Jacopo Chimenti (c 1551–1640), an artist from Empoli, made two sketches of a young man holding a compass and a plumb line. When these were seen, mounted next to one another, by Alexander Crum Brown in 1859, he combined them by overconvergence and described the stereoscopic depth he saw. Brown's informal observation was conveyed to David Brewster, who suggested that the drawings were produced for a stereoscope, possibly made by Giovanni Battista della Porta. There followed a bitter debate about the supposed stereoscopic effects that could be seen when the pictures combined. Brewster's claims were finally dispelled when precise measurements were made of the drawings: some parts were stereoscopic and others were pseudoscopic. Brewster's attempts to wrest the invention of the stereoscope from Wheatstone were unsuccessful.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anon, 1852“Binocular vision and the stereoscope”The North British Review17165–204 (David Brewster).
2.
Athenœum1838“Prof. Wheatstone read a paper On binocular vision; and on the stereoscope, an instrument for illustrating its phenomena’” 8 September, page 650.
3.
BrewsterD., 1830“Optics”, in Edinburgh Encyclopediavolume 15 (Edinburgh: Blackwoods) pp 460–662.
4.
BrewsterD., 1844“On the law of visible position in single and binocular vision, and on the representation of solid figures by the union of dissimilar plane pictures on the retina”Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh15349–368.
5.
BrewsterD., 1856The Stereoscope. Its History Theory, and Construction (London: Murray).
6.
BrewsterD., 1860a“Letter to J D Forbes” Forbes papers, msdep 7/29 (St Andrews University Library).
7.
BrewsterD., 1860b“Notice respecting the invention of the stereoscope in the sixteenth century, and of binocular drawings, by Jacopo Chimenti da Empoli, a Florentine artist”The Photographic Journal6232–233.
8.
BrewsterD., 1860c“Stereoscope”, in Encyclopœdia Britannica8th edition, volume 20 (Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black) pp 684–691.
9.
BrewsterD., 1862“On the stereoscopic pictures executed in the 16th century”The Photographic Journal89–12.
10.
BrewsterD., 1864“On the stereoscopic relief in the Chimenti pictures”The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science271–3.
11.
BrownA C, 1860“Letter to J D Forbes” Forbes papers, msdep 7/25 a & b (St Andrews University Library).
12.
BrownA C, 1874“Preliminary note on the sense of rotation and the function of the semicircular canals of the internal ear”Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh8255–257.
13.
BrownA C, 1875“On the sense of rotation and the anatomy and physiology of the semicircular canals of the internal ear”Journal of Anatomy and Physiology8327–331.
14.
EmersonE., 1862“On the perception of relief”American Journal of Science and Arts34312–316.
15.
EmersonE., 1863“On the perception of relief”The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science26125–130.
16.
EmersonE., 1864a“The Chimenti pictures: A reply to Sir David Brewster”British Journal of Photography11111–112.
17.
EmersonE., 1864b, idem, No. II British Journal of Photography11132–133.
18.
EmersonE., 1864c, idem, No. III British Journal of Photography11167–169.
19.
EmersonE., 1864d, idem, No. IV British Journal of Photography11202–204.
20.
FayeM., 1856“Sur un nouveau système de stéréoscope”Cosmos9374–375.
21.
FechnerG T, 1860Elemente der Psychophysik (Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel).
HarrisJ., 1775A Treatise of Optics: Containing Elements of the Science; in Two Books (London: White).
24.
HelmholtzH., 2000Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Opticsvolume 3 translated by SouthallJ P C, (Bristol: Thoemmes).
25.
HowardI PWadeN J, 1996“Ptolemy's contributions to the geometry of binocular vision”Perception251189–1202.
26.
JW (James Walker), 1923“Alexander Crum Brown”Journal of the Chemical Society1233422–3431.
27.
KnottC G, 1911Life and Scientific Work of Peter Guthrie Tait (Cambridge: The University Press).
28.
LacanE., 1860“Foreign correspondence”British Journal of Photography7228–229.
29.
LandonC P, 1805Galerie historique des hommes les plus célèbres de tous les siècles et de toutes les Nations (Paris: Jolly).
30.
Le ClercS., 1679Discours Touchant le Point de Veue, dans lequel il est prouvé que les choses qu'on voit distinctement, ne sont veues que d'un oeil (Paris: Jolly).
31.
MayM T, 1968Galen. On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
32.
PortaJ B, 1589Magiae Naturalis Libri XX (Naples: Salviani).
33.
PortaJ B, 1593De Refractione. Optices Parte. Libri Novem (Naples: Salviani).
SabraA I, (translator and editor), 1989The Optics of Ibn Al-Haytham. Books I–III. On Direct Vision (London: The Warburg Institute).
36.
ShadboltG., 1860“Editorial”British Journal of Photography7231–232.
37.
ShairpJ CTaitP GAdams-ReillyA., 1873Life and Letters of James David Forbes, F.R.S. (London: Macmillan).
38.
SmithA M, 1996Ptolemy's Theory of Visual Perception: An English Translation of the Optics with Introduction and Commentary (Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society).
39.
SmithA M, 1998“Ptolemy, Alhazen, and Kepler and the problem of optical images”Arabic Sciences and Philosophy89–44.
40.
SmithR., 1738A Compleat System of Opticks in Four Books (Cambridge: Published by the author).
41.
TaitP G, 1862“The drawings of Jacopo Chimenti”The Photographic Journal869.
42.
TestaferrataE., 1996“Jacopo da Empoli”, in The Dictionary of Artvolume 10, Ed. TurnerJ. (London: Macmillan) pp 187–190.
43.
ThomsonW.TaitP G, 1867A Treatise on Natural Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon).
44.
WadeN J, 1983Brewster and Wheatstone on Vision (London: Academic Press).
45.
WadeN J, 1987“On the late invention of the stereoscope”Perception16785–818.
46.
WadeN J, 1996“Descriptions of visual phenomena from Aristotle to Wheatstone”Perception251137–1175.
47.
WadeN J, 1998aA Natural History of Vision (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
48.
WadeN J, 1998b“Early studies of eye dominances”Laterality397–109.
WadeN JSwanstonM T, 2001“Helmholtz on golf”Perception301407–1410.
51.
WheatstoneC., 1838“Contributions to the physiology of vision—Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society128371–394.
