We examined Wheatstone's (1838 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London128 371–394) claim that images falling on retinally corresponding points can be seen in two different directions, in violation of Hering's law of identical visual direction. Our analyses showed that random-dot stereograms contain stimulus elements that are conceptually equivalent to the line stimuli in the stereogram from which Wheatstone made his claim. Our experiment demonstrated that two lines embedded in a random-dot stereogram appeared in two different directions when they stimulated retinally corresponding points, if the disparity gradient value of the lines was infinity relative to adjacent elements. To ensure that the two lines stimulated corresponding points, observers made vergence eye movements while maintaining the perception of the two lines in two different directions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsherH, 1953“Suppression theory of binocular vision”British Journal of Ophthalmology3737–49.
2.
BanksM Svan EeRBackusB T, 1997“The computation of binocular visual direction: A re-examination of Mansfield and Legge (1996)”Vision Research371605–1610.
3.
BrewsterD, 1844“On the law of visible position in single and binocular vision and on the representation of solid figures by the union of dissimilar plane pictures on the retina”Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh15349–368.
4.
BrückeE, 1841“Über die stereoscopischen Erscheinungen und Wheatstone's Angriff auf die Lehre von den identischen Stellen der Netzhäute”Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und Wissenschaftliche Medizin8459–476.
5.
BurtPJuleszB, 1980a“Modifications of the classical notion of Panum's fusional area”Perception9671–682.
6.
BurtPJuleszB, 1980b“A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion”Science208615–617.
7.
CoganA I, 1979“The relationship between the apparent vertical and the vertical horopter”Vision Research19655–665.
8.
ErkelensC Jvan EeR, 1997a“Capture of visual direction: An unexpected phenomenon in binocular vision”Vision Research371193–1196.
9.
ErkelensC Jvan EeR, 1997b“Capture of visual direction of monocular object by adjacent binocular objects”Vision Research371735–1745.
10.
ErkelensC Jvan de GrindW A, 1994“Binocular visual direction”Vision Research342963–2969.
11.
ErkelensC JMuijsA J Mvan EeR, 1996“Binocular alignment in different depth planes”Vision Research362141–2147.
12.
van de GrindW AErkelensC JLaanA C, 1995“Binocular correspondence and visual direction”Perception24215–235.
13.
von HelmholtzH, 1867/1962Treatise on Physiological Opticsvolume 3 (New York: Dover, 1962); English translation by SouthallJ P C for the Optical Society of America (1925) from the 3rd German edition of Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (first published in 1867, Leipzig: Voss).
14.
HeringE, 1862Beiträge zur Physiologievolume 2 (Leipzig: Engelmann).
15.
HeringE, 1879/1942Spatial Sense and Movement of the Eye; English translation by RaddleC A (Baltimore, MD: American Academy of Optometry, 1942) of “Der Raumsinn und die Bewegung des Auges”, in Handbuch der Physiologie Ed. HermannL, Band 3, Teil 1 (Leipzig: Vogel, 1879).
16.
HowardIRogersB, 1995Binocular Vision and Stereopsis (New York: Oxford University Press).
17.
KaufmanL, 1974Sight and Mind (New York: Oxford University Press).
MansfieldJ SLeggeG E, 1996“The binocular computation of visual direction”Vision Research3627–41.
20.
MappA POnoH, 1999“Wondering about the wandering cyclopean eye”Vision Research392381–2386.
21.
NagelA, 1861Das Sehen mil zwei Augen und die Lehre von den identischen Netzhautstellen (Leipzig: Winter).
22.
NakamizoSOnoHUjikeH, 1999“Subjective staircase: A multiple wallpaper illusion”Perception & Psychophysics6113–22.
23.
NakayamaK, 1977“Geometric and physiological aspects of depth perception”Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrument Engineers1202–9.
24.
OnoH, 1991“Binocular visual directions of an object when seen as single or double”, in Binocular Vision Ed. ReganD, volume 9 of Vision and Visual Dysfunction Ed. Cronly-DillonJ R (London: MacMillan) pp 1–18.
25.
OnoHAngusRGregorP, 1977“Binocular single vision achieved by fusion and suppression”Perception & Psychophysics21513–521.
26.
OnoHKomodaMMuellerE R, 1971“Intermittent stimulation of binocular disparate colors and central color fusion”Perception & Psychophysics9343–347.
27.
OnoHMappA P, 1995“A restatement and modification of Wells — Hering's laws of visual direction”Perception24237–252.
28.
OnoHWadeN, 1985“Resolving discrepant results of the Wheatstone experiment”Psychological Research47135–142.
29.
ReganDErkelensC JCollewijnH, 1986“Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science27584–597.
30.
RogersB JBradshawM F, 1999“Disparity minimisation, cyclovergence, and the validity of nonius lines as a technique for measuring torsional alignment”Perception28127–141.
31.
ShimonoKOnoHSaidaSMappA P, 1998“Methodological caveats for monitoring eye position with Nonius stimuli”Vision Research38591–600.
32.
TylerC, 1991“The horopter and binocular fusion”, in Binocular Vision Ed. ReganD, volume 9 of Vision and Visual Dysfunction Ed. Cronly-DillonJ R (London: MacMillan) pp 19–37.
33.
VolkmannA W, 1859“Die stereoskopischen Erscheinungen in ihrer Beziehung zu der Lehre von den identischen Netzhautstellen”Archiv für Ophthalmologie51–100.
34.
WestheimerG, 1976“Oculomotor control: The vergence system”, in Eye Movement and Psychological Processes Eds MontyR ASendersJ W (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates) pp 55–64.
35.
WheatstoneC, 1838“Contribution to the physiology of vision—Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of the binocular vision”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London128371–394.
36.
WolfeJ M, 1986“Stereopsis and binocular rivalry”Psychological Review93269–282.
