D'Angiulli et al (1998 Scandinavian Journal of Psychology39 187–190) found blind and sighted (blindfolded) children identified common objects in raised-outline drawings explored haptically, and corrected themselves without feedback. The self-correction suggests that participants can assess the extent to which the referents they suggest as possible identifications fit the haptic pictures. Indeed, when we asked subjects to identify haptic pictures, and to judge how well the referents they mentioned fitted the pictures, their fit judgments predicted the accuracy of their suggestions. Also, when one group of subjects offered the suggestions and another group assessed the fit of the suggestions to the pictures, the fit judgments predicted the accuracy of the suggestions. Further, good fit predicted successful recognition memory. In addition, both high and low fit judgments were made confidently, so the range of confidence judgments was smaller than the range of fit judgments. Finally, visual judgments of fit by one group predicted the level of success of the suggestions from another (haptic) group. In sum, subjects assess their suggested identifications appropriately, most likely on the basis of object shape criteria, outlined surface edges, and use of a vantage point.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnheimR, 1990“Perceptual aspects of art for the blind”Journal of Aesthetic Education2457–65
2.
AttneaveFBensonB, 1969“Spatial coding of tactual information”American Journal of Psychology81216–222
3.
D'AngiulliAKennedyJ M, 2000“Guided exploration enhances tactile pictorial recognition in blindfolded sighted children”International Journal of Rehabilitation Research23319–320
4.
D'AngiulliAKennedyJ M, 2001“Children's tactual exploration and copying without vision”International Journal of Rehabilitation Research24233–234
5.
D'AngiulliAKennedyJ MHellerM A, 1998“Blind children recognizing tactile pictures respond like sighted children given guidance in exploration”Scandinavian Journal of Psychology39187–190
6.
ErikssonY, 1998Tactile Pictures: Pictorial Representations for the Blind 1784–1940 (Gothenburg: Gothenburg University Press)
7.
GibsonE, 1969Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts)
8.
HellerM A, 1989“Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and the blind: The advantage of the late blind”Perception18379–389
9.
HellerM A (Ed.), 2000Touch, Representation, and Blindness (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
10.
HellerM ACalcaterraJ AGreenS LBrownL, 1999“Intersensory conflict between vision and touch: The response modality dominates when precise, attention-riveting judgments are required”Perception & Psychophysics611384–1398
11.
HellerM AKennedyJ MJoynerT, 1995“Production and interpretation of pictures of houses by blind people”Perception241049–1058
12.
HolmesEHughesBJanssonG, 1998“Haptic perception of texture gradients”Perception27993–1008
13.
HopkinsR, 2000“Touching pictures”British Journal of Aesthetics40149–167
14.
JanssonGHolmesE, in press, “Can we read depth in tactile pictures? Potentials suggested by research in tactile perception”, in Art Education for the Blind Teachers' Resource Guide Eds AxelELevantN (Art Education for the Blind, New York, in cooperation with American Printing House for the Blind, Louisville, KY) pp 146–156
15.
KatzD, 1946/1991“How do blind people draw?”, translated by VedelerDCostallA [original work published in KatzD, 1946Hur tecknar blinda? Nya psykologiska stroevtag (Stockholm: Kooperativa Foerbundets Bokfoerlag)]
16.
KennedyJ M, 1974A Psychology of Picture Perception (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass)
17.
KennedyJ M, 1993Drawing and the Blind (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press)
18.
KennedyJ M, 1997“How the blind draw”Scientific American276 (January) 60–65
19.
KennedyJ M, 2000“Recognizing outline pictures via touch: Alignment theory”, in Touch, Representation, and Blindness Ed. HellerM A (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 67–98
20.
KennedyJ M, in press “Touch and the observer's vantage point”, in Unfolding Perceptual Continua Ed. AlbertazziL (Amsterdam: Benjamins) pp 181–204
21.
KennedyJ MMerkasC, 2000“Depictions of motion devised by a blind person”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review7700–706
22.
LedermanS JKlatzkyR LChatawayCSummersC, 1990“Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects”Perception & Psychophysics4754–64
23.
LopesD M M, 1997“Art media and the sense modalities: Tactile pictures”Philosophical Quarterly47425–440
24.
MillarS, 1994Understanding and Representing Space: Theory and Evidence from Studies with Blind and Sighted Children (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
25.
MillarS, 2000“Modality and mind: Convergent active processing in interrelated networks as a model of development and perception by touch”, in Touch, Representation, and Blindness Ed. HellerM A (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 99–141
26.
PathakKPringL, 1989“Tactual picture recognition in congenitally blind and sighted children”Applied Cognitive Psychology3337–350
27.
PringLWalkerJ, 1993“Degree of accuracy in perceiving graphic and pictorial information by touch”International Journal of Rehabilitation Research16221–233
28.
RichardsonBSymmonsMKennedyJ M, 1998“Findings with the tactile display system”, poster presented at the Conference on Representation and Blindness, San Marino, May
29.
ShimizuYSaidaSShimuraH, 1993“Tactile pattern recognition by graphic display: Importance of 3-D information for haptic perception of familiar objects”Perception & Psychophysics5343–48
