The threshold of sensitivity to movement could be governed by mechanisms that are sensitive either to change in spatial position, or directly to the movement itself. The use of spatially complex patterns (random-dot patterns) has been suggested to eliminate the former strategy allowing examination of the movement detecting mechanisms in isolation. By means of such a technique, thresholds for directional judgements were determined for patterns which underwent either a simple displacement or a shearing displacement. Thresholds for shearing motion were found to be around one half of those for simple motion, suggesting that relative, rather than absolute, motion governs performance for small displacements. This contrasts with previous experiments which showed that absolute motion governs performance for much larger displacements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllmanJMiezinFMcGuinnesE, 1985“Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field”Annual Review of Neuroscience8407–430
2.
AubertH, 1886“Die Bewegungsempfindung”Archives of Gestalt Physiology39347–370
3.
BakerC LBraddickO J, 1982“Does segregation of differently moving areas depend upon relative or absolute motion?”Vision Research22851–856
4.
BenderD BDavidsonR M, 1986“Global visual processing in the monkey superior colliculus”Brain Research381372–375
5.
BonnetC, 1982“Thresholds of visual motion” in Tutorials on Motion Perception Eds WertheimA HWagenaarW ALeibowitzH W (New York: Plenum Press) pp 41–78
6.
BraddickO J, 1974“A short-range process in apparent motion”Vision Research14519–527
7.
BuckinghamTWatkinsRBinningtonJ, 1991“The effect of spatial parameters on oscillatory movement displacement thresholds”Vision Research31327–331
8.
BurnsB DGassanovVWebbA C, 1972“Responses of neurons in the cat cerebral cortex to relative movement patterns”Journal of Physiology (London)226133–151
9.
CohenR LBonnetC, 1972“Movement detection thresholds and stimulus durations”Perception & Psychophysics12269–272
10.
DimmickF LKarlJ C, 1930“The effect of exposure time upon the R. L. of visual motion”Journal of Experimental Psychology13365–369
11.
ExnerS T, 1875“Über das Sehen von Bewegungen und die Theorie des zusammengesetzten Auges”Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaft in Wien72156–190
12.
FinneyD J, 1971Probit Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
13.
FrostB J, 1985“Neural mechanisms for detecting object motion and figure—ground boundaries, contrasted with self-motion detecting systems” in Brain Mechanisms and Spatial Vision Eds IngleD JJeannerodMLeeD N (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff) pp 415–449
14.
FrostB JCavanaghPMorganB, 1988“Deep tectal cells in pigeons respond to kinematograms”Journal of Comparative Physiology A162639–647
HendersonD C, 1971“The relationship among time, distance and intensity as determinants of motion discrimination”Perception & Psychophysics10313–320
17.
JohnsonC ALeibowitzH W, 1976“Velocity-time reciprocity in the perception of motion: foveal and peripheral determinations”Vision Research1677–80
18.
JohnsonC AScobeyR P, 1982“Effects of reference lines on displacement thresholds at various durations of movement”Vision Research22819–821
19.
LeggeG ECampbellF W, 1981“Displacement detection in human vision”Vision Research21205–214
20.
LeibowitzH W, 1955“Effect of reference lines on the discrimination of movement”Journal of the Optical Society of America45829–830
21.
MandlG, 1985“Responses of visual cells in cat superior colliculus to relative pattern movement”Vision Research25267–281
22.
MatesB, 1969“Effects of reference marks and luminance on discrimination of movement”Journal of Psychology73209–221
23.
NakayamaKTylerC W, 1981“Psychological isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues”Vision Research21427–433
24.
RichardsWLeibermanH R, 1982“Velocity blindness during shearing motion”Vision Research2297–100
25.
RogersBGrahamM, 1979“Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception”Perception8125–134
26.
OrbanG AGulyásBSpileersW, 1987“A moving noise background modulates responses to moving bars of monkey V2 cells but not monkey V1 cells”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual ScienceSupplement 28197
ShioiriSOnoHSatoT, 1991“Adaptation of relative motion detectors”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual ScienceSupplement 32827
29.
SiegelR MAndersenR A, 1986“Motion deficits following ibotenic acid lesions of the middle temporal area (MT) in the behaving rhesus monkey”Society for Neuroscience Abstracts121183
30.
SnowdenR JBraddickO J, 1989“The combination of motion signals over time”Vision Research291621–1630
31.
SnowdenR JBraddickO J, 1990“Differences in the processing of short-range apparent motion at small and large displacements”Vision Research301211–1222
32.
TanakaHHikosakaKSaitoH-AYukieMFukadaYIwaiE, 1986“Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey”Journal of Neuroscience6134–144
33.
TylerC W, 1973“Periodic vernier acuity”Journal of Physiology (London)288637–647
34.
TylerC WTorresJ, 1972“Frequency response characteristics for sinusoidal movement in the fovea and periphery”Perception & Psychophysics12232–236
35.
ZekiS M, 1980“The response of cells in the middle temporal area (MT) of the owl monkey visual cortex”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B277239–248
