A study is reported in which the significance for vision of low- and high-spatial-frequency components of photographic positive and negative images was investigated by measuring recognition of bandpass-filtered photographs of faces. The results show that a 1.5 octave bandpass-filtered image contains sufficient visual information for good recognition performance, provided the filter is centred close to 20 cycles facewidth−1. At low spatial frequencies negatives are more difficult to recognize than positives, but at high spatial frequencies there is no difference in recognition, implying that it is the low-frequency components of negatives which present difficulties for the visual system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BraddickOCampbellF WAtkinsonJ, 1978“Channels in vision: Basic aspects” in Handbook of Sensory Physiology volume 8 Eds HeldRLeibowitzH WTeuberH L, (New York: Springer) pp 3–38.
2.
BrettelHCaelliTHilzRRentschlerI, 1982“Modelling perceptual distortion: Amplitude and phase transmission in the human visual system”Human Neurobiology161–67.
3.
BurrD C, 1980“Sensitivity to spatial phase”Vision Research20391–396.
4.
BurrD C, 1981“Temporal summation of moving images by the human visual system”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B211321–339.
5.
CampbellF W, 1980“The physics of visual perception”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B2905–9.
6.
CampbellF WMaffeiL, 1974“Contrast and spatial frequency”Scientific American231106–114.
7.
CrawfordB H, 1947“Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B134283–302.
8.
FiorentiniAMaffeiLSandiniG, 1983“The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception”Perception12195–201.
9.
GalperR E, 1970“Recognition of faces in photographic negative”Psychonomic Science19207–208.
10.
GalperR EHochbergJ, 1971“Recognition memory for photographs of faces”American Journal of Psychology84351–354.
11.
GinsburgA P, 1980“Specifying relevant spatial information for image evaluation and display design: An explanation of how we see certain objects”Proceedings of the SID21219–227.
12.
JuleszB, 1980“Spatial-frequency channels in one-, two-, and three-dimensional vision: Variations on a theme by Bekesy” in Visual Coding and Adaptability Ed HarrisC S, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 263–317.
13.
LaugheryK RAlexanderJ FLaneA B, 1971“Recognition of human faces: Effects of target exposure time, target position, and type of photograph”Journal of Applied Psychology55477–485.
14.
LuriaS MStraussM S, 1978“Comparison of eye movements over faces in photographic positives and negatives”Perception7349–358.
15.
MarrD, 1982Vision (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman).
16.
OppenheimA VLimJ S, 1981“The importance of phase in signals”Proceedings of the IEEE69529–541.
17.
PhillipsR J, 1972“Why are faces hard to recognize in photographic negative?”Perception & Psychophysics12425–426.
18.
PiotrowskiL NCampbellF W, 1982“A demonstration of the visual importance and flexibility of spatial-frequency amplitude and phase”Perception11337–346.
19.
ShapleyRGordonJ, 1985“Nonlinearity in the perception of form”Perception & Psychophysics3784–88.
20.
SutherlandN S, 1971“Visual recognition of objects” paper read at the British Psychological Society London Conference, 1971.
21.
TiegerTGanzL, 1979“Recognition of faces in the presence of two-dimensional sinusoidal masks”Perception & Psychophysics26163–167.
