It was proposed that stimulus organization of a set of homogeneous items can best be measured by using the mean distance to nearest neighbours. Patterns of dots were generated that fell on four different positions along the cluster continuum, from highly regular, through random, to clustered. When thirty subjects were asked to judge numerosity, their estimates decreased signicantly as cluster measures increased. Four possible interpretations of the effect of organization on numerosity perception are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BirnbaumMVeitC, 1973“Judgmental illusion produced by contrast with expectancy”Perception & Psychophysics13149–152
2.
BrunswikE, 1934Wahrnehmung und Gegenstandswelt (Leipzig: Deuticke)
3.
CousinsJ BGinsburgN, 1983“Subjective correlation and the regular-random numerosity illusion”Journal of General Psychology1083–10
4.
DiggleP, 1983Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns (New York: Academic Press)
5.
DonaldG, 1987The Capacity for Production and Discrimination of Random Visual ArrangementsMA Thesis, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
6.
FrithC DFrithU, 1972“The solitaire illusion: An illusion of numerosity”Perception & Psychophysics11409–410
7.
GarnerW, 1974The Processing of Information and Structure (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum)
8.
GinsburgN, 1976“Effect of item arrangement on perceived numerosity: Randomness vs regularity”Perceptual and Motor Skills43663–668
9.
GinsburgNGoldsteinS R, 1987“Measurement of visual cluster”American Journal of Psychology100193–203
10.
GinsburgNNichollsA, 1988“Perceived numerosity as a function of item size”Perceptual and Motor Skills67656–658
11.
GinsburgNWiegersmaS, 1991“Response bias and the generation of random sequences”Perceptual and Motor Skills721332–1334
12.
PielouE, 1969Introduction to Mathematical Ecology (New York: John Wiley)
13.
PollackRBrennerM (Eds), 1969The Experimental Psychology of Alfred Binet (New York: Springer)
14.
VosPVan OeffelenM PTiboschH JAllikJ, 1988“Interactions between area and numerosity”Psychological Research50148–154
15.
WatlerC, 1984The Consequences of Arrangement for Visual PerceptionMA Thesis, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
