The information that people use to perceive whether a tool is suitable for a certain task depends on what is available at a given time. Visually scanning a tool and wielding it each provide information about the functional attributes of the tool. In experiment 1, we investigated the relative contributions of vision and dynamic touch to perceiving the suitability of various tools for various tasks. The results show that, when both vision and dynamic touch are available, the visual information dominates. When limited to dynamic touch, ratings of suitability are constrained by the inertial properties of the tool, and the inertial properties that are exploited depend on the task. In experiment 2, we asked whether the manner in which a tool is manipulated in exploration depends on the task for which it is being evaluated. The results suggest that tools are manipulated in ways that reflect intentions to perceive particular affordances. Exploratory movements sometimes mimic performatory movements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmazeenE LTurveyM T, 1996“Weight perception and the haptic size – weight illusion are functions of the inertial tensor”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22213–232
2.
ArzamarskiRIsenhowerRMichaelsC F, forthcoming, “Learning in dynamic touch”
3.
BongersR MMichaelsC FSmitsmanA W, 2004“Variations of tool and task characteristics reveal that tool use postures are anticipated”Journal of Motor Behavior36305–315
4.
BongersR MSmitsmanA WMichaelsC F, 2003“Geometrics and dynamics of a rod determine how it is used for reaching”Journal of Motor Behavior354–22
5.
CarelloCFitzpatrickPDomaniewiczIChanT-CTurveyM T, 1992“Effortful touch with minimal movement”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18290–302
6.
CarelloCTurveyM T, 2000“Rotational dynamics and dynamic touch”, in Touch, Representation, and Blindness Ed. HellerM (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 27–66
7.
FitzpatrickPCarelloCTurveyM T, 1994“Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the ‘muscle sense’”Neuroscience60551–568
8.
GibsonJ J, 1966The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin)
9.
PaganoC CAtenT RAlleyT R, 1998“Perceiving the lengths of rods wielded with and without vision”, poster presented at the North American Meeting of the International Society for Ecological Psychology, Trinity College, Hartford
10.
PaganoC CTurveyM T, 1992“Eigenvectors of the inertia tensor and perceiving the orientation of a hand-held object by dynamic touch”Perception & Psychophysics52617–624
11.
RileyM AWagmanJ BSantanaM-VCarelloCTurveyM T, 2002“Perceptual behavior: recurrence analysis of a haptic exploratory procedure”Perception31481–510
12.
RunesonSFrykholmG, 1983“Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis of person-and-action perception: expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General112585–615
13.
ShockleyKCarelloCTurveyM T, 2004“Metamers in the haptic perception of heaviness and moveableness”Perception & Psychophysics66731–742
14.
ShockleyKGrockiMCarelloCTurveyM T, 2001“Somatosensory attunement to the rigid body laws”Experimental Brain Research136133–137
15.
SolomonH YTurveyM T, 1988“Haptically perceiving the distance reachable with hand-held objects”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14404–427
16.
SteenbergenBvan der KampJSmitsmanA WCarsonR G, 1997“Spoon handling in two- to four-year-old children”Ecological Psychology9113–129
17.
StoffregenTBardyB, 2001“On specification and the senses”Behavioral and Brain Science24195–261
18.
StroopMTurveyM TFitzpatrickPCarelloC, 2000“Inertia tensor and weight-percept models of length perception by static holding”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance261133–1147
19.
TurveyM TBurtonGAmazeenE LButwillMCarelloC, 1998“Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2435–48
20.
TurveyM TShockleyKCarelloC, 1999“Affordance, proper function and the physical basis of perceived heaviness”Cognition73B17–B26
21.
WagmanJ BCarelloC, 2001“Affordances and inertial constraints on tool use”Ecological Psychology13173–195
22.
WagmanJ BCarelloC, 2003“Haptically creating affordances: The user – tool interface”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied9175–186
23.
WagmanJ BShockleyKRileyM ATurveyM T, 2001“Attunement, calibration, and exploration in fast haptic perceptual learning”Journal of Motor Behavior33323–327
24.
WarrenW H, 1984“Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance in stair climbing”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10683–703
25.
WithagenRMichaelsC F, 2004“Transfer of calibration in length perception by dynamic touch”Perception & Psychophysics661295–1305
26.
WithagenRMichaelsC F, 2005“Information for calibration and information for attunement in length perception by dynamic touch”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance311379–1390
