Cleomedes (Kleomedes) is a little-known Greek author (c. 1st century AD) who produced what is probably the earliest extant statement of size – distance invariance. He supported the Stoic philosophy and was concerned to discredit the Epicurean position that we perceive objects as having their true size. He explained the celestial illusion (the apparent enlargement of the sun near the horizon) in two ways: partly as a refractive effect of the atmosphere similar to angular enlargement when looking into water; and partly as a linear enlargement due to increased apparent distance in a misty atmosphere. He is the earliest extant author to offer apparent distance as a clear explanation of the celestial illusion. He attributed these views to Posidonius (c. 135–50 BC). His explanations remained at the geometrical level, and he did not speculate on sensory mechanisms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aristotle, 1923Meteorologica translated by WebsterE W (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
2.
BalfourR, 1605Cleomedis Meteora Graece et Latine (Bordeaux: S Milangius).
BurtonH E, 1945“The optics of Euclid”Journal of the Optical Society of America35357–372.
5.
CancikHSchneiderH (Eds), 1999Der Neue Pauly: Enzyklopädie der Antike (Stuttgart: Metzler), volume 6, pp 578–579; volume 7, pp 584–585.
6.
CohenM RDrabkinI E, 1948A Source Book in Greek Science (New York: McGraw-Hill).
7.
CzwalinaA (Ed. and Trans.), 1927Kleomedes, Die Kreisbewegung der Gestirne (Leipzig: Ostwalds Klassiker220).
8.
DicksD R, 1971“Cleomedes”, in Dictionary of Scientific Biographyvolume III, Ed. Gilles-PieC C (New York: Scribner) pp 318–320.
9.
EdelsteinLKiddI G (Eds), 1989Posidonius volume I The Fragments2nd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
10.
GoldsteinB R, 1967“The Arabic version of Ptolemy's ‘Planetary Hypotheses’”Transactions of the American Philosophical Society new series 57 Part 4, 3–12.
11.
GouletR (Ed. and Trans.), 1980Cléomède: Theorie élèmentaire (De motu circulari corporum caelestium) (Paris: Librairie Philosophique J Vrin).
12.
GouletR, 1994Dictionnaire desphilosophes antiquesVolume II (Paris: CNRS-Éditions) pp 436–439.
GregoryJ, 1668Geometria Pars Universalis (pp 141–142), translated by MollonJ DRossH, 1975“Gregory on the sun illusion”Perception4115–118.
15.
HamiltonJ E, 1964“Factors affecting the moon illusion”American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry41490–493.
16.
HeathT L, 1932Greek Astronomy (London: Dent).
17.
HershensonM (Ed.), 1989The Moon Illusion (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
18.
HornblowerSSpawforthA (Eds), 1996Oxford Classical Dictionary3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
19.
KiddI G (Ed.), 1988Posidonius volume II The Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
20.
KiddI G (Trans.), 1999Posidonius volume III The Translation of the Fragments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
21.
KrollW (Ed.), 1922Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft—neue Bearbeitung begonnen von Georg WissowaVolume 11 (Stuttgart: Metzler) pp 679–694.
22.
NeugebauerO E, 1975A History of Ancient Mathematical AstronomyVolume II (Berlin: Springer) pp 960–961.
23.
New Encyclopaedia Britannica1997 (London: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.).
24.
O'SheaR PBlackburnS POnoH, 1994“Contrast as a depth cue”Vision Research341595–1604.
25.
O'SheaR PGovanD JSekulerR, 1997“Blur and contrast as pictorial depth cues”Perception26599–612.
26.
PlugCRossH E, 1989“Historical review”, in The Moon Illusion Ed. HershensonM (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 5–27.
27.
RossH E, 1967“Water, fog and the size – distance invariance hypothesis”British Journal of Psychology58312–313.
28.
RossH E, 1975“Mist, murk and visual perception”New Scientist66658–660.
29.
RossH E, 1993“Do judgements of distance and greyness follow the physics of aerial perspective?”, in Fechner Day ′93 Eds Garriga-TrilloAMinonP RGarcia-GallegoCLubinPMerinoJ MVillarinoA (Palma de Mallorca, Spain: International Society for Psychophysics) pp 233–238.
30.
RossH EPlugC, 1998“The history of size constancy and size illusions”, in Perceptual Constancy: Why Things Look as They Do Eds WalshVKulikowskiJ J (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 499–528.
31.
RossH ERossG M, 1976“Did Ptolemy understand the moon illusion?”Perception5377–395.
32.
SabraA I, 1987“Psychology versus mathematics: Ptolemy and Alhazen on the moon illusion”, in Mathematics and Its Applications to Science and Natural Philosophy in the Middle Ages Eds GrantEMurdochJ E (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 217–247.
33.
SabraA I, 1995–1996“On seeing the stars, II”Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islam-ischen Wissenschaften101–59 (including additions and corrections to the 1987 publication).
34.
SchmidtI, 1964“Is there a moon illusion in space?”Aerospace Medicine35572–575.
35.
SchöbeckG L J, 1998Sunbowl or Symbol: Models for the Interpretation of Heraclitus' Sun Notion (Amsterdam: Elixir Press) pp 32–33.
36.
SchumacherW, 1975Untersuchungen zur Datierung des Astronomen Kleomedes dissertation, Cologne University, Cologne, Germany.
37.
SmithA M, 1982“Ptolemy's search for a law of refraction: A Case-study in the classical methodology of ‘saving the appearances’ and its limitations”Archive for the History of the Exact Sciences26221–240.
38.
SmithA M, 1996Ptolemy's Theory of Visual Perception: An English Translation of the Optics with Introduction and Commentary (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, Volume 86, Part 2) (Philadelphia, PA: The American Philosophical Society).
39.
Strabo, 1962The Geography translated by LeeH D P, Loeb Classical Library (London: Heinemann).
ToddR, 1992“Cleomedes”, in Catalogus translationum et commentariorum: mediaeval and renaissance Latin translations and commentaries. Annotated lists and guidesVolume 7 Ed. BrownV (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press) pp 1–11.
42.
WadeN J, 1998a“Light and sight since antiquity”Perception27637–670.
43.
WadeN J, 1998bA Natural History of Vision (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
44.
ZieglerH (Ed. and Trans.), 1891Cleomedis de motu circulari corporum caelestium libri duo (Leipzig: Teubner).
