The problem of spatial scale in depth perception can be considered at three stages: image input, mechanisms, and depth descriptors specific for certain tasks. A review is presented of a number of earlier experiments supporting the distinction between a coarse, correlation-based mechanism and a feature-matching mechanism of stereopsis in terms of their respective inputs and outputs. In order to measure the influence of the correlation mechanism on the perception of three-dimensional shape, a shape-probe experiment was designed. For smooth intensity profiles with constant disparity, the results show that perceived shape is largely independent of overall disparity but does make use of shape from shading as well as the assumption that brighter parts are in front (proximity–luminance covariance).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonB LNakayamaK, 1994“Toward a general theory of stereopsis: Binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion”Psychological Review101414–445.
2.
ArndtP AMallotH ABülthoffH H, 1995“Human stereovision without localized image-features”Biological Cybernetics72279–293.
3.
BülthoffH HMallotH A, 1988“Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading”Journal of the Optical Society of America A51749–1758.
4.
ChristouC GParkerA J, 1993“An investigation of intensity-based stereo in human shape judgments”Perception22, supplement, 106.
5.
CormackL KStevensonS BSchorC M, 1991“Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing”Vision Research312195–2207.
6.
De ValoisR LDe ValoisK K, 1988Spatial Vision (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
7.
DosherB ASperlingGWurstS A, 1986“Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure”Vision Research26973–990.
8.
FleetD JLangleyK, 1994“Non-Fourier channels in stereopsis and motion”Perception23, supplement, 83.
HarmonL DJuleszB, 1973“Effects of two-dimensional filtered noise”Science1801194–1197.
11.
HarrisJ MMcKeeS PSmallmanH S, 1997“Fine-scale processing of human binocular stereopsis”Journal of the Optical Society of America A141673–1683.
12.
HowardI PRogersB J, 1995Binocular Vision and Stereopsis (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
13.
IkeuchiKHornB K P, 1981“Numerical shape from shading and occluding boundaries”Artificial Intelligence17141–184.
14.
JuleszB, 1971Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press).
15.
JuleszB, 1988“In the last minutes of evolution of life, stereoscopic depth perception captured the input layer to the visual cortex to break camouflage”Perception17A3.
16.
LeggeG EGuY, 1989“Stereopsis and contrast”Vision Research29989–1004.
17.
MallotH AArndtP ABülthoffH H, 1996a“A psychophysical and computational analysis of intensity-based stereo”Biological Cybernetics75187–198.
18.
MallotH AGillnerSArndtP A, 1996b“Is correspondence search in human stereo vision a coarse-to-fine process?”Biological Cybernetics7495–106.
19.
MallotH ARollAArndtP A, 1996c“Disparity-evoked vergence is driven by interocular correlation”Vision Research362925–2937.
20.
MarrDPoggioT, 1976“Cooperative computation of stereo disparity”Science194283–287.
21.
MarrDPoggioT, 1979“A computational theory of human stereo vision”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B204301–328.
22.
MayhewJ E WFrisbyJ P, 1981“Psychophysical and computational studies towards a theory of human stereopsis”Artificial Intelligence17349–385.
23.
MowforthPMayhewJ E WFrisbyJ P, 1981“Vergence eye movements made in response to spatial-frequency-filtered random-dot stereograms”Perception10299–304.
24.
OgleK N, 1964Researches in Binocular Vision (New York: Hafner Press).
25.
PomerantzJ RKubovyM, 1986“Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization, simplicity and likelihood principles”, in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance volume 2 Cognitive Processes and Performance Eds BoffK RKaufmannLThomasJ P, (New York: John Wiley) Chapter 36.
26.
QuickR F, 1974“A vector-magnitude model for contrast detection”Kybernetik1665–67.
27.
SchynsP GOlivaA, 1997“Flexible, diagnocity-driven, rather than fixed, perceptually determined scale selection in scene and face recognition”Perception261011–1012.
28.
SmallmanH S, 1995“Fine-to-coarse scale disambiguation in stereopsis”Vision Research351047–1060.
29.
SnippeH P, 1996“Parameter extraction from population codes: A critical assessment”Neural Computation8511–529.
30.
SperlingG, 1970“Binocular vision: A physical and a neural theory”American Journal of Psychology83461–534.
31.
StevensonS BCormackL KSchorC M, 1994“The effect of stimulus contrast and interocular correlation on disparity vergence”Vision Research34383–396.
32.
TheimerWMallotH A, 1994“Phase-based vergence control and depth reconstruction using active vision”Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing: Image Understanding60343–358.
33.
TylerC W, 1990“A stereoscopic view of visual processing streams”Vision Research301877–1895.
34.
de VriesS CKappersA M LKoenderinkJ J, 1993“Shape from stereo: A systematic approach using quadratic surfaces”Perception & Psychophysics5371–80.
35.
WattR J, 1987“Scanning from coarse to fine spatial scales in the human visual system after the onset of a stimulus”Journal of the Optical Society of America A42006–2021.
36.
WeinshallD, 1991“Seeing ‘ghost’ planes in stereo vision”Vision Research311731–1748.
37.
WilsonH RMcFarlaneD KPhillipsG C, 1983“Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking”Vision Research23873–882.
