Triangle completion (ie homing to the starting point after completing two legs of a triangle) is a widely used method for examining path-integration abilities in animals and humans. Two experiments are reported in which homing was used to examine the efficiency of purely visual mechanisms (eg optical flow) for spatial-information coding and integration. Adult observers had to complete triangles in an interactively simulated three-dimensional environment which consisted of two critical objects and a homogeneous set of white cylinders serving as background. Each participant completed twenty-seven triangles corresponding to a factorial combination of three geometrical fields of view (40°, 60°, or 80°) and nine triangle layouts (with variations of the first turning angle and the second leg). Homing performances revealed strong effects of triangle layout, but no effect of geometrical fields of view: variations in the amount of simultaneous visible spatial information did not influence the acquisition of spatial knowledge in the environments used. Applying the encoding-error model to the data revealed severe systematic errors of picking up directional information while moving through visually simulated environments. These results are discussed with respect to informational differences between situations of purely visual and nonvisual navigations in space.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlfanoP LMichelG F, 1990“Restricting the field of view: Perceptual and performance effects”Perceptual and Motor Skills7035–45
2.
ArthurE JHancockP AChryslerS T, 1997“The perception of spatial layout in real and virtual worlds”Ergonomics4069–77
3.
BatscheletE, 1981Circular Statistics in Biology. Mathematics in Biology (London: Academic Press)
4.
BengstonJ KStergiosJ CWardJ LJesterR E, 1980“Optic array determinants of apparent distance and size in pictures”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance4751–759
5.
BerthozAIsraëlIGeorges-FrancoisPGrassoRTsuzukuT, 1995, “Spatial memory of body linear displacement: What is being stored?”Science26995–98
6.
BurdeaGCoiffetP, 1994Virtual Reality Technology (New York: John Wiley)
7.
CuttingJ E, 1986Perception with an Eye for Motion (Boston, MA: MIT Press)
8.
DurlachN IMavorA S, (Eds), 1995Virtual Reality: Scientific and Technological Challenges (Washington, DC: National Academy Press)
9.
EllisS R, 1991Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments (London: Taylor and Francis)
10.
FujitaNKlatzkyR LLoomisJ MGolledgeR G, 1993“The encoding-error model of pathway completion without vision”Geographical Analysis25295–314
11.
GallistelC R, 1990The Organization of Learning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
12.
GibsonJ J, 1966The Senses Considered as a Perceptual System (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin)
GrunwaldA JEllisS RSmithS, 1988“Mathematical model for spatial orientation from pictorial perspective displays”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics18425–437
15.
HenryDFurnessT A, 1993“Spatial perception in virtual environments: Evaluating an architectural application”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS) (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press) pp 33–40
16.
JohanssonGBörjessonE, 1989“Toward a new theory of vision studies in wide-angle space perception”Ecological Psychology1301–331
17.
KalawskyR S, 1993The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments (Reading MA: Addison-Wesley)
18.
KlatzkyR LLoomisJ MGolledgeR G, 1997“Encoding spatial representations through nonvisually guided locomotion: Tests of human path integration”, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Ed. MedinD, (San Diego, CA: Academic Press) pp 41–84
19.
KlatzkyR LLoomisJ MGolledgeR GCicinelliJ GDohertySPellegrinoJ W, 1990“Acquisition of route and survey knowledge in the absence of vision”Journal of Motor Behavior2219–43
20.
LandauBSpelkeEGleitmanH, 1984“Spatial knowledge in a young blind child”Cognition16225–260
21.
LoomisJ MKlatzkyR LGolledgeR GCicinelliJ GPellegrinoJ WFryP A, 1993“Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General12273–91
22.
McGreevyM WEllisS R, 1986“The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments”Human Factors25439–456
23.
MaurerRSéguinotV, 1995“What is modelling for? A critical review of the models of path integration”Journal of Theoretical Biology175457–475
24.
MayM, 1996“Cognitive and embodied modes of spatial imagery”Psychologische Beiträge38418–434
25.
MayMPéruchPSavoyantA, 1995“Navigating in a virtual environment with map-acquired knowledge: Encoding and alignment effects”Ecological Psychology721–36
26.
MittelstaedtHMittelstaedtM L, 1982“Homing by path integration”, in Avian Navigation Eds PapiFWallraffH G, (New York: Springer) pp 290–297
27.
NealeD C, 1996“Spatial perception in desktop virtually environments”, in Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society) pp 1117–1121
28.
NemireKJacobyR HEllisS R, 1994“Simulation fidelity of a virtual environment display”Human Factors3679–93
29.
PaillardJ, 1991“Motor and representational framing of space”, in Brain and Space Ed. PaillardJ, (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 163–182
30.
PéruchPBorelLGaunetFThinus-BlancCMagnanJLacourM, (submitted) “Spatial performance of unilateral vestibular defective patients in nonvisual versus visual navigation”
31.
PéruchPVercherJ LGauthierG M, 1995“Acquisition of spatial knowledge through visual exploration of simulated environments”Ecological Psychology71–20
32.
PsotkaJLewisS AKingD, (in press) “Effects of field of view on judgments of self-location: Distortions in distance estimations even when image geometry exactly fits the field of view”Presence.
33.
RegianJ WShebilskeWMonkJ, 1992“A preliminary empirical evaluation of virtual reality as an instructional medium for visual-spatial tasks”Journal of Communication42136–149
34.
RieserJ J, 1990“Development of perceptual-motor control while walking without vision: The calibration of perception and action”, in Sensory-motor Organizations and Development in Infancy and Early Childhood Eds BlochHBertenthalB I, (Dordrecht: Kluwer) pp 379–408
35.
RieserJ JGaringA E, 1994“Spatial orientation”Encyclopedia of Human Behavior14287–295
36.
RieserJ JHillE WTalorC RRosenSBradfieldA, 1992“Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighborhoods explored by walking”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General121210–221
37.
RieserJ JPickH LJrAshmeadD HGaringA E, 1995“The calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21480–497
38.
SedgwickH A, 1991“The effects of viewpoint on the virtual space of pictures”, in Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments Ed. EllisS R, (London: Taylor and Francis) pp 460–479
39.
StrelowE R, 1985“What is needed for a theory of mobility: Direct perception and cognitive maps—Lessons from the blind”Psychological Review92226–248
40.
TlaukaMWilsonP N, 1994“The effect of landmarks on route learning in a computer-simulated environment”Journal of Environmental Psychology14305–313
41.
VishtonP MCuttingJ E, 1995“Wayfinding, displacements, and mental maps: Velocity fields are not typically used to determine one's aimpoint”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21978–995
42.
WarrenRWertheimA H, (Eds), 1990Perception and Control of Self-motion (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
43.
WorchelP, 1951“Space perception and orientation in the blind”Psychological Monographs651–28
44.
YamamotoT, 1991“A longitudinal study of the development of spatial problem solving ability in the early blind”Japanese Journal of Psychology61413–417
