Carryover of stimuli in sequential judgments was studied for a visual assessment task involving estimation of the percentage cover of black circles on a white image. Seven image types with different levels of cover density were arranged in a sequentially balanced design in which each image type was preceded the same number of times by all image types. In the absence of carryover, when images were preceded by images with the same cover density, the response scores were well fitted by a power function of percentage cover with a mean exponent of 0.73 over subjects. Carryover took the form of an assimilation, so that the cover estimate for a target image was generally higher when preceded by an image with higher cover, and lower when preceded by an image with lower cover. However, the magnitude of the carryover effect showed little evidence of increasing with difference in cover between successive images. Nonparametric and parametric methods for testing for carryover are presented. The need for development of psychological models to explain the proposed statistical models is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BairdJ CBerglundBBerglundULindbergS, 1991“Stimulus sequence and the exponent of the power function for loudness”Perceptual and Motor Skills733–17.
2.
BeckJ, 1966“Contrast and assimilation in brightness judgements”Psychonomic Science1342–344.
3.
ConnerM TLandD GBoothD A, 1987“Effect of stimulus range on judgements of sweetness intensity in a lime drink”British Journal of Psychology78237–264.
4.
CressieN, 1991Statistics for Spatial Data (New York: John Wiley).
5.
CrossD V, 1973“Sequential dependencies and regression in psychophysical judgments”Perception & Psychophysics14547–552.
6.
DeCarloL T, 1992“Intertrial interval and sequential effects in magnitude scaling”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance181080–1088.
7.
DeCarloL T, 1994“A dynamic theory of proportional judgment: Context and judgment of length, heaviness and roughness”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20372–381.
8.
DeCarloL TCrossD V, 1990“Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: Models and theory”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General119375–396.
9.
DiLolloV, 1964“Contrast effects in the judgement of lifted weights”Journal of Experimental Psychology68383–387.
10.
FerrisS J, 1999Response Models and Efficient Designs for Change-over Experiments with Treatment Carryover PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
11.
FinneyD J, 1956“Cross-over designs in bioassay”Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B14542–61.
12.
FinneyD JOuthwaiteA D, 1956“Serially balanced sequences in bioassay”Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B145493–507.
13.
GescheiderG A, 1988“Psychophysical scaling”Annual Review of Psychology39169–200.
14.
JamesW C, 1971“An illustrated series of assessment keys for plant diseases, their preparation and usage”Canadian Plant Disease Survey5139–65.
15.
JesteadtWLuceD RGreenD M, 1977“Sequential effects in judgements of loudness”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance392–104.
16.
JonesBKenwardM G, 1989Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials (London: Chapman & Hall).
17.
KemptonR AFerrisS JDavidO, 2001“Efficiency of change-over designs when carryover effects are proportional to direct effects of treatments”Biometrika88391–399.
18.
KruegerL E, 1972“Perceived numerosity”Perception & Psychophysics115–9.
19.
KruegerL E, 1984“Perceived numerosity: A Comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgements”Perception & Psychophysics35536–542.
20.
LamingD, 1984“The relativity of ‘absolute’ judgement”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology37152–183.
21.
LawlessH, 1983“Contextual effects in category ratings”Journal of Testing and Evaluation11346–349.
22.
LuceR DNosofskyR MGreenD MSmithA F, 1982“The bow and sequential effects in absolute identification”Perception & Psychophysics32397–408.
23.
MarleyAAJCookV T, 1984“A fixed rehearsal capacity interpretation of limits on absolute identification performance”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology37136–151.
24.
McKennaF P, 1984“Assimilation and contrast in perceptual judgements”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A36531–548.
25.
MorrisR BRuleS J, 1988“Sequential judgement effects in magnitude estimation”Canadian Journal of Psychology4269–77.
26.
NewtonA CHackettC A, 1994“Subjective components of mildew assessment on spring barley”European Journal of Plant Pathology100395–412.
27.
ParducciA, 1965“Category judgment: A range-frequency model”Psychological Review72407–418.
28.
SawyerTWesenstenN J, 1994“Anchoring effects on judgement estimation and discrimination of numerosity”Perceptual and Motor Skills7891–98.
29.
SchiffersteinHNJFrijtersJER, 1992“Contextual and sequential effects on judgements of sweetness intensity”Perception & Psychophysics52243–255.
30.
SchiffersteinHNJOudejansI M, 1996“Determinants of cumulative successive contrast in saltiness intensity judgements”Perception & Psychophysics58713–724.
31.
SherwoodR TBergC CHooverM RZeidersK E, 1983“Illusions in visual assessment of Stagonospora leaf spot of orchardgrass”Phytopathology73173–177.
32.
StevensS S, 1957“On the psychophysical law”Psychological Review64153–181.
33.
WardL M, 1973“Repeated magnitude estimation with a variable standard: Sequential effects and other properties”Perception & Psychophysics13193–200.
34.
WardL MLockheadG R, 1970“Sequential effects and memory in category judgements”Journal of Experimental Psychology8427–34.
35.
WilliamsR M, 1952“Experimental designs for serially correlated observations”Biometrika39151–167.
