It has been suggested that contour junctions may be used as cues for occlusion. Ecologically, T-junctions and L-junctions are concurrent with situations of occlusion: they arise when the bounding contour of the occluding surface intersects with that of the occluded surface. However, there are other image properties that can be used as cues for occlusion. Here the role of junctions is directly compared with other occlusion cues—specifically, relatability and surface-similarity—in the emergence of amodal completion and illusory contour perception. Stimuli have been constructed that differ only in the junction structure, with the other occlusion cues kept unchanged. L-junctions and T-junctions were eliminated from the image or manipulated so as to be locally inconsistent with the (still valid) global occlusion interpretation. Although the other occlusion cues of relatability and surface similarity still existed in the image, subjects reported not perceiving illusory contours or amodal completion in junction-manipulated images. Junction manipulation also affected the perceived stereoscopic depth and motion of image regions, depending on whether they were perceived to amodally complete with a disjoint region in the image. These results are interpreted in terms of the role of junctions in the processes of surface completion and contour matching. It is proposed that junctions, being a local cue for occlusion, are used to launch completion processes. Other, more global occlusion cues, such as relatability, play a part at a later stage, once completion processes have been launched.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelsonEHAnandanP, 1990“Ordinal characteristics of transparency”, in AAAI Workshop on Qualitative Vision (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 77–80
2.
AlbertMKHoffmanDD, 1995“Genericity in spatial vision”, in Geometric Representations of Perceptual Phenomena: Papers in Honor of Tarow Indow on His 70th Birthday Eds LuceRDD'ZmuraM (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 95–112
3.
AndersonBL, 1997“A theory of illusory lightness and transparency in monocular and binocular images: the role of contour junctions”Perception26419–453
4.
AndersonBLJuleszB, 1995“A theoretical analysis of illusory contour formation in stereopsis”Psychological Review102705–743
5.
BakinJSNakayamaKGilbertCD, 2000“Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations”Journal of Neuroscience208188–8198
6.
BenaryW, 1924“Beobachtungen zu einem Experiment uber Helligkeitskontrast”Psychologische Forschung5131–142
7.
BiedermanI, 1985“Human image understanding: recent research and a theory”Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing3229–73
8.
BraddickOJ, 1974“A short range process in apparent motion”Vision Research14519–527
9.
ChapanisAMcClearyRA, 1953“Interposition as a cue for the perception of relative distance”Journal of General Psychology48113–132
10.
CorenSPoracCTheodorLH, 1987“Set and subjective contour”, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG (New York: Springer) pp 237–245
11.
DavisGDriverJ, 1994“Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system”Nature371791–793
12.
DinnersteinDWertheimerM, 1957“Some determinants of phenomenal overlapping”American Journal of Psychiatry7021–37
13.
FieldDJHayesAHessRF, 1993“Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local association field”Vision Research33173–193
14.
FreemanWT, 1994“The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception”Nature368542–545
15.
GeigerDPaoKRubinN, 1998“Salient and multiple illusory surfaces”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara (Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press) pp 118–124
16.
GellatlyARH, 1980“Perception of an illusory triangle with masked inducing figure”Perception9599–602
17.
GibsonJJ, 1968“What gives rise to the perception of motion?”Psychological Review75335–346
18.
GilbertCDDasAItoMKapadiaMWestheimerG, 1996“Spatial integration and cortical dynamics”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA93615–622
19.
GilbertCDWieselTN, 1983“Clustered intrinsic connections in cat visual cortex”Journal of Neuroscience31116–1133
20.
GregoryRL, 1972“Cognitive contours”Nature23851–52
21.
GrosofDHShapleyRMHawkenMJ, 1993“Macaque V1 neurons can signal ‘illusory’ contours”Nature365550–552
22.
GrossbergSMingollaE, 1985“Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading”Psychological Review92173–211
23.
GurnseyRPoirierFGasconE, 1996“There is no evidence that Kanizsa-type subjective contours can be detected in parallel”Perception25861–874
24.
GuzmanA, 1969“Decomposition of a visual scene into three-dimensional bodies”, in Automatic Interpretation and Classification of Images Ed. GrasselliA (New York: Academic Press) pp 243–276
25.
HeitgerFvon der HeydtR, 1993“A computational model of neural contour processing: figure — ground segregation and illusory contours”, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Visionvolume 4, pp 32–40
26.
von der HeydtRPeterhansEBaumgartnerG, 1984“Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses”Science2241260–1262
27.
HirschJDeLaPazRLRelkinNRVictorJKimKLiTBordenPRubinNShapleyR, 1995“Illusory contours activate specific regions in human visual cortex: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA926469–6473
28.
JuleszB, 1964“Binocular depth perception without familiarity cues”Science145356–362
29.
JuleszB, 1971Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)
30.
KanizsaG, 1955/1987“Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimulazione omogenea”Rivista di Psicologia497–30 [translated in PetrySMeyerG (Eds), 1987The Perception of Illusory Contours (New York: Springer)]
31.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision (New York: Praeger)
32.
KapadiaMKItoMGilbertCDWestheimerG, 1995“Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys”Neuron15843–856
33.
KellmanPShipleyT, 1991“A theory of visual interpolation in object perception”Cognitive Psychology23141–221
34.
KerstenD, 1991“Transparency and the cooperative computation of scene attributes”, in Computational Models of Visual Processing Eds LandyMSMovshonJA (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 209–228
35.
KoenderinkJJ, 1990Solid Shape (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
36.
