Psychophysical and neurophysiological studies suggest that human body motions can be readily recognized. Human bodies are highly articulated and can move in a nonrigid manner. As a result, we perceive highly dissimilar views of the human form in motion. How does the visual system integrate multiple views of a human body in motion so that we can perceive human movement as a continuous event? The results of a set of priming experiments suggest that motion can readily facilitate the linkage of different views of a moving human. Positive priming was found for novel views of a human body that fell within the path of human movement. However, no priming was observed for novel views outside the path of motion. Furthermore, priming was restricted to those views that satisfied the biomechanical constraints of human movement. These results suggest that visual representation of human movement may be based upon the movement limitations of the human body and may reflect a dynamic interaction of motion and object-recognition processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaizerJ SUngerleiderL GDesimoneR, 1991“Organization of visual inputs to inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques”Journal of Neuroscience11168–190
2.
BartramD J, 1974“The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming”Cognitive Psychology6325–356
3.
BiedermanI, 1987“Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding”Psychological Review94115–117
4.
BiedermanIGerhardsteinP C, 1993“Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance191162–1182
5.
BülthoffIBülthoffH HSinhaP, 1998“Top - down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception”Nature Neuroscience1254–257
6.
BülthoffH HEdelmanS, 1992“Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA8960–64
7.
CuttingJ E, 1987“Perception and information”Annual Review of Psychology3861–90
8.
CuttingJ EProffittD RKozlowskiL T, 1978“A biomechanical invariant of gait perception”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3357–372
9.
DaemsAVerfaillieK, submitted “Viewpoint-dependent priming effects in the perception of human actions and body postures”Visual Cognition
10.
DeYoeE Avan EssenD C, 1988“Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex”Trends in Neurosciences11219–226
11.
DittrichW H, 1993“Action categories and the perception of biological motion”Perception2215–22
12.
EdelmanS, 1997“Computational theories of object recognition”Trends in Cognitive Sciences1296–304
13.
EdelmanSWeinshallD, 1991“A self-organizing multiple view representation of 3-D objects”Biological Cybernetics64209–219
GoodaleM AMilnerA D, 1992“Separate visual pathways for perception and action”Trends in Neurosciences1520–25
16.
Heptulla-ChatterjeeSFreydJ JShiffrarM, 1996“Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22916–929
17.
JohanssonG, 1973“Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis”Perception & Psychophysics14201–211
18.
KourtziZShiffrarM, 1997“One-shot view-invariance in a moving world”Psychological Science8461–466
19.
KourtziZShiffrarM, 1998“The representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects”Acta Psychologica: A Special Issue on Object Perception & Memory (in press)
20.
KozlowskiL TCuttingJ E, 1977“Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display”Perception & Psychophysics21575–580
21.
LawsonRHumphreysG WWatsonD G, 1994“Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures”Perception23595–614
22.
LogothetisNPaulsJBülthoffH HPoggioT, 1994“View-dependent object recognition by monkeys”Current Biology4401–414
23.
LogothetisNPaulsJPoggioT, 1995“Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys”Current Biology5552–563
24.
MareyE J, 1895/1972Movement(New York: Arno Press and New York Times) (originally published in 1895)
25.
OloffsonUNybergLNilssonL-G, 1997“Priming and recognition of human motion patterns”Visual Cognition4373–382
26.
ParsonsL M, 1987“Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet”Cognitive Psychology19178–241
27.
PerrettD IHarriesMMistlinA JChittyA J, 1990“Three stages in the classification of body movements by visual neurons”, in Images and Understanding Eds BarlowH BWeston-SmithM(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 94–107
28.
PerrettD IOramM WWachsmuthE, 1996Evidence Accumulation in Cell Populations Responsive to Faces: An Account of Generalisation of Recognition without Mental Transformationsunpublished manuscript, St Andrews University, Scotland
29.
PoggioTEdelmanS, 1990“A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects”Nature (London)343263–266
30.
ReedC LFarahM J, 1995“The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21334–343
31.
SekulerA BPalmerS E, 1992“Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General12195–111
32.
ShepardR N, 1984“Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming”Psychological Review91417–447
33.
ShepardR, 1994“Perceptual – cognitive universals as reflections of the world”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review12–28
34.
ShepardR NJuddS A, 1976“Perceptual illusions of rotation of three-dimensional objects”Science191952–954
35.
ShiffrarM, 1994“When what meets where”Current Directions in Psychological Science396–100
36.
ShiffrarMFreydJ J, 1990“Apparent motion of the human body”Psychological Science1257–264
37.
ShiffrarMFreydJ J, 1993“Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs”Psychological Science4379–384
38.
ShiffrarMLichteyLHeptulla-ChatterjeeS, 1997“The perception of biological motion across apertures”Perception & Psychophysics5951–59
39.
ShiffrarMShepardR N, 1991“Comparison of cube rotations around axes inclined relative to the environment or to the cube”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1744–54
40.
UngerleiderL GMishkinM, 1982“Two cortical visual systems”, in Analysis of Visual Behaviour Eds IngleD GGoodaleM AMansfieldR J W(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 549–586
41.
VerfaillieK, 1992“Variant points of view on viewpoint invariance”Canadian Journal of Psychology46215–235
42.
VerfaillieK, 1993“Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance19992–1013
43.
VerfaillieKDe TroyAVan RensbergenJ, 1994“Transsaccadic integration of biological motion”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition20649–670
44.
WachsmuthEOramM WPerrettD I, 1994“Recognition of objects and their component parts: Responses of single units in the temporal cortex of the macaque”Cerebral Cortex4509–522
