Phenomenal transparency reflects a process which makes it possible to recover the structure and lightness of overlapping objects from a fragmented image. This process was investigated by the visual-search paradigm. In three experiments, observers searched for a target that consisted of gray patches among a variable number of distractors and the search efficiency was assessed. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that the search efficiency was greatly improved when the target was distinctive with regard to structure, based on transparency. Experiment 3 showed that the search efficiency was impaired when a target was not distinctive with regard to lightness (ie perceived reflectance), based on transparency. These results suggest that the shape and reflectance of overlapping objects when accompanied by transparency can be calculated in parallel across the visual field, and can be used as a guide for visual attention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelsonE H, 1993“Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness”Science2622042–2044
2.
AndersonB L, 1997“A theory of illusory lightness and transparency in monocular and binocular images: the role of contour junctions”Perception26419–453
3.
BeckJIvryR, 1988“On the role of figural organization in perceptual transparency”Perception & Psychophysics44585–594
4.
BeckJPrazdnyKIvryR, 1984“The perception of transparency with achromatic colors”Perception & Psychophysics35407–422
5.
ChealM LLyonD, 1989“Attention effects on form discrimination at different eccentricities”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology41719–746
CohenJMacWhinneyBFlattMProvostJ, 1993“PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers25257–271
8.
DavisGDriverJ, 1998“Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24169–184
9.
DuncanJHumphreysG W, 1989“Visual search and stimulus similarity”Psychological Review96433–458
10.
EnnsJ TRensinkR A, 1990“Influence of scene-based properties on visual search”Science247721–723
11.
EnnsJ TRensinkR A, 1991“Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings”Psychological Review98335–351
12.
GilchristAKossyfidisCBonatoFAgostiniTCataliottiJLiXSpeharBAnnanVEconomouE, 1999“An anchoring theory of lightness perception”Psychological Review106795–834
13.
GilchristI DHumphreysG WRiddochMNeumannH, 1997“Luminance and edge information in grouping: A study using visual search”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23464–480
14.
HeZ JNakayamaK, 1992“Surfaces versus features in visual search”Nature359231–233
15.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision (New York: Praeger)
16.
KerstenD, 1991“Transparency and the cooperative computation of scene attributes”, in Computational Models of Visual Processing Eds LandyM SMovshonJ A (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 209–228
17.
KingdomF A ABlakesleeBMcCourtM E, 1997“Brightness with and without perceived transparency: When does it make a difference?”Perception26493–506
18.
MackARockI, 1998Inattentional Blindness (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
19.
MarrD, 1982Vision (New York: W H Freeman)
20.
MetelliF, 1974“The perception of transparency”Scientific American230(4) 90–98
21.
MetelliFDa PosOCavedonA, 1985“Balanced and unbalanced, complete and partial transparency”Perception & Psychophysics38354–366
22.
MooreC MBrownL E, 2001“Preconstancy information can influence visual search: The case of lightness constancy”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27178–194
23.
NakayamaKShimojoSRamachandranV S, 1990“Transparency: relation to depth, subjective contours, luminance, and neon color spreading”Perception19497–513
24.
NoguchiKMotokiM, 1972“Illuminance as a determinant of apparent transparency”Japanese Psychological Research14204–208
25.
RensinkR AEnnsJ T, 1995“Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping”Psychological Review102101–130
26.
RensinkR AEnnsJ T, 1998“Early completion of occluded objects”Vision Research382489–2505
27.
SunJPeronaP, 1996“Early computation of shape and reflectance in the visual system”Nature379165–168
28.
TreismanAGeladeG, 1980“A feature integration theory of attention”Cognitive Psychology1297–136
29.
TreismanAGormicanS, 1988“Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries”Psychological Review9515–48
30.
WatanabeTCavanaghP, 1992“The role of transparency in perceptual grouping and pattern recognition”Perception21133–139
31.
WatanabeTCavanaghP, 1993“Surface decomposition accompanying the perception of transparency”Spatial Vision795–111
32.
WertheimerM, 1938“Laws of organization in perceptual forms”, in A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology Ed. EllisW D (London: Kegan Paul) pp 71–88
33.
WolfeJ M, 1994“Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review1202–238
WolfeJ MYuK PStewartM IShorterA DFriedman-HillS RCaveK R, 1990“Limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: Color x color and orientation x orientation conjunctions”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16879–892