KoenderinkJJvan DoornAJ, 1976“The singularities of the visual mapping”Biological Cybernetics2451–59
37.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt Brace)
38.
KojoILiinasuoMRovamoJ, 1993“Spatial and temporal properties of illusory figures”Vision Research33897–901
39.
KumaranKGeigerDGurvitsL, 1996“Illusory surface perception and visual organization”Network: Computation in Neural Systems733–60
40.
LundJS, 1988“Anatomical organization of macaque monkey striate visual cortex”Annual Review of Neuroscience11253–288
41.
MalikJ, 1987“Interpreting line drawings of curved objects”International Journal of Computer Vision173–103
42.
MarrD, 1982Vision (New York: W H Freeman)
43.
MendolaJDDaleAMFischlBLiuAKTootellRB, 1999“The representation of illusory and real contours in human cortical visual areas revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging”Journal of Neuroscience198560–8572
44.
MetelliF, 1974“The perception of transparency”Scientific American230(4) 90–98
45.
MichotteA, 1963The Perception of Causality (New York: Basic Books)
46.
MinguzziGF, 1987“Anomalous figures and the tendency to continuation”, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG (New York: Springer) pp 71–75
47.
MumfordDKosslynSMHillgerLAHerrnsteinRJ, 1987“Discriminating figure from ground: the role of edge detection and region growing”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA847354–7358
48.
NakayamaKHeZJShimojoS, 1995“Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision”, in Visual Cognition Eds KosslynSMOshersonDN (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 1–70
49.
NakayamaKShimojoS, 1992“Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces”Science2571357–1363
50.
PeterhansEvon der HeydtR, 1989“Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps”Journal of Neuroscience91749–1763
51.
PeterhansEvon der HeydtR, 1991“Subjective contours—bridging the gap between psychophysics and physiology”Trends in Neurosciences14112–119
52.
PetersonMA, 1994“Object recognition processes can and do operate before figure — ground organization”Current Directions in Psychological Science3105–111
53.
PetersonMA, 1999“What's in a stage name? Comment on Vecera and O'Reilly (1998)”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25276–286
54.
PetersonMAGibsonBS, 1994“Must figure — ground organization precede object recognition? An assumption in peril”Psychological Science5253–259
55.
RatooshP, 1949“On interposition as a cue for the perception of distance”Proceedings of the National of the Academy of Sciences of the USA35257–259
56.
ReynoldsRI, 1981“Perception of an illusory contour as a function of processing time”Perception10107–115
57.
RingachDLShapleyR, 1996“Spatial and temporal properties of illusory contours and amodal boundary completion”Vision Research363037–3050
58.
RockI, 1983The Logic of Perception (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
59.
RockI, 1987“A problem-solving approach to illusory contours”, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG (New York: Springer) pp 62–70
RubinN, 1997“A crucial role for L-junctions and T-junctions in the perception of modal and amodal completion”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science38(4) S991
62.
RubinNBauerEReitzenS, 1999“Scene segmentation occurs in two stages: experimental evidence and a model”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science40(4) S4192
63.
RubinNNakayamaKShapleyR, 1997“Abrupt learning and retinal size specificity in illusory-contour perception”Current Biology7461–467
64.
SaundE, 1999“Perceptual organization of occluding contours of opaque surfaces”, CVIU Special Issue on Perceptual Organization
65.
SharonEBrandtABasriR, 2000“Fast multiscale image segmentation”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, South Carolina (Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press) pp 70–77
66.
ShethBRSharmaJRaoSSurM, 1996“Orientation maps of subjective contours in visual cortex”Science2742110–2115
67.
ShiJMalikJ, 1997“Normalized cuts and image segmentation”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Puerto Rico (Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press) pp 731–737
68.
ShimojoSNakayamaK, 1990“Amodal representation of occluded surfaces: role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence”Perception19285–299
69.
ShimojoSSilvermanGNakayamaK, 1989“Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion”Vision Research29619–626
70.
ShipleyTKellmanP, 1990“The role of discontinuities in the perception of subjective figures”Perception & Psychophysics48259–270
71.
ShomsteinSRubinN, 1998“Searching for an illusory shape: not so fast”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science39(4) S789
72.
SinghMHoffmanD, 1998“Completing visual contours: The relationship between relatability and minimizing inflections”, Preprint MBS 98–04
73.
SugitaY, 1999“Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex”Nature401269–272
74.
TakahashiS, 1991“Operation of figural cues in the microgenetic process of subjective contour perception”Japanese Journal of Psychology62212–215
75.
TsePAlbertM, 1998“Amodal completion in the absence of image tangent discontinuities”Perception27455–464
76.
UllmanS, 1976“Filling-in the gaps: the shape of subjective contours and a model for their generation”Biological Cybernetics251–6
77.
UllmanS, 1995“Sequence seeking and counter streams: A computational model for bidirectional information flow in the visual cortex”Cerebral Cortex51–11
78.
WallachHSlaughterV, 1988“The role of memory in perceiving subjective contours”Perception & Psychophysics43101–106
79.
WilliamsLRJacobsDW, 1997“Stochastic completion fields: a neural model of illusory contour shape and salience”Neural Computation9837–858
80.
WouterloodDBoselieF, 1992“A good continuation model of some occlusion phenomena”Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung54267–277
81.
YenSCFinkelLH, 1998“Extraction of perceptually salient contours by striate cortical networks”Vision Research38719–741
82.
YinCKellmanPJShipleyTF, 1997“Surface completion complements boundary interpolation in the visual integration of partly occluded objects”Perception261459–1479
