The idea that there is a single psychophysical function which describes how the human responds to stimulus intensity is rejected. The form of any empirical function depends upon the buried yet arbitrary assumption about how the stimuli are to be measured. Because psychophysical functions have this arbitrary basis, there can be no universal law, and further, no psychophysical function can reveal a general truth about the nervous system. The power law has been inappropriately reified; the descriptive usefulness of the power function has been incorrectly extended, perhaps because simplicity is appealing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonN HShanteauJ, 1977“Weak inference with linear models”Psychological Bulletin841155–1170.
2.
BirnbaumM H, 1973, “The devil rides again: Correlation as an index of fit”Psychological Bulletin81854–859.
3.
BoxG E PCoxD R, 1964, “An analysis of transformations”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B26211–243.
4.
BoxG E PTidwellP W, 1962, “Transformation of the independent variables”Technometrics4531–550.
5.
BruvoldW HGaffeyW R, 1965“Subjective intensity of mineral taste in water”Journal of Experimental Psychology69369–374.
6.
EkmanG, 1964“Is the power law a special case of Fechner's law?”Perceptual and Motor Skills19730.
7.
GoodI J, 1972“Correlation for power functions”Biometrics281127–1129.
8.
LuceR D, 1959“On the possible psychophysical laws”Psychological Review6681–95.
9.
MandelJ, 1964The Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data (New York: John Wiley)
10.
MarksL E, 1968“Stimulus-range, number of categories, and form of the category scale”American Journal of Psychology81467–479.
11.
PhillipsJ P N, 1964“A note on Treisman's model”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology16386.
12.
PradhanP LHoffmanP J, 1963“Effect of spacing and range of stimuli on magnitude estimation judgments”Journal of Experimental Psychology66533–541.
13.
RamsayJ O, 1977“Monotonic weighted power transformations to additivity”Psychometrika4283–109.
14.
ScloveS L, 1972“(Y vs. X) or (log Y vs. X)?”Technometrics14391–403.
15.
StevensJ CSavinH B, 1962“On the form of learning curves”Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior515–18.
16.
StevensS S, 1964“Concerning the psychophysical law”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology16383–385
17.
StevensS S, 1975Psychophysics (New York: John Wiley)
18.
TorgersonW S, 1960“Quantitative judgment scales” in Psychological Scaling: Theory and Applications Eds GulliksenHMessickS (New York: John Wiley)
19.
TreismanM, 1964“Sensory scaling and the psychophysical law”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology1611–22.
20.
TukeyJ W, 1977Exploratory Data Analysis (Reading, MA: Addison Wesley).
21.
WeissD J, 1972“Averaging: An empirical validity criterion for magnitude estimation”Perception & Psychophysics12385–388.
