The perception of luminosity is thought to depend upon the intensity of the stimulus: a surface begins to appear self-luminous when it emits or reflects a certain amount of light. This is known as the luminosity threshold. It is a common opinion among vision scientists that such a threshold is correlated to the intensity of a perceptually white surface, in the sense that only an area of the visual field with luminance higher than perceived surface-white will appear luminous. Here we show grey colours that appear luminous in virtue of surrounding luminance ramps. These ramps are intended to mimic halos seen around light sources in natural environments. The results of three experiments indicate that the phenomenon is in direct contradiction to the aforementioned assumptions and suggest the existence of separate perceptual pathways for self-luminosity perception and for surface-colour perception.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgostiniTGalmonteA, 2002“A new effect of luminance gradient on achromatic simultaneous contrast”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review9264–269
2.
BartelsAZekiS, 2000“The architecture of the colour centre in the human visual brain: New results and a review”European Journal Neuroscience12172–193
3.
BeckmanCNilssonOPaulssonL-E, 1994“Intraocular scattering in vision, artistic painting, and photography”Applied Optics334749–4753
4.
BettelheimF APaunovicM, 1979“Light scattering of normal human lens”Biophysical Journal2685–99
5.
BonatoFCataliottiJ, 2000“The effects of figure/ground, perceived area, and target saliency on the luminosity threshold”Perception & Psychophysics62341–349
6.
BonatoFGilchristA L, 1994“The perception of luminosity on different backgrounds and in different illuminations”Perception23991–1006
7.
BonatoFGilchristA L, 1999“Perceived area and the luminosity threshold”Perception & Psychophysics61786–797
8.
EvansR M, 1974The Perception of Color (New York: John Wiley)
9.
GilchristA LKossifydisCBonatoFAgostiniTCataliottiJLiXSpeharBAnnanVEconomouE, 1999“An anchoring theory of lightness perception”Psychological Review106795–834
10.
HeringE, 1879/1942Spatial Sense and Movements of the Eye translation by RaddeC A (Baltimore, MD: American Academy of Optometry, 1942) of “Der Raumsinn und die Bewegung des Auges”, inHandbuch der Physiologie Ed. HermannL, volume 3, part 1 (Leipzig: Vogel, 1879)
11.
KatzD, 1935The World of Colour (London: Kegan Paul)
12.
KennedyJ M, 1976“Sun figure: An illusory diffuse contour resulting from an arrangement of dots”Perception5479–481
13.
LeonardsUIbanezVZavagnoDSeghierMTrosciankoT, 2003“A cortical region for luminosity perception—An fMRI study”Journal of Vision3425a; http://journalofvision.org/3/9/425
LuHZavagnoDLiuZ, submitted “The flare effect does not give rise to a longer lasting afterimage”Perception
16.
McCourtM, 1982“A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect”Vision Research22119–134
17.
RossiA FRittenhouseC DParadisoM A, 1996“The representation of brightness in the primary visual cortex”Science2731104–1107
18.
SchlickC, 1994“Quantization techniques for visualization of high dynamic range images”, in Photorealistic Rendering Techniques: Proceedings of the Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Eds Georgios SakasP SMullerS (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer) pp 7–18
19.
SimpsonG, 1953“Ocular halos and coronas”British Journal of Ophthalmology37450–486
20.
SpencerGShirleyPZimmermanKGreenbergD P, 1995“Physically-based glare effects for digital images”, in Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Eds MeirS GCookR (New York: ACM Press) pp 325–334
21.
UllmanS, 1976“On visual detection of light sources”Biological Cybernetics21205–212
22.
WallachH, 1948“Brightness constancy and the nature of achromatic colours”Journal of Experimental Psychology38315–336
23.
WittgensteinL, 1977Remarks on Colour (Oxford: Blackwell)
24.
YamauchiYUchikawaK, 1998“Effects of non-uniform illumination on the mode of colour appearance”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science39S157
25.
ZavagnoD, 1999“Phenomenal glare, black holes and other gradient effects”, in Research in Perception. Proceedings of the Meeting in Memory of Fabio Metelli Eds ZanforlinMTommasiL (Padua: Logos) pp 303–306
26.
ZavagnoD, 2001“Playing with luminance gradients: A phenomenological overview”Perception30Supplement, 19
27.
ZavagnoD, 2002“Immagini di luce: Dal sole all'aureola”, in La Mente Allo Specchio. Ricerche di Psicologia per l'Arte Eds ZanuttiniLZavagnoD (Udine: Forum) pp 29–51
28.
ZavagnoDAnnanVCaputoG, 2004“The problem of being white: Testing the highest luminance rule”Vision16149–159
29.
ZavagnoDCaputoG, 1997“Luminosity thresholds in induced luminosity displays”, in Fechner Day 97, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics Eds PreisAHornowskiT (Poznan, Poland: International Society for Psychophysics) pp 321–326
30.
ZavagnoDCaputoG, 2001“The glare effect and the perception of luminosity”Perception30209–222
31.
ZavagnoDMassironiM, 1997“La rappresentazione della luce nelle opere d'arte grafica”Giornale Italiano di Psicologia24135–187
