Paleolithic representational art has a number of consistent characteristics: the subjects are almost always animals, depicted without scenic background, usually in profile, and mostly in outline; the means of representation are extremely economical, often consisting of only a few strokes that indicate the salient features of the animal which are sufficient to suggest the whole form; and it is naturalistic to a degree, but lacks anything like photographic realism. Two elementary questions are raised in this essay: (i) why did the earliest known attempts at depiction have just these characteristics and not others? and (ii) how are objects so minimally represented recognizable? The answers seem to lie with certain fundamental features of visual perception, especially figure—ground distinction, Gestalt principles of closure and good continuation, line surrogacy, component feature analysis, and canonical imaging. In the earliest pictures the graphic means used are such that they evoke the same visual responses as those involved in the perception of real-world forms, but eschew redundancies of color, texture, linear perspective, and completeness of representation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnheimR, 1969Visual Thinking (Berkeley: University of California Press)
2.
BahnP GVertutJ, 1988Images of the Ice Age (New York: Facts on File)
3.
BiedermanI, 1987“Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding”Psychological Review94115–147
4.
BiedermanIJuG, 1988“Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition”Cognitive Psychology2038–64
5.
BreuilH, 1952/1979Four Centuries of Cave Art; English translation by BoyleM E (New York: Hacker Art Books, 1979) of Quatre Cent Siecles d'Art Pariétal (Montignac: Centre d'Études et de Documentation Préhistoriques, 1952)
6.
CabeP A, 1980“Picture perception in nonhuman subjects” in The Perception of Picturesvolume 2, Ed. HagenM A (New York: Academic Press) pp 305–343
7.
DavisA M, 1985“The canonical bias: Young children's drawings of familiar objects” in Visual Order Eds FreemanN HCoxM V (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 202–213
8.
DeregowskiJ B, 1976“On seeing a picture for the first time”Leonardo919–23
9.
DeregowskiJ B, 1980Illusions, Patterns, and Pictures (London: Academic Press)
10.
DeregowskiJ B, 1989“Real space and represented space: Cross-cultural perspectives”Behavioral and Brain Sciences1251–119
11.
DeregowskiJ B, 1990“On two distinct and quintessential kinds of pictorial representation” in Ecological Perception Research, Visual Communication, and Aesthetics Ed. LandwehrK (Berlin: Springer) pp 29–42
12.
DeregowskiJ BMuldrowE SMuldrowW F, 1972“Pictorial recognition in a remote Ethiopian population”Perception1417–425
13.
DodwellP C, 1975“Pattern and object perception” in Handbook of Perceptionvolume 5, Eds CarteretteE CFriedmanM P (New York: Academic Press) pp 261–299
14.
ForgeA, 1970“Learning to see in New Guinea” in Socialization: The Approach from Social Anthropology Ed. MayerP (New York: Tavistock) pp 269–291
15.
FreemanL G, 1987Altamira Revisited (Chicago/Santander: Institute for Prehistoric Investigations)
16.
FreemanN HJanikounR, 1972“Intellectual realism in children's drawings of a familiar object with distinctive features”Child Development431116–1121
17.
García GuineaM A, 1979Altamira and Other Cantabrian Caves translated by PolakN (Madrid: Silex)
18.
GibsonJ J, 1951“What is a form?”Psychological Review58403–412
19.
GombrichE H, 1961Art and Illusion (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
20.
GoodmanN, 1968The Languages of Art (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill)
21.
GreenR TCourtisM C, 1966“Information theory and figure perception: The metaphor that failed”Acta Psychologica2512–36
22.
GregoryR J, 1974“Choosing a paradigm for perception” in Handbook of Perceptionvolume 1, Eds CarteretteE CFriedmanM P (London: Academic Press) pp 255–283
23.
HaberR NHershensonM, 1980The Psychology of Visual Perception (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston)
24.
HagenM A, 1986Varieties of Realism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
25.
HochbergJ, 1972“The representation of things and people” in Art, Perception and Reality Eds GombrichE HHochbergJBlackM (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press) pp 47–94
26.
HochbergA, 1978“Art and perception” in Handbook of Perceptionvolume 10, Eds CarteretteE CFriedmanM P (London: Academic Press) pp 225–258
27.
HochbergJBrooksV, 1962“Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: A study of one child's performance”American Journal of Psychology75624–628
28.
HudsonW, 1960“Pictorial depth perception in subcultural groups in Africa”Journal of Social Psychology52183–208
29.
KennedyJ M, 1971“Incomplete pictures and detection of features”Journal of Structural Learning171–73
30.
KennedyJ M, 1914a“Is gradual recognition of pictures by Ethiopian subjects a differentiation process or a pattern construction process?”Perception329–31
31.
KennedyJ M, 1974bA Psychology of Picture Perception (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass)
32.
KennedyJ M, 1974c“Perception, pictures, and the etcetera principle” in Perception Eds MacLeodR BPickH LJr (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press) pp 209–226
33.
KennedyJ MRossA S, 1975“Outline picture perception by the Songe of Papua”Perception4391–406
34.
KennedyJ MSilverJ, 1974“The surrogate functions of lines in visual perception: Evidence from antipodal rock and cave artwork sources”Perception3313–322
35.
LorblanchetM, 1977“From naturalism to abstraction in European prehistoric rock art” in Form in Indigenous Art Ed UckoP J (London: Gerald Duckworth) pp 44–56
36.
Leroi-GourhanA, 1967Treasures of Prehistoric Art translated by GutermanN (New York: Harry N Abrams)
37.
Leroi-GourhanA, 1982The Dawn of European Art translated by ChampionS (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
38.
Mundy-CastleA C, 1966“Pictorial depth perception in Ghanaian children”International Journal of Psychology1289–300
39.
PalmerSRoschEChaseP, 1981“Canonical perspective and the perception of objects” in Attention and PerformanceVolume IX, Eds LongJBaddeleyA (Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum) pp 135–151
40.
RockI, 1984Perception (New York: Scientific American Library)
41.
SandarsN K, 1985Prehistoric Art in Europe (Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books)
42.
SchierF, 1986Deeper into Pictures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
43.
SegallM HCampbellD THerskovitsM J, 1966The Influence of Culture on Visual Perception (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill)
44.
SerpellRDeregowskiJ B, 1980“The skill of pictorial perception: An intepretation of cross-cultural evidence”International Journal of Psychology15145–180
45.
TverskyA, 1977“Features of similarity”Psychology Review84327–350
46.
UckoP JRosenfeldA, 1967Paleolithic Cave Art (New York: McGraw-Hill)
47.
ZusneL, 1970Visual Perception of Form (New York: Academic Press)
