Because of the aperture problem, local motion measurements must be combined across space. However, not all motions should be combined. Some arise from distinct objects and should be segregated, and some are due to occlusion and should be discounted because they are spurious. Humans have little difficulty ignoring spurious motions at occlusions and correctly integrating object motion, and are evidently making use of form information to do so. There is a large body of theoretical and empirical evidence supporting the importance of form processes involving junctions in the way motion is integrated. To assess the role of more complex form analysis, we manipulated nonlocal form cues that could be varied independently of local junctions. Using variants on diamond and plaid stimuli used in previous studies, we found that manipulations distant from the junctions themselves could cause large changes in motion interpretation. Nonlocal information often overrides the integration decisions that would be expected from local cues. The mechanisms implicated appear to involve surface segmentation, amodal completion, and depth ordering.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelsonE HMovshonJ A, 1982“Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns”Nature30 0 523–525.
2.
AdelsonE HMovshonJ A, 1983“The perception of coherent motion in two-dimensional patterns”ACM Siggraph and Sigart Interdisciplinary Workshop on Motion: Representation and Perception (New York: Association for Computing Machinery) pp 11–16.
3.
AdelsonE HMovshonJ A, 1984“Binocular disparity and the computation of two-dimensional motion”Journal of the Optical Society of America A11266.
4.
AlaisDvan der SmagtM Jvan den BergA Vvan de GrindW A, 1998“Local and global factors affecting the coherence motion of gratings presented in multiple apertures”Vision Research381581–1591.
5.
AndersonB L, 1997“A theory of illusory lightness and transparency in monocular and binocular images: The role of contour junctions”Perception26419–454.
6.
AndersonB L, 1999“Stereoscopic occlusion and the aperture problem for motion: A New solution”Vision Research391273–1284.
7.
AndersonB LSinhaP, 1997“Reciprocal interactions between occlusion and motion computations”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA943477–3480.
8.
AnstisS, 1990“Imperceptible intersections: The chopstick illusion”, in AI and the Eye Eds BlakeATrościankoT (New York: John Wiley).
9.
ArnheimR, 1954Art and Visual Perception (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
10.
BraddickO, 1993“Segmentation versus integration in visual motion processing”Trends in Neuroscience16263–268.
11.
BressanPGanisGVallortigaraG, 1993“The role of depth stratification in the solution of the aperture problem”Perception22215–228.
12.
CastetEWuergerS, 1997“Perception of moving lines: Interactions between local perpendicular signals and 2D motion signals”Vision Research37705–720.
13.
CastetEChartonVDufourA, 1999“The extrinsic/intrinsic classification of two-dimensional motion signals with barber-pole stimuli”Vision Research39915–932.
14.
DuncanR OAlbrightT DStonerG R, 2000“Occlusion and the interpretation of visual motion: Perceptual and neuronal effects of context”Journal of Neuroscience205885–5897.
15.
KanizsaG, 1981Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception (New York: Praeger).
16.
KellmanPShipleyT, 1991“A theory of visual interpolation in object perception”Cognitive Psychology23141–221.
17.
LidenLMingollaE, 1998“Monocular occlusion cues alter the influence of terminator motion in the barber pole phenomenon”Vision Research38383–3898.
18.
LidenLPackC, 1999“The role of terminators and occlusion cues in motion integration and segmentation: A neural network model”Vision Research393301–3320.
19.
LindseyD TToddJ T, 1996“On the relative contributions of motion energy and transparency to the perception of moving plaids”Vision Research36207–222.
20.
LorenceauJShiffrarM, 1992“The influence of terminators on motion integration across space”Vision Research32263–273.
21.
LorenceauJZagoL, 1999“Cooperative and competitive spatial interactions in motion integration”Visual Neuroscience16755–770.
McDermottJWeissYAdelsonE H, 2000“The computation of occlusion for motion perception”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science41(4) S544.
24.
McDermottJWeissYAdelsonE H, 2001“The role of occlusion in motion interpretation: Insights from occluded crosses” (submitted).
25.
MarrDUllmanS, 1981“Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B211151–180.
26.
MichotteAThinèsGCrabbéG, 1964Les Compléments Amodaux des Structures Perceptives (Louvain: Studia Psychologica, Publications Universitaires de Louvain) [translation into English in A Michotte's Experimental Phenomenology of Perception Eds ThinèsGCostallAButterworthG (1991; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)].
27.
NakayamaKSilvermanG H, 1988“The aperture problem—II: Spatial integration of information along contours”Vision Research28747–753.
28.
NakayamaK.HeZShimojoS, 1995“Visual surface representation: A Critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision”, in Visual Cognition Eds KosslynS MOshersonD N (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 1–70.
29.
NowlanSSejnowskiT, 1995“A selection model for motion processing in area MT of primates”Journal of Neuroscience151195–1214.
30.
RubinN, 2001“The role of junctions in surface completion and contour matching”Perception30339–366.
31.
ShiffrarMLiXLorenceauJ, 1995“Motion integration across differing image features”Vision Research352137–2146.
32.
ShiffrarMLorenceauJ, 1996“Increased motion linking across edges with decreased luminance contrast, edge width and duration”Vision Research362061–2067.
33.
ShimojoSSilvermanG HNakayamaK, 1989“Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion”Vision Research29619–626.
34.
ShipleyT FKellmanP J, 1992“Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length”Perception & Psychophysics5297–106.
35.
StonerG RAlbrightT D, 1992“Neural correlates of perceptual motion coherence”Nature358412–414.
36.
StonerG RAlbrightT D, 1996“The interpretation of visual motion: Evidence for surface segmentation mechanisms”Vision Research361291–1310.
37.
StonerG RAlbrightT D, 1998“Luminance contrast affects motion coherency in plaid patterns by acting as a depth-from-occlusion cue”Vision Research38387–401.
38.
StonerG RAlbrightT DRamachandranV S, 1990“Transparency and coherence in human motion perception”Nature344153–155.
39.
TommasiLVallortigaraG, 1999“Figure–ground segregation modulates perceived direction of ambiguous moving gratings and plaids”Vision Research39777–787.
40.
TrueswellJ CHayhoeM M, 1993“Surface segmentation mechanisms and motion perception”Vision Research33313–328.
41.
VallortigaraGBressanP, 1991“Occlusion and the perception of coherent motion”Vision Research311967–1978.
42.
WallachH, 1935“Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungrichtung”Psychologische Forschung20325–380 [see also Wuerger et al (1996)].
43.
WeissYAdelsonE H, 2000“Adventures with gelatinous ellipses: Constraints on models of human motion analysis”Perception29543–566.
44.
WuergerSShapleyRRubinN, 1996“On the visually perceived direction of motion by Hans Wallach: 60 years later”Perception251317–1367.
45.
ZaidiQSpeharBShyM, 1997“Induced effects of backgrounds and foregrounds in threedimensional configurations: The role of T-junctions”Perception26395–408.
