We used two-frame apparent motion in a three-dimensional virtual environment to test whether observers had biases to experience approaching or receding motion in depth. Observers viewed a tunnel of tiles receding in depth, that moved ambiguously either toward or away from them. We found that observers exhibited biases to experience approaching motion. The strengths of the biases were decreased when stimuli pointed away, but size of the display screen had no effect. Tests with diamond-shaped tiles that varied in the degree of pointing asymmetry resulted in a linear trend in which the bias was strongest for stimuli pointing toward the viewer, and weakest for stimuli pointing away. We show that the overall bias to experience approaching motion is consi'stent with a computational strategy of matching corresponding features between adjacent foreshortened stimuli in consecutive visual frames. We conclude that there are both adaptational and geometric reasons to favor the experience of approaching motion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AddieJ, 2003Spatial Multi-sensory Interaction: Auditory Capture of Visual Apparent Motion Master's thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
2.
AndersonK CSiegelR M, 1999“Optic flow selectivity in the anterior superior temporal poly-sensory area, STPa, of the behaving monkey”Journal of Neuroscience192681–2692.
3.
AttneaveF, 1971“Multistability in perception”Scientific American225(6) 63–71.
GeorgesonM AHarrisM G, 1978“Apparent foveofugal drift of counterphase gratings”Perception7527–536.
12.
GrayRReganD M, 1999“Adapting to expansion increases perceived time to collision”Vision Research393602–3607.
13.
GrayRReganD M, 2000“Risky driving behavior: A consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance261721–1732.
14.
von HelmholtzH, 1867/1962Treatise on Physiological Opticsvolume 3 (1962, New York: Dover); English translation by SouthallJ P C, for the Optical Society of America (1925) from the 3rd German edition of Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (first published in 1867, Leipzig: Voss).
JohanssonG, 1978“Visual event perception”, in Handbook of Sensory Physiology VIII Perception Eds HeldRLeibowitzHTeuberH-L, (Berlin: Springer) pp 675–711.
17.
KaiserM KMontegutM J, 1997“Of red planets and indigo computers: Mars database visualization as an example of platform downsizing”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers2948–53.
18.
KerstenD, 1997“Inverse 3-D graphics: A metaphor for visual perception”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers2937–46.
19.
LeeD NReddishP E, 1981“Plummeting gannets: A paradigm of ecological optics”Nature293293–294.
20.
LeeD NYoungD SReddishP ELoughSClaytonT M H, 1983“Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A35333–346.
21.
LevittH, 1971“Transformed up–down methods in psychoacoustics”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America49467–477.
22.
LiptonL, 1997StereoGraphics Developers' Handbook (San Rafael, CA: StereoGraphics Corp.).
McBeathM KMorikawaK, 1997“Forward-facing motion biases for rigid and nonrigid biologically likely transformations”Perceptual & Motor Skills851187–1193.
27.
McBeathM KMorikawaKKaiserM K, 1992“Perceptual bias for forward-facing motion”Psychological Science3362–367.
28.
McBeathM KShafferD MKaiserM K, 1995“How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls”Science268569–573.
29.
MateefSHohnsbeinJ, 1988“Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away”Vision Research28711–719.
30.
MateefSYakimoffNHohnsbeinJEhrensteinW HBohdaneckyZRadilT, 1991“Selective directional sensitivity in visual motion perception”Vision Research31131–138.
31.
MeeseT S, 1995“Using the standard staircase to measure the point of subjective equality: A guide based on computer simulations”Perception & Psychophysics57267–281.
32.
MorikawaKMcBeathM K, 1992“Lateral motion bias associated with reading direction”Vision Research321137–1141.
33.
NakayamaK, 1985“Biological image motion processing: A review”Vision Research25625–660.
34.
NormanJ FToddJ TPerottiV JTittleJ S, 1996“The visual perception of three-dimensional length”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22173–186.
35.
Portfors-YeomansC VReganD, 1996“Cyclopean discrimination thresholds for the direction and speed of motion in depth”Vision Research363265–3279.
36.
ProbstTLooseRNiedeggenMWistE R, 1995“Processing of visual motion direction in the fronto-parallel plane in the stationary or moving observer”Behavioural Brain Research70133–144.
37.
RaymondJ E, 1994“Directional anisotropy of motion sensitivity across the visual field”Vision Research341029–1037.
38.
Reinhardt-RutlandA H, 1983“Induced movement-in-depth: Relative location of static stimulus and direction of asymmetry”Perceptual & Motor Skills57255–258.
39.
Reinhardt-RutlandA H, 1994“Perception of motion in depth from luminous rotating spirals: Directional asymmetries during and after rotation”Perception23763–769.
40.
SchiffWDetwilerM L, 1979“Information used in judging impending collision”Perception8647–658.
41.
ScottT RLavenderA DMcWhirtR APowellD A, 1966“Directional asymmetry of motion aftereffect”Journal of Experimental Psychology71806–815.
42.
SteinmetzM AMotterB CDuffyC J, 1987“Functional properties of parietal visual neurons: Mechanisms of directionality within the visual field”Journal of Neuroscience7177–191.
43.
TakeuchiT, 1997“Visual search of expansion and contraction”Vision Research372083–2090.
44.
WohlgemuthA, 1911“On the aftereffects of seen movement”British Journal of Psychology: Monographs11–117.
