Recent physiological studies have established that cortical cells that are tuned for the direction of motion may also exhibit tuning for binocular disparity. This tuning does not appear to provide any advantage in discriminating the direction of global motion in random-dot kinematograms. Here we investigated the possibility that this tuning may be important in the perception of transparent motion. Random-dot kinematograms were presented which contained coherent motion in a single direction or in two opposing directions. A greater proportion of signal dots was required for the detection of transparent motion than of motion in a single direction. This difference vanished when the two opposite directions of motion were presented with different disparities. These results suggest that the direction of global motion can be computed separately for surfaces which are clearly segregated in depth.
LindseyD TToddJ T, 1995“Detection of motion in transparent motion displays”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science36(4) S1048
17.
McKeeS PWatamaniukS N JHarrisJ MSmallmanH STaylorD G, 1997“Is stereopsis effective in breaking camouflage for moving targets?”Vision Research372047–2055
18.
MatherGMouldenB, 1983“Thresholds for movement direction: two directions are less detectable than one”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology35513–518
19.
MaunsellJ H RVan EssenD C, 1983“Functional properties of neurons in the middle temporal area of the macaque monkey, II: Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity”Journal of Neurophysiology491148–1167
20.
MovshonJ AAdelsonE AGizziMNewsomeW T, 1985“The analysis of moving visual patterns”, in Study Group on Pattern Recognition Mechanisms Eds ChagisCGattassRGrossC G(Vatican City: Pontifica Academia Scientiarum) pp 117–151
21.
NawrotMBlakeR, 1991“The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion”Perception & Psychophysics49230–244
22.
NewsomeW TParéE B, 1988“A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT)”Journal of Neuroscience82201–2211
23.
PoggioG FTalbotW H, 1981“Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey”Journal of Physiology (London)315469–492
24.
QianNAndersenR A, 1994“Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology”Journal of Neuroscience147367–7380
25.
QianNAndersenR AAdelsonE H, 1994“Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics”Journal of Neuroscience147357–7366
26.
RodmanH RAlbrightT D, 1989“Single-unit analysis of pattern motion selective properties in the middle temporal visual area (MT)”Experimental Brain Research7553–64
27.
RogersB JGrahamM E, 1984“Aftereffects from motion parallax and stereoscopic depth: similarities and interactions”, in Sensory Experience, Adaptation and Perception: Festschrift Ivo Kohler Eds SpillmannLWootenB R(Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 603–619
28.
RoyJ PKomatsuHWurtzR H, 1992“Disparity sensitivity of neurons in monkey extrastriate area MST”Journal of Neuroscience122478–2492
29.
ScaseM OBraddickO JRaymondJ E, 1996“What is noise for the motion system?”Vision Research362579–2586
30.
SnowdenR J, 1989“Motions in orthogonal directions are mutually suppressive”Journal of the Optical Society of America A71096–1101
31.
SnowdenR JRossiterM C, 1999“Stereoscopic depth cues can segment motion information”Perception28193–201
32.
SnowdenR JTreueSEricksonR GAndersenR A, 1991“The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion noise”Journal of Neuroscience112768–2785
33.
TreueSMaunsellJ H R, 1996“Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST”Nature (London)382539–541
34.
VerstratenF A JVerlindeRFredricksenR Evan de GrindW A, 1994“A transparent motion aftereffect contingent on binocular disparity”Perception231181–1188
