Subjects were examined for practice effects in a stereoscopic slant-estimation task involving surfaces that comprised a large portion of the visual field. In most subjects slant estimation was significantly affected by practice, but only when an isolated surface (an absolute disparity gradient) was present in the visual field. When a second, unslanted, surface was visible (providing a second disparity gradient and thereby also a relative disparity gradient) none of the subjects exhibited practice effects. Apparently, stereoscopic slant estimation is more robust or stable over time in the presence of a second surface than in its absence. In order to relate the practice effects, which occurred without feedback, to perceptual learning, results are interpreted within a cue-interaction framework. In this paradigm the contribution of a cue depends on its reliability. It is suggested that normally absolute disparity gradients contribute relatively little to perceived slant and that subjects learn to increase this contribution by utilizing proprioceptive information. It is argued that—given the limited computational power of the brain—a relatively small contribution of absolute disparity gradients in perceived slant enhances the stability of stereoscopic slant perception.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsWJBanksMSvan EeR, 2001“Effect of prolonged wearing of horizontal magnifier”Nature Neuroscience submitted for publication
2.
AllisonRSHowardIP, 2000“Temporal dependencies in resolving monocular and binocular cue conflict in slant perception”Vision Research401869–1886
3.
AllisonRSHowardIPRogersBJBridgeH, 1998“Temporal aspects of slant and inclination perception”Perception271287–1304
4.
BackusBTBanksMS, 1999“Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception”Perception28217–242
5.
BackusBTBanksMSvan EeRCrowellJA, 1999“Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception”Vision Research391143–1170
6.
BanksMSBackusBT, 1998“Extra-retinal and perspective cues cause the small range of the induced effect”Vision Research38187–194
7.
BedfordFL, 1993“Perceptual learning”The Psychology of Learning and Motivation301–60
8.
BradshawMFRogersBJDe BruynB, 1995“Perceptual latency and complex random-dot stereograms”Perception24749–759
9.
CollewijnHvan der SteenJvan RijnLJ, 1991“Binocular eye movements and depth perception”, in Representations of Vision, Trends and Tacit Assumptions in Vision Research Ed. GoreaA (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 165–183
10.
CummingBJohnstonEParkerA, 1993“Effects of different texture cues on curved surfaces viewed stereoscopically”Vision Research33827–838
11.
CuttingJEMillardRT, 1984“Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113198–216
12.
DosherBASperlingGWurstSA, 1986“Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure”Vision Research26973–990
13.
EbenholtzSMPaapKR, 1973“The constancy of object orientation: Compensation for ocular rotation”Perception & Psychophysics14458–470
14.
van EeR, 1995Stability of Binocular Depth Perception (Utrecht: Utrecht University)
15.
van EeRBackusBTErkelensCJ, 1996“Perceptual learning in stereoscopic slant estimation”, Internal Report of the Helmholtz Institute UU-PA-pmi-088, Utrecht, The Netherlands
16.
van EeRBanksMSBackusBT, 1999“An analysis of binocular slant contrast”Perception281121–1145
17.
van EeRErkelensCJ, 1996a“Stability of binocular depth perception with moving head and eyes”Vision Research363827–3842
18.
van EeRErkelensCJ, 1996b“Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception”Vision Research3643–51
19.
van EeRErkelensCJ, 1998“Temporal aspects of stereoscopic slant estimation: An evaluation and extension of Howard and Kaneko's theory”Vision Research383871–3882
20.
van EeRErkelensCJ, 1999“The influence of large scanning eye movements on stereoscopic slant estimation of large surfaces”Vision Research39467–497
21.
ErkelensCJCollewijnH, 1985a“Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms”Vision Research251689–1700
22.
ErkelensCJCollewijnH, 1985b“Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms”Vision Research25583–588
23.
ErkelensCJvan EeR, 1998“A computational model of depth perception based on headcentric disparity”Vision Research382999–3018
24.
FahleMEdelmanSPoggioT, 1995“Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity”Vision Research353003–3013
25.
FahleMHenke-FahleS, 1996“Interobserver variance in perceptual performance and learning”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science37869–877
26.
FendickMWestheimerG, 1983“Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity”Vision Research23145–150
27.
FielderARMoseleyMJ, 1996“Does stereopsis matter in humans?”Eye10233–238
28.
FiorentiniABerardiN, 1980“Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency”Nature28743–44
29.
FisherSKCiuffredaKJ, 1988“Accommodation and apparent distance”Perception17609–621
30.
FrisbyJPBuckleyDHorsmanJM, 1995“Integration of stereo, texture, and outline cues during pinhole viewing of real ridge-shaped objects and stereograms of ridges”Perception24181–198
31.
GardingJPorrillJMayhewJEFrisbyJP, 1995“Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations”Vision Research35703–722
32.
GillamBJ, 1967“Changes in the direction of induced aniseikonic slant as a function of distance”Vision Research7777–783
33.
GillamBJ, 1968“Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: experiments with aniseikonic lenses”Journal of Experimental Psychology78299–305
34.
GillamBJ, 1993“Stereoscopic slant reversals: a new kind of ‘induced’ effect”Perception221025–1036
35.
GillamBJBlackburnSG, 1998“Surface separation decreases stereoscopic slant but a monocular aperture increases it”Perception271267–1286
36.
