The impression of self-luminosity in the glare effect was studied in two experiments. In experiment 1 the target (CS) was set to the highest luminance of the field and subjects were asked to adjust the luminance ramp of the inducers (R) against five backgrounds (B) to the point where they began to see CS as self-luminous. It was found that there is a linear relationship between background and luminance ramp. Another group of subjects carried out the same task in experiment 2, but this time CS and R were linked together so that CS would always have the same luminance as the highest luminance level of R, as adjustments were performed. It was found that: (i) adjustments were always lower than the highest luminance available; (ii) the linear relationship between background and luminance ramp was confirmed; (iii) observers reported a compelling impression of self-luminous grays. Data are discussed in relation to Bonato and Gilchrist's model for the perception of luminosity. The authors advance the hypothesis that luminance ramps are used at an early stage of encoding for the perception of luminosity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgostiniTGalmonteA, 1997“Further evidence of the effect of gradient on lightness”Perception26Supplement, 27
2.
AgostiniTGalmonteA, in press “A new effect of luminance gradient on achromatic simultaneous contrast”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
3.
ArendLEGoldsteinR, 1988“Lightness models, gradient illusions, and curl”Perception & Psychophysics4265–80
4.
BergstromSS, 1966“A paradox in the perception of luminance gradients: I”Scandinavian Journal of Psychology7209–224
5.
BonatoFCataliottiJ, 1996“Perceived area and figure/ground relations affect the luminosity threshold”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science37(4) S174
6.
BonatoFGilchristAL, 1994“The perception of luminosity on different backgrounds and in different illuminations”Perception23991–1006
7.
BonatoFGilchristAL, 1999“Perceived area and the luminosity threshold”Perception & Psychophysics61786–797
8.
CataliottiJGilchristAL, 1995“Local and global processes in lightness perception”Perception & Psychophysics57125–135
9.
EvansRM, 1974The Perception of Color (New York: John Wiley)
10.
GilchristALBonatoF, 1995“Anchoring of lightness values in center — surround displays”Journal of Experimental Psychology211427–1440
11.
GilchristALKossifydisCBonatoFAgostiniTCataliottiJLiXSpeharBAnnanVEconomouE, 1999“An anchoring theory of lightness perception”Psychological Review106795–834
12.
HeringE, 1879/1942Spatial Sense and Movements of the Eye (1942, Baltimore, MD: American Academy of Optometry); English translation by RaddeC A of “Der Raumsinn und die Bewegungen des Auges”, in Handbuch der Physiologie Ed. HermannL, volume 3, part 1 (1879, Leipzig: Vogel)
13.
KatzD, 1935The World of Colour (London: Kegan Paul)
14.
KennedyJM, 1976“Sun figure: an illusory diffuse contour resulting from an arrangement of dots”Perception5479–481
15.
KennedyJMGreenCDVervaekeJ, 1993“Metaphoric thought and devices in pictures”Metaphor and Symbolic Activity8243–255
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World)
18.
KozakiANoguchiK, 1976“The relationship between perceived surface-lightness and perceived illumination: A manifestation of perceptual scission”Psychological Research391–16
19.
LandEHMcCannJJ, 1971“Lightness and retinex theory”Journal of the Optical Society of America611–11
20.
LiXGilchristAL, 1999“Relative area and relative luminance combine to anchor surface lightness values”Perception & Psychophysics61771–785
21.
LieI, 1977“Perception of illumination”Scandinavian Journal of Psychology18251–255
McCannJJ, 1998“Analysis of contrast experiments when corrected for intraocular scatter”Perception27Supplement, 84–85
24.
NoguchiKKozakiA, 1985“Perceptual scission of surface-lightness and illumination: An examination of the Gelb effect”Psychological Research4719–25
25.
TetsukaHKatsumiOMorandiAJTetsukaSWangGJHiroseT, 1992“Effect of light scatter on the pattern reversal visual evoked response: Comparison with psychophysical results”Vision Research321211–1218
26.
UllmanS, 1976“On visual detection of light sources”Biological Cybernetics21205–212
27.
VicarioGB, 1996“La luce nella prospettiva della psicologia della percezione”Atti dell'Accademia Patavina di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti1085–22
28.
WallachH, 1948“Brightness constancy and the nature of achromatic colors”Journal of Experimental Psychology38310–324
29.
WallachH, 1963“The perception of neutral colors”Scientific American20156–60
30.
WallachH, 1976On Perception (New York: Quadrangle/The New York Times Book Company)
31.
YamauchiYUchikawaK, 1998“Effects of non-uniform illumination on the mode of color appearance”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science39S157
32.
ZavagnoD, 1999a“Phenomenal glare, black holes and other gradient effects”, in Research in Perception. Proceedings of the Meeting in Memory of Fabio Metelli Eds ZanforlinMTommasiL (Padua: Logos) pp 303–306
33.
ZavagnoD, 1999b“Some new luminance-gradient effects”Perception28835–838
34.
ZavagnoD, 1999c“A new effect of space brightness enhancement”Perception28Supplement, 71
ZavagnoDCaputoG, 1997“Luminosity thresholds in induced luminosity displays”, in Fechner Day 97, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics Eds PreisAHornowskiT (Poznań, Poland: International Society for Psychophysics) pp 321–326
37.
ZavagnoDMassironiM, 1997“La rappresentazione della luce nelle opere d'arte grafica”Giornale Italiano di Psicologia24135–187
