According to a number of theories subjective contours arise from brightness contrast and/or assimilation. The apparent brightness gradients generated by these effects are assumed to give rise to the perception of contours delineating the gradients. A study is reported in which naive observers were shown a subjective contour display and asked to report what they saw. They were then asked to judge whether the center or the surround of the display appeared brighter. Subjects whose reports indicated that they had seen the subjective contour figure showed an overwhelming preference for the center of the display being brighter than the surround. However, subjects who did not see the subjective contour figure did not differ significantly in their selection of the center over the surround. This finding presents difficulties for any theory which derives subjective contours from the apparent brightness difference.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BradleyD R, 1982“Binocular rivalry of real versus subjective contours”Perception & Psychophysics3285–87.
2.
BradleyD R, 1983“Nuove osservazioni sui margini soggettivi”Giornale Italiano di PsicologiaX329–358.
3.
BradleyD RBradleyT DMcGrathS GCutcombS D, 1979“Type I error rate of the chi-square test of independence in R x C contingency tables that have small expected frequencies”Psychological Bulletin861290–1297.
4.
BradleyD RCutcombS D, 1977“Monte Carlo simulations and the chi-square test of independence”Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation9193–201.
BradleyD RDumaisS T, 1984“The effects of illumination level and retinal size on the depth stratification of subjective contour figures”Perception13155–164.
7.
BradleyD RDumaisS TPetryH M, 1976“Reply to Cavonius”Nature (London)26177–78.
BradleyD RPetryH M, 1977“Organizational determinants of subjective contour: The subjective Necker cube”American Journal of Psychology90253–262.
10.
BrignerW LGallagherM B, 1974“Subjective contour: Apparent depth or simultaneous brightness contrast?”Perceptual and Motor Skills381047–1053.
11.
CamilliGHopkinsK D, 1978“Applicability of chi-square to 2 × 2 contingency tables with small expected cell frequencies”Psychological Bulletin85163–167.
12.
CamilliGHopkinsK D, 1979“Testing for association in 2 × 2 contingency tables with very small sample sizes”Psychological Bulletin861011–1014.
13.
CorenS, 1972“Subjective contours and apparent depth”Psychological Review79359–367.
14.
DayR HJoryM K, 1978“Subjective contours, visual acuity and line contrast” in Visual Psychophysics and Physiology Eds ArmingtonJ CKrauskopfJWootenB R, (New York: Academic Press).
15.
DayR HJoryM K, 1980“A note on the second stage in the formation of illusory contours”Perception & Psychophysics2789–91.
16.
DayR HKasperczykR T, 1983“Amodal completion as a basis for illusory contours”Perception & Psychophysics33355–364.
17.
DumaisS TBradleyD R, 1976“The effects of illumination level and retinal size on the apparent strength of subjective contours”Perception & Psychophysics19339–345.
GregoryR LHarrisJ P, 1974“Illusory contours and stereo depth”Perception & Psychophysics15411–416.
21.
HarrisJ PGregoryR L, 1973“Fusion and rivalry of illusory contours”Perception2235–247.
22.
JoryM KDayR H, 1979“The relationship between brightness contrast and illusory contours”Perception83–9.
23.
JuleszBFrisbyJ P, 1975“Some new subjective contours in random-line stereograms”Perception4145–150.
24.
KanizsaG, 1955“Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogènea”Rivista di Psicologia497–30.
25.
KanizsaG, 1974“Contours without gradients or cognitive contours?”Italian Journal of Psychology193–113.
26.
KennedyJ MLeeH, 1976“A figure-density hypothesis and illusory contour brightness”Perception5387–392.
27.
LarntzK, 1978“Small-sample comparisons of exact levels for chi-squared goodness-of-fit statistics”Journal of the American Statistical Association73252–263.
28.
LawsonR BCowanEGibbsT DWhitmoreC G, 1974“Stereoscopic enhancement and erasure of subjective contours”Journal of Experimental Psychology1031142–1146.
29.
MeyerG EPhillipsD, 1980“Faces, vases, subjective contours, and the McCollough effect”Perception9603–606.
30.
RockIAnsonR, 1979“Illusory contours as the solution to a problem”Perception8665–681.
