The causal flows between the processes responsible for illusory contour clarity, brightness, and apparent depth in the Kanizsa square were examined. The sixty-four stimuli used consisted of all possible combinations of eight disk luminances and eight centre-to-centre separations between nearest disks. Ten subjects were instructed to rate the clarity of the illusory contour and the brightness and apparent depth differences between the Kanizsa square and its surround in each stimulus. On the basis of results obtained with the causal inference method, using partial correlations and path analysis, it is suggested that clarity of illusory contour can be influenced directly by disk separation, and that the output from the process responsible for illusory contour clarity has some effect on the processes responsible for the apparent depth and brightness differences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsherH B, 1976Causal Modeling (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
2.
BachmannT, 1978“Problems of interaction and perception”Transactions of the State University of Tartu: Studies in Psychology731–60.
3.
BlalockH M, 1962“Four-variable causal models and partial correlations”American Journal of Sociology68182–194.
4.
BrignerW LGallagherM B, 1974“Subjective contour: Apparent depth or simultaneous brightness contrast?”Perceptual and Motor Skills381047–1053.
5.
BrussellE MStoberS RBodingerD M, 1977“Sensory information and subjective contours”American Journal of Psychology90145–156.
6.
CorenS, 1972“Subjective contours and apparent depth”Psychological Review79359–367.
7.
CorenS, 1974“Reply to Banks and Coffin”Psychological Review81266.
8.
CorenSWardL M, 1979“Levels of processing of visual illusions: The combination and interaction of distortion-processing mechanisms”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance5324–335.
9.
DayR HJoryM K, 1978“Subjective contours, visual acuity, and line contrast” in Visual Psychophysics and Physiology: A Volume Dedicated to Lorrin Riggs Eds ArmingtonJ CKrauskopfJWootenB R, (New York: Academic Press) pp 331–340.
10.
DayR HJoryM K, 1980“A note on a second stage in the formation of illusory contours”Perception & Psychophysics2789–91.
11.
DumaisS TBradleyD R, 1976“The effects of illumination level and retinal size on the apparent strength of subjective contours”Perception & Psychophysics19339–345.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception (New York: Praeger).
22.
KerlingerF NPedhazurE J, 1973Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).
23.
OyamaT, 1974a“Inference of causal relations in perception of space and motion”Psychologia (Kyoto)17166–178.
24.
OyamaT, 1974b“Perceived size and perceived distance in stereoscopic vision and an analysis of their causal relations”Perception & Psychophysics16175–181.
25.
OyamaT, 1977“Analysis of causal relations in the perceptual constancies” in Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception Ed. EpsteinW, (New York: John Wiley) pp 183–216.
26.
OyamaTKikuchiTIchiharaS, 1981“Span of attention, backward masking, and reaction time”Perception & Psychophysics29106–112.
27.
ParksT E, 1980“Subjective figures: Some unusual concomitant brightness effects”Perception9239–241.
28.
ParksT E, 1984“Illusory figures: A (mostly) atheoretical review”Psychological Bulletin95282–300.
29.
ParksT EMarksW, 1983“Sharp-edged vs. diffuse illusory circles: The effects of varying luminance”Perception & Psychophysics33172–176.
30.
ParksT EMarksW, 1985“Illusory figures: Individual differences in apparent depth and lightness”Perception & Psychophysics37529–532.
31.
ReynoldsR I, 1981“Perception of an illusory contour as a function of processing time”Perception10107–115.
32.
RichardsonB L, 1979“The nonequivalence of abrupt and diffuse illusory contours”Perception8589–593.
33.
RonchiLMoriG F, 1959“On the factors which affect the contrast enhancement in a figure with ‘quasi-perceptive contours’ and a practical application of such a figure”Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi, Atti14495–508.
34.
SchumannF, 1904“Einige Beobachtungen über die Zusammenfassung von Gesichtseindrücken zu Einheiten [Some observations on the grouping of visual impressions into wholes]”Psychologische Studien11–32.
35.
SimonH A, 1954“Spurious correlation: A causal interpretation”Journal of the American Statistical Association49467–479.
36.
TreismanA, 1986“Properties, parts, and objects” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Volume 2, Cognitive Processes and Performance Eds BoffK RKaufmanLThomasJ P, (New York: John Wiley) p 35–44.
37.
WareCKennedyJ M, 1977“Illusory line linking solid rods”Perception6601–602.
