As reported by Neumann and Klotz [1994, in Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing Eds C Umiltà, M Moscovitch (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 123–150], a geometric shape masked by metacontrast can affect response latency (RT) even if it is not visible, ie if it yields a d' value of zero in a signal-detection (SD) task (metacontrast dissociation). In the initial study as well as in most subsequent experiments, the RT task was manual and the SD task was verbal. Hence tasks and output modes were confounded. In the present study, two experiments were conducted to find out which of these factors is responsible for the metacontrast dissociation. In experiment 1, participants performed an RT task in either a manual or a verbal output mode. In experiment 2, these output modes were compared in an SD task. Independently of output modes, the masked primes affected RT but could not be detected in the SD task. It is concluded that tasks, but not output modes, are crucial for the metacontrast dissociation. Implications for the mechanisms underlying the metacontrast dissociation and for the functional difference between judgments and responses are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenR A, 1995“Coordinate transformations and motor planning in posterior parietal cortex”, in The Cognitive Neurosciences Ed. GazzanigaM S, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 519–532
2.
AscherslebenGMüsselerJ, (submitted) “Dissociations in the timing of stationary and moving stimuli”
3.
BreitmeyerB G, 1984Visual Masking: An Integrative Approach (New York: Oxford University Press)
4.
BridgemanBKirchMSperlingA, 1981“Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion”Perception & Psychophysics29336–342
5.
BridgemanBLewisSHeitGNagleM, 1979“Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance5692–700
6.
BridgemanBPeerySAnandS, 1997“Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space”Perception & Psychophysics59456–469
7.
CastieloUPaulignanYJeannerodM, 1991“Temporal dissociation of motor responses and subjective awareness”Brain1142639–2655
EimerMSchlagheckenF, (in press) “Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10.
FehrerERaabD, 1962“Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast”Journal of Experimental Psychology62143–147
11.
FraisseP, 1969“Information and reaction time for ‘naming’ responses”Journal of Experimental Psychology70309–314
12.
GoodaleM AMilnerA D, 1992“Separate visual pathways for perception and action”Trends in Neurosciences1520–25
13.
GoodaleM AMilnerA DJakobsonL SCareyD P, 1991“A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them”Nature (London)349154–156
14.
GreenD MSwetsJ A, 1966Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (New York: John Wiley)
15.
JaskowskiP, 1996“Simple reaction-time and perception of temporal order—dissociations and hypotheses”Perceptual and Motor Skills82707–730
16.
KahnemanD, 1968“Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking”Psychological Bulletin70404–425
17.
KentridgeR WHeywoodC AWeiskrantzL, 1997“Residual vision in multiple retinal locations within a scotoma: Implications for blindsight”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience9191–202
18.
KibeleAKlotzWNeumannO, (submitted) “Motor responses to completely masked stimuli: A comparison of three modes of responding”
19.
KlotzWNeumannO, (in press) “Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
20.
KlotzWWolffP, 1995“The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus”Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung5892–101
21.
LeutholdHKoppB, 1998“Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials”Psychological Science9263–269
22.
MarcelA J, 1993“Slippage in the unity of consciousness”, in Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Consciousness Eds BockG RMarshJ, (Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley) pp 168–186
23.
MillerJRiehleARequinJ, 1992“Effects of preliminary perceptual output on neuronal activity of the primary motor cortex”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance181121–1138
24.
MilnerA DGoodaleM A, 1993“Visual pathways to perception and action”Progress in Brain Research95317–337
25.
MilnerA DGoodaleM A, 1995The Visual Brain in Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
26.
MorinR EKonickATroxlerNMcPhersonS, 1965“Why is naming longer than reading?”Acta Psychologica3096–103
27.
NeumannO, 1982Experimente zum Fehrer - Raab-Effekt und das ‘Wetterwart’-Modell der visuellen Maskierung report 24, Ruhr-University Bochum, Cognitive Psychology Unit, Bochum, Germany
28.
NeumannO, 1989“Kognitive Vermittlung und direkte Parameter Spezifikation. Zum Problem mentaler Repräsentation in der Wahrnehmung”Sprache und Kognition832–49
29.
NeumannO, 1990“Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception”Psychological Research52207–215
30.
NeumannOAnsorgeUKlotzW, 1998“Funktionsdifferenzierung im visuellen Kortex: Grundlage für motorische Aktivierung durch nicht bewußt wahrgenommene Reize?”Psychologische Rundschau49185–196
31.
NeumannOEsselmannUKlotzW, 1993“Differential effects of visual-spatial attention on response latency and temporal order judgment”Psychological Research5626–34
32.
NeumannOKlotzW, 1994“Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification?”, in Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing Eds UmiltàCMoscovitchM, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 123–150
33.
NeumannOKochRNiepelMTappeT, 1992“Reaktionszeit und zeitliches Reihenfolgeurteil: Übereinstimmung oder Dissoziation?”Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie39621–645
34.
NeumannOMüsselerJ, 199046‘Judgment’ vs ‘response’: A general problem and some experimental illustrations”, in Psychophysical Explorations of Mental Structures Eds GeißlerH-GMüllerM HPrinzW, (Göttingen: Hogrefe) pp 445–455
35.
NeumannOPrinzW, 1987“Kognitive Antezedenzien von Willkürhandlungen” (Cognitive antecedents of voluntary actions), in Jenseits des Rubikon: Der Wille in den Humanwissenschaften Eds HeckhausenHGollwitzerP MWeinertF E, (Berlin: Springer) pp 195–215
36.
PrinzW, 1990“A common coding approach to perception and action”, in Relationships between Perception and Action Eds NeumannOPrinzW, (New York: Springer) pp 167–201
37.
RizzolattiGRiggioLSheligaB M, 1994“Space and selective attention”, in Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing Eds UmiltàCMoscovitchM, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 231–265
38.
SchillerP HSmithM C, 1966“Detection in metacontrast”Journal of Experimental Psychology7132–39
39.
SchlagheckenFEimerM, 1997“The influence of subliminally presented primes on response preparation”Sprache und Kognition16166–175
40.
SmidH G O MMulderGMulderL J M, 1990“Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow”Acta Psychologica74169–201
41.
StiglerR, 1910“Chronophotische Studien über den Umgebungskontrast”Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie134365–435
42.
VorbergD, 1998“Reaktionen auf unbewußte visuelle Reize: Umkehr von Bahnung in Hemmung”, paper presented at the 40th Congress of Experimental Psychology, Marburg, 6–9 April 1998
43.
WeissteinN, 1972“Metacontrast”, in Handbook of Sensory Physiology volume 7/4 Visual Psychophysics Eds JamesonDHurvichL M, (New York: Springer) pp 233–272
44.
WernerH, 1935“Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analyses”American Journal of Psychology4740–64
45.
WolffP, 1989“Einfluß des maskierten Testreizes auf die Wahlreaktion auf den Metakontrast”, paper presented at the 31st Congress of Experimental Psychology, Bamberg, 20–23 March 1989
46.
WolffP, 1997“Einfluß der Alternativenzahl auf den Kongruenz-Inkongruenz – Effekt”, paper presented at the conference “Motorische Effekte nicht bewußt repräsentierter Reize”, Bielefeld, 5–6 December 1997
