The apparent stratification in depth of subjective contour figures over their backgrounds was investigated as a function of illumination level, figure size, and viewing distance. Magnitude estimation, with a real contour figure serving as the modulus, was used to measure the stratification in depth of a subjective contour figure over its background. Illumination level and retinal size both had significant effects on the depth stratification of the subjective contour figures. The greatest apparent depth differences were obtained for figures of small retinal size under low levels of illumination. These results paralleled previous findings for judgments of subjective contour strength. Consequently, both contour clarity and depth stratification of subjective contour figures are affected in similar ways by illumination level, figure size, and viewing distance. The implications of this response coupling are discussed in terms of current theories of subjective contours.
BradleyD RPetryH M, 1977“Organizational determinants of subjective contour: The subjective Necker cube”American Journal of Psychology90253–262
5.
BrignerW LGallagherM B, 1974“Subjective contour: Apparent depth or simultaneous brightness contrast?”Perceptual and Motor Skills381047–1053
6.
BrussellE MStoberS RBodingerD M, 1977“Sensory information and subjective contour”American Journal of Psychology90145–156
7.
CorenS, 1972“Subjective contours and apparent depth”Psychological Review79359–367
8.
CorenSPoracC, 1983“Subjective contours and apparent depth: A direct test”Perception & Psychophysics33(2) 197–200
9.
CorenSTheodoreL, 1975“Subjective contour: The inadequacy of brightness contrast as an explanation”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society687–89
10.
DayR HJoryM K, 1978“Subjective contours, visual acuity and line contrast” in Visual Psychophysics and Physiology Eds ArmingtonJ CKrauskopfJWootenB R (New York: Academic Press)
11.
DayR HJoryM K, 1980“A note on the second stage in the formation of illusory contours”Perception & Psychophysics2789–91
12.
DayR HKasperczykR T, 1983“Amodal completion as a basis for illusory contours”Perception & Psychophysics33355–364
13.
DumaisS TBradleyD R, 1976“The effects of illumination level and retinal size on the apparent strength of subjective contours”Perception & Psychophysics19339–345
14.
EgusaH, 1982“Effect of brightness on perceived distance as a figure–ground phenomenon”Perception11671–676
GregoryR LHarrisJ P, 1974“Illusory contours and stereo depth”Perception & Psychophysics15411–416
20.
HalpernD F, 1981“The determinants of illusory-contour perception”Perception10191–213
21.
HarrisJ PGregoryR L, 1973“Fusion and rivalry of illusory contours”Perception2235–247
22.
JoryM KDayR H, 1979“The relationship between brightness contrast and illusory contours”Perception83–9
23.
JuleszBFrisbyJ P, 1975“Some new subjective contours in random-line stereograms”Perception4145–150
24.
KanizsaG, 1955“Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogènea”Rivista di Psicologia497–30
25.
KanizsaG, 1974“Contours without gradients or cognitive contours?”Italian Journal of Psychology1193–113
26.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision Praeger Special Studies (New York: Praeger)
27.
KennedyJ M, 1975“Depth at an edge, coplanarity, slant depth, change in direction and change in brightness in the production of subjective contours”Italian Journal of Psychology2107–123
28.
KennedyJ M, 1976“Attention brightness in the constructive eye” in Vision and Artifact Ed. HenleM (New York: Springer)
29.
KennedyJ MLeeH, 1976“A figure-density hypothesis and illusory contour brightness”Perception5387–392
