Subjective contours and brightness enhancement in Ehrenstein-like situations are affected by pattern orientation. If a classic Ehrenstein pattern (with four inducing elements for every gap at intersection points) is observed, a number of anomalous illusory patches usually appear in these gaps, but if the same pattern is observed tilted by 45° the patches disappear and it is possible to see an illusory grid of horizontal and vertical ‘streets’. These two perceptual results are mutually exclusive. In a Koffka-cross variant of this pattern, the illusory patches, which are usually square, appear more rounded in the tilted pattern. All these results were confirmed in two experiments by means of a magnitude estimation procedure. It is suggested that the formation of a subjective contour is easier along horizontal and vertical directions and more difficult in an oblique direction, and that this phenomenon, as well as other visual acuity oblique effects, depends in part on the basic functioning of the visual system at the level of sensation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppelleS, 1972“Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The ‘oblique effect’ in man and animals”Psychological Bulletin78266–278
2.
BachmannT, 1978“Cognitive contours: Overview and a preliminary theory”Tarturilkliku Olikooli Toimetised (Acta et Commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis)47431–60
3.
BanksM SStolarzS S, 1975“The effect of head tilt on meridional differences in acuity: Implications for orientation constancy”Perception & Psychophysics1717–22
4.
BerbaumKChungC S, 1981“Perceptive field sizes and a new version of the Hermann grid”Perception1085–89
5.
BozziP, 1978“L'interosservazione come metodo per la fenomenologia sperimentale”Giornale Italiano di Psicologia5229–236
6.
BraddickOCampbellF WAtkinsonJ, 1978“Channels in vision: Basic aspects” in Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Volume 8, Perception Eds HeldRLeibowitzH WTeuberH L (Berlin: Springer) pp 3–38
7.
CampbellF WKulikowskiJ J, 1966“Orientation selectivity of the human visual system”Journal of Physiology (London)187437–445
8.
CampbellF WRobsonJ G, 1968“Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings”Journal of Physiology (London)197551–566
9.
CorwinT RMoskowitz-CookAGreenM A, 1977“The oblique effect in a vernier acuity situation”Perception & Psychophysics21445–449
10.
DayR H, 1983“Neon color spreading, partially delineated borders, and the formation of illusory contours”Perception & Psychophysics34488–490
11.
DayR HJoryM K, 1980“A note on a second stage in the formation of illusory contours”Perception & Psychophysics2789–91
12.
DumaisS TBradleyD R, 1976“The effects of illumination level and retinal size on the apparent strength of subjective contours”Perception & Psychophysics19339–345
13.
EhrensteinW, 1941“Über Abwandlungen der L. Hermannschen Helligkeitserscheinung”Zeitschrift für Psychologie15083–91
14.
EssockE A, 1980“The oblique effect of stimulus identification considered with respect to two classes of oblique effects”Perception937–46
15.
EssockE ALehmkuhleS, 1982“The oblique effects of pattern and flicker sensitivity: Implications for mixed physiological input”Perception11441–455
16.
GillamB, 1987“Perceptual grouping and subjective contours” in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer) pp 268–273
GrossbergSMingollaE, 1985“Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading”Psychological Review92173–211
19.
GrossbergSMingollaE, 1987“Neural dynamics of surface perception: Boundary webs, illuminants, and shape-from-shading”Computer vision, graphics, and image processing37116–165
20.
HalpernD FSalzmanB, 1983“The multiple determination of illusory contours: I. A review”Perception12281–291
21.
HalpernD FSalzmanBHarrisonWWidamanK, 1983“The multiple determination of illusory contours: 2. An empirical investigation”Perception12293–303
22.
HermannL, 1870“Eine Erscheinung des simultanen Kontrastes”Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere313–45
23.
HigginsG CStultzK, 1948“Visual acuity as measured with various orientations of a parallel-line test object”Journal of the Optical Society of America38756–758
24.
KanizsaG, 1955“Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogenea”Rivista di Psicologia497–30
25.
KanizsaG, 1974“Contours without gradient or cognitive contours?”Italian Journal of Psychology193–113
KanizsaGMinguzziG F, 1984“Contrasto e assimilazione di chiarezza” in Fenomenologia Sperimentale della Visione Ed. KanizsaG (Milano: Angeli) pp 73–96
28.
KennedyJ M, 1976“Sun figure: An illusory diffuse contour resulting from an arrangement of dots”Perception5479–481
29.
KennedyJ M, 1978“Illusory contours and the ends of lines”Perception7605–607
30.
KennedyJ M, 1979“Subjective contours, contrast, and assimilation” in Perception and Pictorial Representation Eds NodineC FFisherD F (New York: Praeger) pp 167–195
31.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt Brace)
32.
LindmanH R, 1974Analysis of Variance in Complex Experimental Design (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman)
33.
LuriaS M, 1963“The effect of body-position on meridional variations of scotopic acuity”American Journal of Psychology76598–606
34.
McCourtM E, 1982“A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect”Vision Research22119–134
35.
OgilvieJ CTaylorM M, 1959“Effect of length of line on the visibility of a fine line”Journal of the Optical Society of America49898–901
36.
PastoreN, 1971Selective History of Theories of Visual Perception 1650–1950 (New York: Oxford University Press)
37.
PetrySHarbeckAConwayJLeveyJ, 1983“Stimulus determinants of brightness and distinctness of subjective contours”Perception & Psychophysics34169–174
38.
PetrySMeyerG E, 1987“Top-down and bottom-up: The illusory contour as a microcosm of issues in perception” in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer) pp 3–20
39.
PrandtlA, 1927“Über gleichsinnige Induktion und die Lichtverteilung in gitterartigen Mustern”Zeitschrift fürSinnesphysiologie58263–307
40.
PurghéFRussoA, “Further observations on the Münsterberg ‘shifted chequerboard illusion”’ submitted to Perceptual and Motor Skills
41.
RediesCSpillmannL, 1981“The neon color effect in the Ehrenstein illusion”Perception10667–681
42.
SambinM, 1974“Angular margins without gradient”Italian Journal of Psychology1355–361
43.
SambinM, 1980Le Disomogeneità Indotte nella Formazione di Margini e Superfici Anomale Reports from the Institute of Psychology, University of Trieste, Italy pp 1–33
44.
SambinM, 1985“Figure anomale: La misura dell'ampiezza di una disomogeneità indotta” in Conoscenza e Struttura. Festschrift für Gaetano Kanizsa Ed. GerbinoW (Bologna: il Mulino) pp 437–452
45.
SchumannF, 1900“Beiträge zur Analyse der Gesichtswahrnehmungen”Zeitschrift für Psychologie231–32
46.
SpillmannL, 1975“Perceptual modification of the Ehrenstein illusion” in Gestalttheorie in der Modernen Psychologie Eds ErtelSKemmlerLStadlerM (Darmstadt: Steinkopff) pp 210–218
47.
SpillmannL, 1976“Contrast and brightness in illusions” in Spatial Contrast Eds SpekreijseHvan der TweelH (Amsterdam: North Holland) pp 45–49
48.
SpillmannLLevineJ, 1971“Contrast enhancement in a Hermann grid with variable figure—ground ratio”Experimental Brain Research13547–559
