Watson and Humphreys (1997 Psychological Review104 90 – 122) showed that when searching for a target, observers can ignore a previewed set of distractors (other items), effectively decreasing the number of relevant items in a difficult search display and thus speeding performance (‘visual marking’). Other researchers have more recently investigated visual marking for continuously moving items, finding that shared features, and preserved inter-item spatial relationships, are helpful. Here, we tested whether visual marking occurs for a set of initial items that moves in one discrete jump (preserving shared features and inter-item spatial relationships). Marking did not occur in these displays, and we interpret this result in the context of previous research on visual marking.
ChunM MWolfeJ M, 1996“Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?”Cognitive Psychology3039 – 78.
3.
GibsonB SJiangY., 2001“Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search”Perception & Psychophysics6359 – 73.
4.
JiangY.ChunM MMarksL E, 2002“Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance28717 – 730.
5.
KleinR., 1988“Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search”Nature334430 – 431.
6.
NakayamaK.JosephJ S, 1998“Attention, pattern recognition, and pop-out in visual search”, in The Attentive Brain Ed. ParasuramanR. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 279–298.
7.
OldsE SCowanW BJolicoeurP., 1999“Effective color CRT calibration techniques for perception research”Journal of the Optical Society of America A161501 – 1505.
8.
OldsE SCowanW BJolicoeurP., 2000a“Tracking visual search over space and time”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review7292 – 300.
OldsE SDeganiM D, 2002“Does partial difficult search help difficult search?”Perception & Psychophysics (in press).
11.
OliversC N LWatsonD GHumphreysG W, 1999“Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A52679 – 715.
12.
PalmerS E, 1999Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
13.
TheeuwesJ.KramerA FAtchleyP., 1998“Visual marking of old objects”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review5130 – 134.
14.
TreismanA MGeladeG., 1980“A feature-integration theory of attention”Cognitive Psychology1297 – 136.
15.
WatsonD G, 2001“Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary”Perception & Psychophysics6374 – 84.
16.
WatsonD GHumphreysG W, 1997“Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top – down attentional inhibition of old objects”Psychological Review10490 – 122.
17.
WatsonD GHumphreysG W, 1998“Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top – down feature-based inhibition in selection”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24946 – 962.
18.
WatsonD GHumphreysG W, 2000“Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm”Perception & Psychophysics62471 – 481.
19.
WolfeJ M, 1994“Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review1202–238.
