The positional specificity of short-term visual memory for a variety of 3-D shapes was investigated in a series of ‘same’/‘different’ discrimination experiments, with computer-rendered stimuli displayed either at the same or at different locations in the visual field. For animal-like shapes, we found complete translation invariance, regardless of the interstimulus similarity, and irrespective of direction and size of the displacement (experiments 1 and 2). Invariance to translation was obtained also with animal-like stimuli that had been ‘scrambled’ by randomizing the relative locations of their parts (experiment 3). The invariance broke down when the stimuli were made to differ in their composition, but not in the shapes of the corresponding parts (experiments 4 and 5). We interpret this pattern of findings in the context of several current theories of recognition, focusing in particular on the issue of the representation of object structure.
BiedermanI, 1987“Recognition by components: A Theory of human image understanding”Psychological Review94115–147.
3.
BiedermanICooperE E, 1991“Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming”Perception20585–593.
4.
BricoloE, 1996On the Representation of Novel Objects: Human Psychophysics, Monkey Physiology and Computational Models PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
5.
BricoloEBülthoffH H, 1992“Translation-invariant features for object recognition”Perception21Supplement2, 59.
6.
BricoloEBulthoffH H, 1993“Rotation, translation, size and illumination invariances in 3D object recognition”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science34(4) 1081.
7.
BulthoffH HEdelmanS, 1992“Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA8960–64.
8.
BurlM CWeberMPeronaP, 1998“A probabilistic approach to object recognition using local photometry and global geometry”, in Proceedings of the European Conference on Computational Vision Ed. BurkhardtHNeumannB, LNCS-Series Volume 1406–1407 (Berlin: Springer) pp 628–641.
9.
CampsO IHuangC-YKanungoT, 1998“Hierarchical organization of appearance-based parts and relations for object recognition”, in Proceedings of ICCV (Washington, DC: IEEE) pp 685–691.
10.
CaveK RPinkerSGiorgiLThomasC EHellerL MWolfeJ MLinH, 1994“The representation of location in visual images”Cognitive Psychology261–32.
11.
DillMFahleM, 1997a“Limited translation invariance of human visual pattern recognition”Perception & Psychophysics6065–81.
12.
DillMFahleM, 1997b“The role of visual field position in pattern-discrimination learning”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B2641031–1036.
13.
EdelmanS, 1995a“Class similarity and viewpoint invariance in the recognition of 3D objects”Biological Cybernetics72207–220.
14.
EdelmanS, 1995b“Representation, similarity, and the chorus of prototypes”Minds and Machines545–68.
15.
EdelmanS, 1999Representation and Recognition in Vision (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
16.
EdelmanSBulthoffH H, 1992“Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects”Vision Research322385–2400.
17.
EdelmanSIntratorN, 2000“(Coarse Coding of Shape Fragments) + (Retinotopy) Representation of Structure”Spatial Vision13255–264.
18.
FodorJ A, 1998Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
19.
FosterD HKahnJ I, 1985“Internal representations and operations in the visual comparison of transformed patterns: Effects of pattern point-inversion, positional symmetry, and separation”Biological Cybernetics51305–312.
20.
FujitaITanakaKItoMChengK, 1992“Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex”Nature360343–346.
21.
GreenD MSwetsJ A, 1966Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (New York: John Wiley).
22.
HummelJ E, 2000“Where view-based theories of human object recognition break down: The role of structure in human shape perception”, in Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual Change in Humans and Machines Ed. DietrichEMarkmanA chapter 7 (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
23.
ItoMTamuraHFujitaITanakaK, 1995“Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex”Journal of Neurophysiology73218–226.
24.
JolicoeurPHumphreyG K, 1998“Perception of rotated two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects and visual shapes”, in Perceptual Constancies Ed. WalshVKulikowskiJ chapter 10 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 69–123.
25.
KobatakeETanakaK, 1994“Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex”Journal of Neurophysiology71856–867.
26.
LarsenABundesenC, 1998“Effects of spatial separation in visual pattern matching: Evidence on the role of mental translation”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24719–731.
27.
LogothetisN KPaulsJPoggioT, 1995“Shape recognition in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys”Current Biology5552–563.
28.
LogothetisN KSheinbergD L, 1996“Visual object recognition”Annual Review of Neuroscience19577–621.
29.
MacmillanN ACreelmanC D, 1991Detection Theory: A User's Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
30.
MacmillanN AKaplanH LCreelmanC D, 1977“The psychophysics of categorical perception”Psychological Review84452–471.
31.
NazirTO'ReganJ K, 1990“Some results on translation invariance in the human visual system”Spatial Vision581–100.
32.
NeisserU, 1967Cognitive Psychology (New York: Appleton – Century – Crofts).
33.
PhillipsW A, 1974“On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory”Perception & Psychophysics16283–290.
34.
RainerGAsaadWMillerE K, 1998“Memory fields of neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA9515008–15013.
35.
RaoS CRainerGMillerE K, 1997“Integration of what and where in the primate prefrontal cortex”Science276821–824.
36.
RollsE T, 1996“Visual processing in the temporal lobe for invariant object recognition”, in Neurobiology Ed. TorreVContiT (New York: Plenum) pp 325–353.
37.
SAS, 1989User's Guide, Version 6 (Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.).
38.
SaslowM G, 1967“Latency for saccadic eye movement”Journal of the Optical Society of America571030–1036.
39.
TanakaK, 1996“Inferotemporal cortex and object vision”Annual Review of Neuroscience19109–139.
40.
ToveeM JRollsE TAzzopardiP, 1994“Translation invariance in the responses to faces of single neurons in the temporal visual cortical areas of the alert monkey”Journal of Neurophysiology721049–1060.
41.
WallachHAustin-AdamsP, 1954“Recognition and the localization of visual traces”American Journal of Psychology67338–340.
