Musicians and nonmusicians were required to make written reports of briefly presented displays of pitch symbols. Whilst musicians were not superior to nonmusicians at identifying individual notes they were superior at retaining information about the contour of note sequences. In addition, manipulation of task difficulty by requiring whole or partial report of the displays had a significant effect on performance only when global, rather than specific, response measures were taken. The results are in accordance with the theory that global analysis precedes detailed analysis in perceptual processing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportD A, 1968“The rate of assimilation of visual information”Psychonomic Science12 (6) 231–234
2.
AllportD A, 1977“On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report: The effects of visual masking” in Attention and Performance VI Ed. DornicS (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
3.
BroadbentD E, 1977“The hidden pre-attentive process”American Psychologist32109–118
4.
ChaseW GSimonH A, 1973“Perception in chess”Cognitive Psychology455–81
5.
ClarkH H, 1973“The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour12335–359
6.
ColtheartM, 1972“Visual information processing” in New Horizons in Psychology 2 Ed. FossB (Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin) pp 62–85
7.
EstesW K, 1975“The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General104 (2) 122–145
8.
GibsonE J, 1969Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development (New York: Appleton Century Crofts)
9.
MassaroD WKlitzkeD, 1977“Letters are functional in word identification”Memory and Cognition5 (3) 292–298
10.
NavonD, 1977“Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception”Cognitive Psychology9353–383
11.
SlobodaJ A, 1976a“Visual perception of musical notation: Registering pitch symbols in memory”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology281–16
12.
SlobodaJ A, 1976b“The effect of item position on the likelihood of identification by inference in prose reading and music reading”Canadian Journal of Psychology30 (4) 228–237
13.
SperlingG A, 1960“The information available in brief visual presentations”Psychological Monographs74 (4, 5) whole number 498