The suppression effect observed in masking is assumed to be due to neural inhibition between two stimuli that interact spatially or within a narrow span of time in the fashion demonstrated in simultaneous brightness-contrast experiments. Three principles are brought together in a comprehensive mathematical model of visual masking. The three principles are: lateral inhibition, the integrated visual response function (VRF), and stimulus decay after its offset over a limited period of time (up to about 100 ms). Block's law is extended to apply to the integration of the VRF, including decay. The three principles combined are sufficient to explain well-known masking phenomena such as metacontrast, and forward and backward masking. The mathematical model presented demonstrates clearly the common underlying basis of all masking. The validity of the lesser documented decay after stimulus offset, a necessary assumption to explain masking effects with stimuli that are delayed relative to each other, is demonstrated with experimental evidence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlpernM, 1953“Metacontrast”Journal of the Optical Society of America43648–657.
2.
AverbachESperlingG, 1961“Short term storage of information in vision” in Information Theory Ed. CherryC (London: Butterworths) pp 196–211.
3.
BaumgardtESegalJ, 1942“Facilitation et inhibition parametres de la fonction visuelle”L'Année Psychologique43–4454–102.
4.
BoyntonR N, 1968“Some temporal factors in vision” in Contemporary Theory and Research in Visual Perception Ed. HaberR N (New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston) pp 170–182.
5.
BreitmeyerB G, 1972The Relation between the Detection of Size and Velocity in Human Visionunpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA.
6.
BreitmeyerB G, 1980“Unmasking visual masking: A look at the ‘why’ behind the veil of the ‘how’”Psychological Review8752–69.
7.
BreitmeyerB GGanzL, 1976“Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing”Psychological Review831–36.
8.
CollonierMRosignolS, 1969“Heterogeneity of the cerebral cortex” in Basic Mechanisms of the Epilepsies Eds JasperH HWardA APopeA (Boston, MA: little-Brown).
9.
CrawfordB H, 1947“Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B134283–302.
10.
CreutzfeldtOSakmanB, 1969“Neurophysiology of vision”Annual Review of Physiology31499–544.
11.
DiamondA L, 1953“Foveal simultaneous brightness contrast as a function of inducing and test field luminance”Journal of Experimental Psychology5304–314.
12.
GanzL, 1975“Temporal factors in visual perception” in Handbook of Perceptionvolume V Eds CarteretteE CFriedmanM P (New York: Academic Press) pp 169–231.
13.
HartlineH KRatliffF, 1957“Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of limulus”Journal of General Physiology40357–376.
14.
HeinemannE G, 1955“Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing and test-field luminance”Journal of Experimental Psychology5089–96.
15.
HeringE, 1872“Zur Lehre vom Lichtsinn. Über successive Lichtinduction”Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse66 Abt. III 5–24.
16.
HildrethJ D, 1973Bloch's law and a temporal integration model for simple reaction time to light”Perception & Psychophysics14421–432.
17.
JonesE GPowellT P S, 1970“An electronmicroscopic study of the laminar pattern and mode of termination of the afferent fibre pathways in the somatic sensory cortex of the cat”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B25745–62.
18.
KahnemanD, 1967“An onset-onset law for one case of apparent motion and metacontrast”Perception & Psychophysics2577–584.
19.
KellyD H, 1969“Flickering patterns and lateral inhibition”Journal of the Optical Society of America591361–1370.
20.
KellyD H, 1971a“Theory of flicker and transient responses. I. Uniform fields”Journal of the Optical Society of America61537–546.
21.
KellyD H, 1971b“Theory of flicker and transient responses. II. Counterphase gratings”Journal of the Optical Society of America61632–640.
22.
KolersP A, 1962“Intensity and contour effects in visual masking”Vision Research2277–294.
23.
KuhntUCreutzfeldtD O, 1971“Decreased post-synaptic inhibition in the visual cortex during flicker stimulationElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology3079–82.
24.
MachE, 1868“Über die physiologische Wirkung raumlich verheilter Lichtreize, III”Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch—naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften54393–408.
25.
MachE, 1866“Über die physiologische Wirkung raumlich verheilter Lichtreize, IV”Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch—naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften5711–19.
26.
MaffeiLCervettoLFiorentiniA, 1970“Transfer characteristics of excitation and inhibition in cat retinal ganglion cells”Journal of Neurophysiology33276–284.
27.
McDougallW, 1904“The variation of the intensity of visual sensations with the duration of the stimulus”British Journal of Psychology1151–159.
28.
RodieckR WStoneJ, 1965“Response of cat retinal ganglion cells to moving visual patterns”Journal of Neurophysiology28819–832.
29.
SherringtonC S, 1897“On reciprocal action in the retina as studied by means of rotating discs”Journal of Physiology2133–54.
30.
SchillerP HSmithM C, 1968“Monoptic and dichoptic metacontrast”Perception & Psychophysics3237–239.
31.
StiglerR, 1910“Chronophotische Studien über den Umgebungskontrast”Pfluegers Archiv für die Gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere134365–435.
32.
Sukale-WolfS, 1971The Prediction of the Metacontrast Phenomenon from Simultaneous Brightness Contrastunpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
33.
Von BékésyG, 1960“Neural inhibitory units of the eye and skin: Quantitative description of contrast phenomena”Journal of the Optical Society of America501060–1070.
34.
Von BékésyG, 1967Sensory Inhibition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
35.
WeissteinN, 1968“A Rashevsky—Landahl neural net: Stimulation of metacontrast”Psychological Review75494–521.
36.
WeissteinN, 1972“Metacontrast” in Handbook of Sensory Physiology Eds JamesonDHurvichL M, Volume VII, part 4 Visual Psychophysics (Berlin: Springer) pp 233–272.
37.
WeissteinN, 1975“A comparison and elaboration of two models of metacontrast”Psychological Review82325–343.
