We tested the effects of using a prosthesis for substitution of vision with audition (PSVA) on sensitivity to the Ponzo illusion. The effects of visual experience on the susceptibility to this illusion were also assessed. In one experiment, both early-blind and blindfolded sighted volunteers used the PSVA to explore several variants of the Ponzo illusion as well as control stimuli. No effects of the illusion were observed. The results indicate that subjects focused their attention on the two central horizontal bars of the stimuli, without processing the contextual cues that convey perspective in the Ponzo figure. In a second experiment, we required subjects to use the PSVA to consider the two converging oblique lines of the stimuli before comparing the length of the two horizontal bars. Here we were able to observe susceptibility to the Ponzo illusion in the sighted group, but to a lesser extent than in a sighted non-PSVA control group. No clear effect of the ilusion was obtained in early-blind subjects. These results suggest that, at least in sighted subjects, perception obtained with the PSVA shares perceptual processes with vision. Visual experience appears mandatory for a Ponzo illusion to occur with the PSVA.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppelleSGravetterF, 1985“Effect of modality-specific experience on visual and haptic judgment of orientation”Perception14763–773
2.
ArditiAHoltzamJKosslynS, 1988“Mental imagery and sensory experience in congenital blindness”Neuropsychologia261–12
3.
ArnoPCapelleCWanet-DefalqueM-CCatalan-AhumadaMVeraartC, 1999“Auditory coding of visual patterns for the blind”Perception281013–1029
4.
ArnoPDe VoiderA GVanlierdeAWanet-DefalqueM-CStreelERobertASanabria-BohorquezSVeraartC, 2001a“Occipital activation by pattern recognition in the Early Blind using auditory substitution of vision”NeuroImage13632–645
5.
ArnoPVanlierdeAStreelEWanet-DefalqueM-CSanabria-BohorquezSVeraartC, 2001b“Auditory substitution of vision: pattern recognition by the blind”Applied Cognitive Psychology15509–519
6.
Bach-Y-RitaP, 1972Brain Mechanisms in Sensory Substitution (San Diego, CA: Academic Press)
7.
Bach-Y-RitaPCollinsC CSaundersFWhiteBScaddenL, 1969“Vision substitution by tactile image projection”Nature221963–964
8.
Bach-Y-RitaPKaczmareckK ATylerM EGarcia-LaraJ, 1998“Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: A technical note”Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development35427–430
9.
BeanC H, 1938“The blind have optical illusions”Journal of Experimental Psychology22283–289
10.
CamposJ JLangerAKrowitzA, 1970“Cardiac responses on the visual cliff in prelocomotor human infants”Science170196–197
11.
CapelleCTrullemansCArnoPVeraartC, 1998“A real time experimental prototype for enhancement of vision rehabilitation using auditory substitution”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering451279–1293
12.
CaslaMBlancoFTraviesoD, 1999“Haptic perception of geometric illusions by persons who are totally congenitally blind”Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness93583–588
13.
CollinsC CBach-Y-RitaP, 1973“Transmission of pictorial information through the skin”Advances in Biological and Medical Physics14285–315
14.
DayR H, 1972“Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation”Science1751335–1340
15.
FisherG H, 1970“An experimental and theoretical appraisal of the perspective and size-constancy theories of illusions”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology22631–652
16.
FrisbyJ PDaviesI R L, 1971“Is the haptic Müller-Lyer a visual phenomenon?”Nature231463–465
GordonF RYonasA, 1976“Sensitivity to binocular depth information in infants”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology22413–422
19.
GregoryR L, 1963“Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling”Nature199678–691
20.
GregoryR LWallaceJ G, 1963Recovery from Early Blindness: A Case Study Experimental Psychology Society Monograph No. 2 (London: Heffer)
21.
HeldR, 1968“Dissociation of visual functions by deprivation and rearrangement”Psychologische Forschung31338–348
22.
HellerM A, 2000aTouch, Representation and BlindnessDebates in Psychology Series (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
23.
HellerM A, 2000b“Haptic perceptual illusions”, in Toucher pour connaître Eds HatwellYStreriAGentazE (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France) pp 163–174
24.
HellerM ACalcaterraJ ATylerL ABursonL L, 1996“Production and interpretation of perspective drawings by blind and sighted people”Perception25321–334
25.
von HelmholtzH1867/1962“Concerning the perceptions in general”, in Treatise on Physiological Opticsvolume 3, English translation by SouthallJ P C for the Optical Society of America (1925) from the 3rd German edition of Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik (first published in 1867, Leipzig: Voss)
26.
KaczmarekK A, 1995“Sensory augmentation and substitution”, in Sensory augmentation and substitution Ed. BronzinoJ D (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press) pp 2100–2109
27.
KaczmarekK AWebsterJ GBach-Y-RitaPTompkinsW J, 1991“Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering381–16
28.
KennedyJ MGabiasPNicholsA, 1991“Tactile pictures”, in The Psychology of Touch Eds HellerM ASchiffW (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 263–300
29.
LeibowitzH WJudischJ A, 1967“The relation between age and the Ponzo illusion”American Journal of Psychology80105–109
30.
LessardNPareMLeporeFLassondeM, 1998“Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects”Nature395278–280
31.
MeijerP B L, 1992“An experimental system for auditory image representations”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering39112–121, reprinted in the 1993 IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics pp 291–300
32.
MorganM J, 1977Molyneux's Question (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
33.
O'ReganJ KNoëA, 2001“A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness”Behavioral and Brain Sciences24939–1011
34.
RauscheckerJ P, 1995“Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex”Trends in Neurosciences1836–43
35.
RenierLCollignonOTranduyDVanlierdeADe VoiderA G, 2003“Depth perception with a sensory substitution system in early blind subjects”, in Annual Meeting of the Belgian Psychological Society (Brussels: Universal Press) pp 36
36.
RévészG, 1934“System der optischen und haptischen Raumtäuschungen”Zeitschrift für Psychologie131292–375
37.
RévészG, 1950The Psychology of Art of the Blind (London: Longmans Green)
38.
RiceC E, 1969“Perceptual enhancement in the early blind?”Psychological Record191–14
39.
RobinsonJ O, 1998The Psychology of Visual Illusionsecond edition (London: Hutchinson University Library)
40.
RockI, 1975An Introduction to Perception (New York: Macmillan)
41.
RöderBTeder-SalejarviWSterrARosierFHillyardS ANevilleH G, 1999“Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans”Nature400162–166
42.
SampaioEMarisSBach-Y-RitaP, 2001“Brain plasticity: ‘visual’ acuity of blind persons via the tongue”Brain Research908204–207
TauschR, 1954“Optische Täuschungen als artifizielle Effekte der Gestaltungsprozesse von Grössen und Formenkonstanz in der natürlichen Raumwahrnehmung”Psychologische Forschung24299–348