GillamBJChambersDRussoT, 1988“Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14163–175
37.
GillamBJFlaggTFinlayD, 1984“Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing”Perception & Psychophysics36559–564
GillamBJRyanC, 1992“Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception”Perception21427–439
40.
GlennersterAMcKeeSP, 1999“Bias and sensitivity of stereo judgements in the presence of a slanted reference frame”Vision Research393057–3069
41.
GlennersterARogersBJBradshawMF, 1996“Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task”Vision Research363441–3456
42.
GogelWC, 1972“Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance”American Journal of Psychology85477–497
43.
GogelWCSturmRD, 1972“A comparison of accommodative and fusional convergence as cues to distance”Perception & Psychophysics11166–168
44.
GrantVW, 1942“Accommodation and convergence in visual space perception”Journal of Experimental Psychology3189–104
45.
von HelmholtzH, 1867/1962Treatise on Physiological Opticsvolume 3 (New York: Dover, 1962); English translation by SouthallJ P C for the Optical Society of America (1925) from the 3rd German edition of Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (first published in 1867, Leipzig: Voss)
46.
HowardIPKanekoH, 1994“Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination”Vision Research342505–2517
47.
HowardIPRogersBJ, 1995Binocular Vision and Stereopsis (New York: Oxford University Press)
48.
JohnstonEBCummingBGParkerAJ, 1993“Integration of depth modules: Stereopsis and texture”Vision Research33813–826
49.
KanekoHHowardIP, 1996“Relative size disparities and the perception of surface slant”Vision Research361919–1930
50.
KarniASagiD, 1993“The time course of learning a visual skill”Nature365250–252
51.
KarniATanneDRubensteinBSAskenasyJJMSagiD, 1994“Dependence on REM sleep of overnight improvement of a perceptual skill”Science265679–682
52.
KumarTGlaserDA, 1992“Shape analysis and stereopsis for human depth perception”Vision Research32499–512
53.
KumarTGlaserDA, 1993“Initial performance, learning and observer variability for hyperacuity tasks”Vision Research332287–2300
54.
LandyMSMaloneyLTJohnstonEBYoungM, 1995“Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion”Vision Research35389–412
55.
McKeeSPLeviDMBowneSF, 1990“The imprecision of stereopsis”Vision Research301763–1779
56.
McKeeSPWestheimerG, 1978“Improvement in vernier acuity with practice”Perception & Psychophysics24258–262
57.
MaloneyLTLandyMS, 1989“A statistical framework for robust fusion of depth information”SPIE, Visual Communications and Image Processing IV11991154–1162
58.
MayhewJELonguet-HigginsHC, 1982“A computational model of binocular depth perception”Nature297376–378
59.
MitchisonGJMcKeeSP, 1990“Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception”Vision Research301781–1791
60.
MitchisonGJWestheimerG, 1984“The perception of depth in simple figures”Vision Research241063–1073
61.
OgleKN, 1938“Induced size effect. I. A new phenomenon in binocular space perception associated with the relative sizes of the images of the two eyes”Archives of Ophthalmology20604–623
62.
PoggioTFahleMEdelmanS, 1992“Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity”Science2561018–1021
63.
PorrillJMayhewJEWFrisbyJP, 1990“Cyclotorsion, conformal invariance, and induced effects in stereoscopic vision”, in Image Understanding Eds UllmanSRichardsW (Norwood, NJ: Ablex) pp 185–196
64.
RamachandranVS, 1976“Learning-like phenomena in stereopsis”Science256382–384
65.
RogersBJBradshawMF, 1995“Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces”Perception24155–179
66.
RogersBJGrahamM, 1983“Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces”Science2211409–1411
67.
RyanCGillamB, 1994“Cue conflict and stereoscopic surface slant about horizontal and vertical axes”Perception23645–658
68.
StevensKA, 1981“The information content of texture gradients”Biological Cybernetics4295–105
69.
StevensKABrookesA, 1987“Depth reconstruction in stereopsis”, in Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society) pp 682–686
70.
StevensKABrookesA, 1988“Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces”Vision Research28371–386
71.
TurnerMRGersteinGLBajcsyR, 1991“Underestimation of visual texture slant by human observers: a model”Biological Cybernetics65215–226
72.
TylerCW, 1974“Depth perception in disparity gratings”Nature251140–142
73.
TylerCW, 1991“Cyclopean vision”, in Vision and Visual Disfunction Ed. JR Cronly-Dillon, volume 9 Binocular Vision Ed. ReganD (London: Macmillan) pp 38–73
74.
WallachHBaconJ, 1976“Two forms of retinal disparity”Perception & Psychophysics19375–382
75.
WernerH, 1938“Binocular depth-contrast and the conditions of the binocular field”American Journal of Psychology51489–497
76.
WestheimerG, 1979“Cooperative neural processes involved in stereoscopic acuity”Experimental Brain Research18893–912
77.
WrightWD, 1951“The role of convergence in stereoscopic vision”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B64289–297
78.
YoungMJLandyMSMaloneyLT, 1993“A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues”Vision Research332685–2696
79.
YoungsWM, 1976“The influence of perspective and disparity cues on the perception of slant”Vision Research1679–82
