In past research evidence has been found for both mental imagery and propositional hierarchies in subjects' map representations. How the visual and semantic factors associated with maps influence the use of one form of representation or another was the subject of the study reported here. Subjects were required to make relational judgments about city pairs. The results of experiment 1 indicated that superordinate relationships (the relationship of the counties of which the cities were members) affected only the most difficult perceptual judgments, but affected all judgments made from memory. Experiment 2 was done to determine the extent to which these findings were attributable to perceptual distortions rather than propositionally stored rules. Results of experiment 3 showed the degree of perceptual distinction necessary for propositional rules to have no significant influence on relational judgments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlgomDGoshenE, 1994“Remembered and perceived size as a function of familiarity”Perceptual and Motor Skills781035–1040
2.
AlgomDLubelS, 1994“Psychophysics in the field: Perception and memory for labor pain”Perception & Psychophysics55133–141
3.
AretzA JWickensC D, 1992“The mental rotation of map displays”Human Performance5303–328
4.
ChaseW G, 1986“Visual information processing”, in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance Eds BoffK RKaufmanLThomasJ P, (New York: John Wiley) pp 1–71
5.
ClaytonKHabibiA, 1991“Contribution of temporal contiguity to the spatial priming effect”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition17263–271
6.
EvansG APezdekK, 1980“Cognitive mapping: Knowledge of real-world distance and location information”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory613–24
7.
GarlingTBookALindbergE, 1985“Adults' memory representations of the spatial properties of their everyday physical environment”, in The Development of Spatial Cognition Ed. CohenR, (Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 141–184
8.
HuttenlocherJHedgesL VDunanS, 1991“Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location”Psychological Review98352–376
9.
KempS, 1988“Memorial psychophysics for visual area: The effect of retention interval”Memory and Cognition16431–436
10.
KerstS MHowardJ H, 1978“Memory psychophysics for visual area and length”Memory and Cognition6327–335
11.
KosslynS M, 1981“The medium and the message in mental imagery: A theory”Psychological Review8846–66
12.
KosslynS MBallT MReiserB J, 1978“Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance447–60
13.
KulhavyR WSchwartzN HShahaS H, 1983“Spatial representation of maps”American Journal of Psychology96337–351
14.
LevineMJankovicIPalijM, 1982“Principles of spatial problem solving”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General111157–175
15.
McGuinnessC, 1992“Spatial models in the mind”The Irish Journal of Psychology13524–535
16.
McNamaraT P, 1986“Mental representations of spatial relations”Cognitive Psychology1887–121
17.
McNamaraT PHalpinJ AHardyJ K, 1992“Spatial and temporal contributions to the structure of spatial memory”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18555–564
18.
McNamaraT PHardyJ KHirtleS C, 1989“Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition15211–227
19.
OsakaN, 1987“Memory psychophysics for pyridine smell scale”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society2556–57
20.
PressonC CHazelriggM D, 1984“Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition10716–722
21.
RossanoM JWarrenD H, 1989“Misaligned maps lead to predictable errors”Perception18805–816
22.
ShepardRHurwitzS, 1984“Upward direction, mental rotation, and the discrimination of left and right turns in maps”Cognition18161–193
23.
SnodgrassL L, 1990“The importance of mental imagery in map reading” in Mental Imagery Ed. KunzendorfR G, (New York: Plenum) pp 17–22
24.
StevensACoupeP, 1978“Distortions in judged spatial relations”Cognitive Psychology10422–437
25.
TaylorH ATverskyB, 1992“Descriptions and depictions of environments”Memory and Cognition20483–496
26.
ThorndykeP W, 1981“Distance estimation from cognitive maps”Cognitive Psychology13526–550
27.
TverskyB, 1981“Distortions in memory for maps”Cognitive Psychology13407–433
28.
WiestW MBellB, 1985“Stevens's exponent for psychophysical scaling of perceived, remembered, and inferred distance”Psychological Bulletin98457–470
