Animal studies reveal that many species perceive partially occluded objects in the same way as do humans. Pigeons have been a notable exception. We re-investigated this anomaly of pigeon perception using a different approach from previous studies. With our method, we show that pigeons perceive occluded objects in the same manner as do other species. In addition, we report that pigeons can recognize perceptually transparent surfaces when the effect is induced by the same perceptual mechanisms as occlusion. These results give behavioral evidence that the perception of both occlusion and transparency is a common visual function shared by pigeons and humans, despite the structural differences between their visual systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelsonE HAnandanP, 1990“Ordinal characteristics of transparency”Proceedings of the AAAI-90 Workshop on Qualitative Vision (Boston, MA: AAAI) pp 77–81
2.
BakinJ SNakayamaKGilbertC D, 2000“Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configuration”Journal of Neuroscience208188–8198
3.
CerellaJ, 1980“The pigeon's analysis of pictures”Pattern Recognition121–6
4.
DeruelleCBarbetIDepsyDFagotJ, 2000“Perception of partly occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio)” Perception291483–1497
5.
DiPietroN TWassermanE AYoungM E, 2002“Effects of occlusion on pigeons' visual object recognition”Perception311299–1312
6.
FujitaK, 2001“Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia)” Perception & Psychophysics63115–125
7.
GrossbergS, 1997“Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional figure – ground perception of two-dimensional pictures”Psychological Review104618–658
8.
IngleD, 1978“Mechanisms of shape-recognition among vertebrates”, in Handbook of Sensory Physiology VIII: Perception Eds HeldRLeibowitzH WTeuberH L (New York: Springer) pp 259–287
9.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception (New York: Praeger)
10.
KanizsaGRenziPConteSCompostelaCGueraniL, 1993“Amodal completion in mouse vision”Perception22713–721
11.
LeaS E GSlaterA MRyanC M E, 1996“Perception of object unity in chicks: A comparison with the human infant”Infant Behavior and Development19501–504
12.
MetelliF, 1974“The perception of transparency”Scientific American230(4) 90–98
NagasakaYOsadaY, 1998“Squirrel monkeys can see objects under conditions of transparency”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science39S851 (abstract)
15.
NakayamaKShimojoSSilvermanG H, 1989“Stereoscopic depth: its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects”Perception1855–68
16.
OsadaYSchillerP H, 1994“Can monkeys see objects under conditions of transparency and occlusion?”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science35(4) 1664 (abstract)
17.
RegolinLVallortigaraG, 1995“Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks”Perception & Psychophysics57971–976
18.
SatoAKanazawaSFujitaK, 1997“Perception of object unity in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes)”Japanese Psychological Research39191–199
19.
SekulerA BLeeJ AShettleworthS J, 1996“Pigeons do not complete partly occluded figures”Perception251109–1120
20.
ShimizuTKartenH J, 1993“The avian visual system and the evolution of the neocortex”, in Vision, Brain, and Behavior in Birds Eds ZeiglerH PBischofH J (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 103–114
21.
SugitaY, 1999“Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex”Nature401269–272
22.
TakahashiMOkanoyaK, 2001“Singing to invisible mates: Completion of occluded images of female conspecifics by male Bengalese finches”Abstracts of the 6th International Congress of Neuroethology133
WatanabeSFuruyaI, 1997“Video display for study of avian visual cognition: From psychophysics to sign language”International Journal of Comparative Psychology10111–127
