Anchoring theory (Gilchrist et al, 1999 Psychological Review106 795 – 834) predicts a wide range of lightness errors, including failures of constancy in multi-illumination scenes and a long list of well-known lightness illusions seen under homogeneous illumination. Lightness values are computed both locally and globally and then averaged together. Local values are computed within a given region of homogeneous illumination. Thus, for an object that extends through two different illumination levels, anchoring theory produces two values, one for the patch in brighter illumination and one for the patch in dimmer illumination. Observers can give matches for these patches separately, but they can also give a single match for the whole object. Anchoring theory in its current form is unable to predict these object matches. We report eight experiments in which we studied the relationship between patch matches and object matches. The results show that the object match represents a compromise between the match for the patch in the field of highest illumination and the patch in the largest field of illumination. These two principles are parallel to the rules found for anchoring lightness: highest luminance rule and area rule.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelsonE HPentlandA P, 1996“The perception of shading and reflectance”, in Perception as Bayesian Inference Eds KnillDRichardsW (New York: Cambridge University Press) pp 409–423
2.
AgostiniT, 2003“Luce, ombra e colore: i fatti oltre le parole”, in Figura e Sfondo: Temi e Variazioni per Paolo Bozzi, a cura di U Savardi, Ed. MazzoccoA (Padua: CLEUP) pp 155–162
3.
AgostiniTBrunoN, 1996“Lightness contrast in CRT and paper-and-illuminant displays”Perception & Psychophysics58250–258
4.
BarrowH GTenenbaumJ, 1978“Recovering intrinsic scene characteristics from images”, in Computer Vision Systems Eds HansonA RRisemanE M (Orlando, FL: Academic Press) pp 3–26
5.
BergströmS S, 1977“Common and relative components of reflected light as information about the illumination, colour, and three-dimensional form of objects”Scandinavian Journal of Psychology18180–186
6.
BressanP, 2006a“The place of white in a world of greys: A double-anchoring theory of lightness perception”Psychological Review113526–553
7.
BressanP, 2006b“Inhomogeneous surrounds, conflicting frameworks, and the double-anchoring theory of lightness”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review1322–32
8.
CataliottiJGilchristA L, 1995“Local and global processes in lightness perception”Perception & Psychophysics57125–135
9.
EconomouEAnnanVGilchristA, 1998“Contrast depends on anchoring in perceptual groups”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science39(4) S857 (abstract)
10.
GilchristA, 1979“The perception of surface blacks and whites”Scientific American240(3) 112–123
11.
GilchristADelmanSJacobsenA, 1983“The classification and integration of edges as critical to the perception of reflectance and illumination”Perception & Psychophysics33425–436
12.
GilchristAKossyfidisCBonatoFAgostiniTCataliottiJLiXSpeharB, 1999“An anchoring theory of lightness perception”Psychological Review106795–834
13.
von HelmholtzH, 1867/1924–1925Treatise on Physiological Optics English translation by SouthallJ P C for the Optical Society of America (volume 1, 1924; volumes 2 and 3, 1925) from the 3rd German edition of Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (first published in 1867, Leipzig: Voss)
14.
KardosL, 1934Ding und Schatten [Object and Shadow]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie Ergänzungsband 23
15.
KatzD, 1935The World of Colour (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co)
16.
KönigA, 1897“Die Abhängigkeit der Sehschärfe von der Beleuchtungsintensität”Sitzberichte der Akademie für Wissenschaften35559–575
17.
LiXGilchristA, 1999“Relative area and relative luminance combine to anchor surface lightness values”Perception & Psychophysics61771–785
18.
MacLeodR B, 1932“An experimental investigation of brightness constancy”Archives of Psychology1355–102
19.
NakayamaKShimojoS, 1990“Da Vinci stereopsis-depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points”Vision Research301811–1825
20.
RamachandranV S, 1988“Perception of shape from shading”Nature331163–166
