The processing of different dimensions of a single stimulus may be either integral or separable. Dimensions are called integral if correlated variation of one improves discrimination on the basis of the other and random variation of one interferes with discrimination on the basis of the other. For separable dimensions on the other hand, subjects can attend to one dimension and disregard variations in the other. These discrimination tests were used to find the interactions between the processing of the visual dimensions of position, width, and contrast of a light bar stimulus. The relations between these dimensions were found to be asymmetric-judgments of position and width are independent of contrast variations, but variations in these dimensions influence contrast discriminations. Furthermore, position variations influence width judgements more than vice versa. The data were analyzed for repetition effects, and it was found that this model is not sufficient to explain all the interaction phenomena. The asymmetries found may be related to the different ways these dimensions are mapped onto cortical neuron responses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttneaveF, 1950“Dimensions of similarity”American Journal of Psychology63516–556
2.
BertelsonP, 1961“Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology1390–102
3.
BertelsonP, 1963“S—R relations and reaction time to new versus repeated signals in a series task”Journal of Experimental Psychology65478–484
4.
BraddickO J, 1974“A short range process in apparent motion”Vision Research14519–527
5.
BraddickO J, 1980“Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B290137–151
6.
ClarkH HBrownellH H, 1975“Judging up and down”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1339–352
7.
ClarkH HBrownellH H, 1976“Position, direction and their perceptual integrality”Perception & Psychophysics19328–334
8.
DickMHochsteinS, 1988“Interactions in the discrimination and absolute judgement of orientation and length”Perception17177–189
9.
DykesJ RCooperR G, 1978“An investigation of the perceptual basis of redundancy gain and orthogonal interference for integral dimensions”Perception & Psychophysics2336–42
10.
FelfoldyG L, 1974“Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli”Perception & Psychophysics15453–459
11.
FelfoldyG LGarnerW R, 1971“The effects on speeded classification of implicit and explicit instructions regarding redundant dimensions”Perception & Psychophysics9289–292
12.
GarnerW R, 1969“Speed of discrimination with redundant stimulus attributes”Perception & Psychophysics6221–224
13.
GarnerW R, 1974“The processing of information and structure”The Experimental Psychology Series (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.)
14.
GarnerW R, 1983“Asymmetric interactions of stimulus dimensions in perceptual information processing” in Perception Cognition and Development: Interactional Analysis Eds TigheT JSheppB E (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 1–38
15.
GarnerW RFelfoldyG L, 1970“Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing”Cognitive Psychology1225–241
16.
GottwaldR LGarnerW R, 1972“Effects of focusing strategy on speeded classification with grouping, filtering and condensation tasks”Perception & Psychophysics11179–182
17.
GottwaldR LGarnerW R, 1975“Filtering and condensation tasks with integral and separable dimensions”Perception & Psychophysics18435–437
18.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1959“Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex”Journal of Physiology (London)148574–591
19.
HubelD HWieselT N, 1962“Receptive fields, binocular interactions and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex”Journal of Physiology (London)160105–154
20.
HymanR, 1953“Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time”Journal of Experimental Psychology45188–196
21.
JonesJ PPalmerL A, 1987“The two dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex”Journal of Neurophysiology581187–1211
22.
KolersP A, 1972Aspects of Motion Perception (New York: Pergamon Press)
23.
LockheadG R, 1966“Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination”Journal of Experimental Psychology7295–104
24.
LockheadG R, 1970“Identification and the form of multidimensional discrimination space”Journal of Experimental Psychology851–10
25.
LockheadG R, 1972“Processing dimensional stimuli: A note”Psychological Review79410–419
26.
MaffeiLFiorentiniA, 1973“The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyzer”Vision Research131255–1267
27.
MonahanJ SLockheadG R, 1977“Identification of integral stimuli”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General10496–110
28.
PalmerL ADavisT P, 1981“Receptive field structures in cat striate cortex”Journal of Neurophysiology46260–276
29.
PollenD ARonnerS F, 1975“Periodic changes across the receptive fields of complex cells in the striate and parastriate cortex of the cat”Journal of Physiology (London)245667–697
30.
ShapleyRRossettoM, 1976“An electronic visual stimulator”Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation815–20
31.
ShepardR N, 1964“Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space”Journal of Mathematical Psychology154–87
32.
SpitzerHHochsteinS, 1985a“Simple and complex-cell response dependences on stimulation parameters”Journal of Neurophysiology531244–1265
33.
SpitzerHHochsteinS, 1985b“A complex-cell receptive-field model”Journal of Neurophysiology531281–1301
34.
WoodC C, 1974“Parallel processing of auditory and phonetic information in speech discrimination”Perception & Psychophysics15501–508
35.
WoodC C, 1975“Auditory and phonetic levels of processing in speed perception: neurophysiological and information-processing analyses”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13–20
