The role of apparent depth features and the proximity of the test lines to the adjacent contours in the actuation of the Ponzo illusion was examined. Six versions of the Ponzo figure were employed: a standard Ponzo figure and five modified figures in which the test lines varied in orientation (horizontal or vertical) and in location (inside or outside the converging contours). Both manipulations resulted in a significant decrease in the magnitude of the illusion in comparison to the standard Ponzo figure. The results suggest that the Ponzo illusion is significantly affected by contextual factors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DayR, 1972“Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation”Science1751335–1340
2.
FisherG H, 1967“A common principle relating the Müller-Lyer and the Ponzo illusions”American Journal of Psychology80626–631
3.
FisherG H, 1968“Gradients of distortion seen in the context of the Ponzo illusion and other contours”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology20212–217
4.
FisherG H, 1973“Toward a new explanation for geometric illusions: II. Apparent depth or contour proximity?”British Journal of Psychology64607–621
5.
GillamB, 1973“The nature of size scaling in the Ponzo and related illusions”Perception and Psychophysics14353–357
6.
GregoryR L, 1963“Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling”Nature (London)199678–680
7.
GregoryR LHarrisJ P, 1975“Illusion destruction by appropriate scaling”Perception4203–220
8.
HerrickR M, 1973“Psychophysical methodology: VI. Random method of limits”Perception and Psychophysics13548–554
9.
HumphreyN KMorganM J, 1965“Constancy and geometric illusions”Nature (London)206744–745
10.
KünnapasT M, 1955“Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line”Journal of Experimental Psychology50168–170
11.
LeibowitzH W, 1965Visual Perception (New York: Macmillan)
12.
LeibowitzH WBrislinRPerlmutterLHennessyR, 1969“Ponzo perspective illusion as a manifestation of space perception”Science19661174–1176
13.
RockIEbenholtzS, 1959“The relational determination of perceived size”Psychological Review66387–401
