Displays were presented consisting of a perspective projection of a regular square grid, made up of vertical and horizontal equally spaced white lines, that was slanted in depth. The surface was viewed monocularly, through a circular aperture. A range of slants was shown (0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, or 60°) and the observers' task was to match the slant by means of a mouse-driven probe. The viewing distance (50, 75, or 100 cm) as well as the focal distance (25, 50, 75, 100, or 125 cm) were varied. We expected the estimation error to be smallest when the viewing distance and the focal distance coincided. This was not the case. Instead, subjects seemed to use the perspective deformation of the texture elements in the stimulus display to make a slant estimation, regardless of the specific combination of viewing distance and focal distance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenGJBraunsteinMLSaidpourA, 1998“The perception of depth and slant from texture in three-dimensional scenes”Perception271087–1106
2.
BengstonJKStergoisJCWardJLJesterRE, 1980“Optic array determinants of apparent distance and size in pictures”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance6751–759
3.
BlakeABulthoffHHSheinbergD, 1993“Shape from texture: Ideal observers and human psychophysics”Vision Research331723–1737
4.
BraunsteinML, 1976Depth Perception through Motion (New York: Academic Press)
5.
BraunsteinMLPayneJW, 1969“Perspective and form ratio as determinants of relative slant judgements”Journal of Experimental Psychology81584–590
6.
BuckleyDFrisbyJPBlakeA, 1996“Does the human visual system implement an ideal observer theory of slant from texture?”Vision Research361163–1176
7.
CuttingJE, 1986Perception with an Eye for Motion (Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press)
8.
CuttingJEMillardRT, 1984“These gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General133198–216
9.
FarberJRosinskiRR, 1978“Geometric transformations of pictured space”Perception7269–282
10.
FreemanRBJr, 1966“Effect of size on visual slant”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance7196–103
11.
FrisbyJPBuckleyDFreemanJ, 1995“Stereo and texture cue integration in the perception of planar and curved large real surfaces”, in Attention and Performance: Integration in Perception and Communication Eds InuiTMcClellandJL (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 71–91
12.
GibsonJJ, 1950aThe Perception of the Visual World (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin)
13.
GibsonJJ, 1950b“The perception of visual surfaces”American Journal of Psychology63367–384
14.
KnillDC, 1998“Ideal observer perturbation analysis reveals human strategies for inferring surface orientation from texture”Vision Research382635–2656
15.
KraftRNGreenJS, 1989“Distance perception as a function of photographic area of view”Perception & Psychophysics45459–466
16.
KubovyM, 1986The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
17.
LumsdenEA, 1980“Problems of magnification and minification: An explanation of the distortions of distance, slant, shape and velocity”, in The Perception of Pictures volume 1 Alberti's Window: The Projective Model of Pictorial Information Ed. HagenMA (New York: Academic Press) pp 91–135
18.
PerroneJA, 1980“Visual slant underestimation: a model based on the size of the viewing aperture”Perception9285–302
19.
PerroneJA, 1982“Visual slant underestimation: a general model”Perception11641–654
20.
PurdyWC, 1960“The hypothesis of psychophysical correspondence in space perception”Electric Technical Information Series number R60ELC56
21.
RogersS, 1995“Perceiving pictorial space”, in Handbook of Perception and Cognition volume 1 Perception of Space and Motion Eds EpsteinWRogersS (San Diego, CA: Academic Press) pp 23–61
22.
SedgwickHA, 1983“Environment-centered representation of spatial layout: available visual information from texture and perspective”, in Human and Machine Vision Eds BeckJRosenfeldA (New York: Academic Press) pp 425–458
23.
SmithAH, 1958“Comparison of apparent depth in a photograph viewed from two distances”Perceptual and Motor Skills879–81
24.
SmithOWGruberH, 1958“Perception of depth in photographs”Perceptual and Motor Skills8307–313
25.
StevensKA, 1980Surface Perception from Local Analysis of Texture and Contour, unpublished PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
26.
ToddJTAkerstromRA, 1987“Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13242–255
