We tested whether isolated visible articulatory information can be used for identifying familiar speakers. A facial point-light methodology was used to isolate the visible articulation of seven speakers. These point-light video clips were then shown to nine participants who had long-term personal interactions with the speakers. Results revealed that participants could identify the speakers at better than chance levels when the faces were shown articulating, but not when the faces were shown without movement. The results indicate that visible articulatory information can be used to identify speakers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BruceVValentineT, 1988“When a nod's as good as a wink: The role of dynamic information in facial recognition”, in Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues volume 1: Memory in Everyday Life Eds GrunebergM MMorrisP ESykesR N, (New York: John Wiley & Sons) pp 169–174.
2.
BruceVYoungA, 1986“Understanding face recognition”British Journal of Psychology77305–327.
3.
EllisH D, 1989“Processes underlying face recognition”, in Neuropsychology of Face Perception and Facial Expression Ed. BruyerR, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 471–478.
4.
LanderKChristieFBruceV, 1999“The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces”Memory & Cognition27974–985.
5.
LanderKChuangL, 2005“Why are moving faces easier to recognize?”Visual Cognition12429–442.
6.
RemezR EFellowesJ MRubinP E, 1997“Talker identification based on phonetic information”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23651–666.
7.
RosenblumL D, 2005“The primacy of multimodal speech perception”, in Handbook of Speech Perception Eds PisoniDRemezR, (Malden, MA: Blackwell) pp 51–78.
8.
RosenblumL DYakelD ABaseerNPanchalANordarseB CNiehusR P, 2002“Visual speech information for face recognition”Perception & Psychophysics64220–229.
9.
SchweinbergerS RSoukupG R, 1998“Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance241748–1765.
10.
YakelD ARosenblumL DFortierM A, 2000“Effects of talker variability on speechreading”Perception & Psychophysics621405–1412.