Stimuli were presented that consisted of a stationary row of black-bordered white rectangles. As observers watched, each rectangle in turn from left to right changed from white to black. The final rectangle did not change colour but moved off from left to right. The sequential colour change suggested motion from left to right, and observers reliably reported a visual impression that this illusory motion kicked or bumped the last rectangle, thereby making it move. The impression was stronger when the sequential colour change was faster, but was not significantly affected by the number of the rectangles in the row (ranging from 2 to 8). These results support the conclusion that neither contact nor motion of a causal object is necessary for a visual impression of causality to occur.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeasleyN E, 1968“The extent of individual differences in the perception of causality”Canadian Journal of Psychology22399–407
2.
BlytheP WToddP MMillerG F, 1999“How motion reveals intention: categorizing social interactions”, in Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart Eds GigerenzerGToddP M the ABC Research Group (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 257–285
3.
BoyleD G, 1960“A contribution to the study of phenomenal causality”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology12171–179
4.
BoyleD G, 1975“A new technique for studying phenomenal causality”British Journal of Psychology66383–385
5.
CostallA, 1991“Phenomenal causality”, in Michotte's Experimental Phenomenology of Perception Eds ThinèsGCostallAButterworthG (Hove, East Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 51–64
6.
DittrichW HLeaS E G, 1994“Visual perception of intentional motion”Perception23253–268
7.
GemelliACappelliniA, 1958“The influence of the subject's attitude in perception”Acta Psychologica1412–23
8.
GordonI EDayR HStecherE J, 1990“Perceived causality occurs with stroboscopic movement of one or both stimulus elements”Perception1917–20
9.
HeiderFSimmelM, 1944“An experimental study of apparent behavior”American Journal of Psychology57243–259
10.
HochbergJBrooksV, 1996“The perception of motion pictures”, in Cognitive Ecology Eds FriedmanM PCarteretteE C (London: Academic Press) pp 205–292
11.
LeslieA M, 1982“The perception of causality in infants”Perception11173–186
12.
LeslieA M, 1984“Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants”Perception13287–305
MichotteA, 1946La Perception de la Causalité (Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie)
15.
MichotteA, 1963The Perception of Causality (New York: Basic Books)
16.
MichotteAThinèsG, 1991“Perceived causality”, in Michotte's Experimental Phenomenology of Perception Eds ThinèsGCostallAButterworthG (Hove, East Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 66–87
17.
NatsoulasT, 1961“Principles of momentum and kinetic energy in the perception of causality”American Journal of Psychology74394–402
18.
PoweslandP F, 1959“The effect of practice upon the perception of causality”Canadian Journal of Psychology13155–168
19.
RunesonS, 1983“On visual perception of dynamic events”Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Psychologica Upsaliensia91–56
20.
RunesonSFrykholmG, 1981“Visual perception and lifted weight”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance7733–740
21.
RunesonSJuslinPOlssonH, 2000“Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence”Psychological Review107525–555
22.
RunesonSVedelerD, 1993“The indispensability of precollision kinematics in the visual perception of relative mass”Perception & Psychophysics53617–632
23.
SchlottmannA, 2000“Is perception of causality modular?”Trends in Cognitive Sciences4441–442
24.
SchlottmannAShanksD R, 1992“Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A44321–342
25.
SchollB JTremouletP D, 2000“Perceptual causality and animacy”Trends in Cognitive Sciences4299–309
26.
ToddJ TWarrenW H, 1982“Visual perception of relative mass in dynamic events”Perception11325–335
27.
TremouletP DFeldmanJ, 2000“Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object”Perception29943–951
28.
WhiteP A, 1988“Causal processing: origins and development”Psychological Bulletin10436–52
29.
WhiteP A, 1995The Understanding of Causation and the Production of Action: From Infancy to Adulthood (Hove, East Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
30.
WhiteP AMilneA, 1997“Phenomenal causality: impressions of pulling in the visual perception of objects in motion”American Journal of Psychology110573–602
31.
WhiteP AMilneA, 1999“Impressions of enforced disintegration and bursting in the visual perception of collision events”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General128499–516
32.
YelaM, 1952“Phenomenal causation at a distance”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology4139–154
