.
JanssenW H, 1972“The perception of manoeuvres of moving vehicles. Progress report IV: Perceptibility of relative sagittal motion on the basis of changes in apparent size or brightness of tail lights” report number IZF-1972-C6, Institute for Perception TNO, Soesterberg, Netherlands
12.
JanssenW H, 1974“The perception of manoeuvres of moving vehicles. Progress report VI (final report): Implications of psychophysical threshold measurements for the night driving situation” report number IZF-1974-C12, Institute for Perception TNO, Soesterberg, Netherlands
13.
JohanssonG, 1973“Monocular movement parallax and near-space perception”Perception2135–146
14.
LeeD N, 1974“Visual information during locomotion” in Perception: Essays in Honor of James J. Gibson Eds McLeodR BPickH L (New York: Cornell University Press)
15.
LeeD NLishmanJ R, 1975“Visual proprioceptive control of stance”Journal of Human Movement Studies187–95
16.
Melvill JonesGWattD G D, 1971“Muscular control of landing from unexpected falls in man”Journal of Physiology219729–737
17.
MortimerR G, 1970“Automotive rear lighting and signaling research: final report” report number HUF-05, University of Michigan, Highway Safety Research Institute, Ann Arbor
18.
PurdyW C, 1958“The hypothesis of psychophysical correspondence in space perception”PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms, number 58–5594)
19.
RockwellT HSaffordR R, 1966“Comparative evaluation of an amber-red tail-light system and the conventional system under night driving conditions” report number EES 272–1, The Ohio State University Systems Research Group, Columbus
20.
RoszbachR, 1972“Improving vehicle rear lighting and signalling” (in Italian) in Proceedings of Symposium OCSE 1972Percezione e Presa di Decisione da Parte dell'Utente della Strada (Rome: Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici)
21.
RutleyK SMaceD G W, 1969“An evaluation of a brake light display which indicates the severity of braking”RRL Report LR 287, Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berks
22.
SchiffW, 1965“Perception of impending collision: A study of visually directed avoidant behaviour”Psychological Monographs79 whole number 604
23.
SpurrR T, 1969“Subjective aspects of braking”Automobile Engineer5958–61
24.
Tschermak-SeyseneggA, 1939“Über Parallaktoskopie”Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere241455–469
