Expertise in face processing takes many years to develop. To determine the contribution of different face-processing skills to this slow development, we altered a single face so as to create sets of faces designed to measure featural, configural, and contour processing. Within each set, faces differed only in the shape of the eyes and mouth (featural set), only in the spacing of the eyes and mouth (spacing set), or only in the shape of the external contour (contour set). We presented adults, and children aged 6, 8, and 10 years, with pairs of upright and inverted faces and instructed them to indicate whether the two faces were the same or different. Adults showed a larger inversion effect for the spacing set than for the featural and external contour sets, confirming that the spacing set taps configural processing. On the spacing set, all groups of children made more errors than adults. In contrast, on the external contour and featural sets, children at all ages were almost as accurate as adults, with no significant difference beginning at age 6 on the external contour set and beginning at age 10 on the featural set. Overall, the results indicate that adult expertise in configural processing is especially slow to develop.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaenningerM, 1994“The development of face recognition: Featural or configurational processing?”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology57377–396
2.
BahrickH PBahrickP OWittlingerR P, 1975“Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General10454–75
3.
BraceN AHoleG JKempR IPikeG EVan DuurenMNorgateL, 2001“Developmental changes in the effect of inversion: Using a picture book to investigate face recognition”Perception3085–94
4.
BruceVCampbellR NDoherty-SneddonGImportALangtonSMcAuleySWrightR, 2000“Testing face processing skills in children”British Journal of Developmental Psychology18319–333
5.
BruceVYoungA W, 1998In the Eye of the Beholder: The Science of Face Perception (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
6.
BushnellISaiFMullenJ, 1989“Neonatal recognition of the mother's face”British Journal of Developmental Psychology73–15
7.
CampbellRTuckM, 1995“Recognition of parts of famous-face photographs by children: an experimental note”Perception24451–456
8.
CampbellRWalkerJBaron-CohenS, 1995“The development of differential use of inner and outer face features in familiar face identification”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology59196–210
9.
CareySDiamondR, 1977“From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces”Science195213–313
10.
CareySDiamondR, 1994“Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?”Visual Cognition1253–274
11.
CareySDiamondRWoodsB, 1980“Development of face recognition: A maturational component?”Developmental Psychology16257–269
12.
CashonCCohenL, 2001“Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations?”Infant and Child Development1083–92
13.
CollishawS MHoleG J, 2000“Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity”Perception29893–909
14.
DeruelleCde SchonenS, 1998“Do the right and left hemispheres attend to the same visuospatial information within a face in infancy?”Developmental Neuropsychology14535–554
15.
DiamondRCareyS, 1986“Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115107–117
16.
EllisH DShepherdJ WDaviesG M, 1979“Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition”Perception8431–439
17.
FarkasL G, 1981Anthropometry of the Head and Face in Medicine (New York: Elsevier)
18.
FreireALeeK, 2001“Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: Processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology80347–371
19.
FreireALeeKSymonsL A, 2000“The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence”Perception29159–170
20.
GauthierISkudlarskiPGoreJ CAndersonA W, 2000“Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition”Nature Neuroscience3191–197
21.
GauthierITarrM J, 1997“Becoming a ‘greeble’ expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition”Vision Research371673–1682
22.
GauthierITarrM JAndersonA WSkudlarskiPGoreJ C, 1999“Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects”Nature Neuroscience2568–573
23.
GauthierIWilliamsPTarrM JTanakaJ, 1998“Training ‘greeble’ experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes”Vision Research382401–2428
24.
GeldartS, 2000Experiential Influences on the Development of Face Perception unpublished PhD thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
25.
GorenCSartyMWuP, 1975“Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants”Pediatrics56544–549
26.
HoleG J, 1994“Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces”Perception2365–74
27.
JohnsonM HDziurawiecSEllisH DMortonJ, 1991“Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline”Cognition401–19
28.
Le GrandRMondlochC JMaurerDBrentH P, 2001“Early visual experience and face processing”Nature410890
29.
LederHBruceV, 2000“When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A53513–536
30.
MondlochC JLewisT LBudreauD RMaurerDDannemillerJ LStephensB RKleiner-GathercoalK A, 1999“Face perception during early infancy”Psychological Science10419–422
31.
MurrayJYongERhodesG, 2000“Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces”Psychological Science11492–496
32.
PascalisOde SchonenSMortonJDeruelleCFabre-GrenetM, 1995“Mother's face recognition by neonates: A replication and an extension”Infant Behavior and Development1879–85
33.
PetersM, 1988“Description and validation of a flexible and broadly usable handedness questionnaire”Laterality377–96
34.
RhodesGBrakeSAtkinsonA P, 1993“What's lost in inverted faces?”Cognition4725–57
35.
SimionFMacchi CassiaVTuratiCValenzaE, 2001“The origins of face perception: Specific versus non-specific mechanisms”Infant and Child Development1059–65
36.
SlaterABremnerGJohnsonS PSherwoodPHayesRBrownE, 2000“Newborn infants' preference for attractive faces: The role of internal and external facial features”Infancy1265–274
37.
SlaterAvon der SchulenburgCBrownEBadenochMButterworthGParsonsSSamuelsC, 1998“Newborn infants prefer attractive faces”Infant Behavior and Development21345–354
38.
SchwarzerG, 2000“Development of face processing: the effect of face inversion”Child Development71391–401
39.
TanakaJ WFarahM J, 1993“Parts and wholes in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A46225–245
40.
TanakaJ WGauthierI, 1997“Expertise in object and face perception”, in Psychology of Learning and Motivation volume 36, Eds GoldstoneRSchynsPMedinD (San Diego, CA: Academic Press) pp 83–125
41.
TanakaJ WKayJ BGrinnellEStansfieldBSzechterL, 1998“Face recognition in young children: When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts”Visual Cognition5479–496
42.
ValenzaESimionFMacchi CassiaVUmiltàC, 1996“Face preference at birth”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22892–903
43.
YinR K, 1969“Looking at upside-down faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology81141–145
44.
YoungA WHellawellDHayD C, 1987“Configurational information in face perception”Perception16747–759
